12.07.2015 Views

Death Claim - Gbic.co.in

Death Claim - Gbic.co.in

Death Claim - Gbic.co.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lucknow Ombudsman CentreCase No. : L-114/21/001/06-07Shri Rupesh Kumar GuptaVsLife Insurance Corporation of IndiaAward dated 19.01.2007Shri Rupesh Kumar Gupta had lodged a <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t with Insurance Ombudsman foralleged unjustified repudiation of claim by LIC of India under policy no.253185825 onthe life of his wife Smt. Anita Gupta on the ground that the fact regard<strong>in</strong>g earliercaesarian delivery was not disclosed <strong>in</strong> the proposal form by the life assured and thisaffected the underwrit<strong>in</strong>g decision of the <strong>in</strong>surer. If this would have been disclosed shewould have been asked to <strong>co</strong>mplete addendum to proposal form as well as to submitreport from attend<strong>in</strong>g Gyne<strong>co</strong>logist on form 3341 and also to submit haemogram report.Besides one of the causes of her death was Hepatic Encephalopathy and Hepatitis-E<strong>in</strong>fection developed dur<strong>in</strong>g her pregnancy. S<strong>in</strong>ce the claim has been repudiated with<strong>in</strong>two years from the date the policy was effected. The repudiation of the claim on theabove ground which was established by certificate of hospital treatment and theadmission of the <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant himself dur<strong>in</strong>g personal hear<strong>in</strong>g was, therefore, held tobe <strong>in</strong> order.Lucknow Ombudsman CentreCase No. : L-544/21/001/06-07Shri JitendraVsLife Insurance Corporation of IndiaAward dated 22.01.2007Shri Jitendra had lodged a <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t with Insurance Ombudsman for alleged unjustifiedrepudiation of claim by LIC of India under policy no.283695944 on the life of his motherSmt. Durga Devi on the ground that she was suffer<strong>in</strong>g from Anemia and Renal diseasesprior to the date of the proposal but she did not disclose the same <strong>in</strong> the proposal form.However, no <strong>co</strong>gent evidence to establish the fact of nondisclosure of the disease wasproduced by the <strong>in</strong>surer so as to establish that <strong>co</strong>nditions of Section 45 of InsuranceAct 1938 were <strong>co</strong>mplied with. The letter of repudiation was, therefore, set aside andthe <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>ant nom<strong>in</strong>ee awarded full payment of claim alongwith accrued bonuses.Lucknow Ombudsman CentreCase No. : L-562/21/001/06-07Shri Nanhe Lal YadavVsLife Insurance Corporation of IndiaAward dated 22.01.2007Shri Nanhe Lal Yadav had lodged a <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t with Insurance Ombudsman for allegedunjustified repudiation of claim by LIC of India under policy no.283592436 on the life ofhis wife Smt. Phoolwati Yadav on the ground that <strong>in</strong> the personal statement regard<strong>in</strong>ghealth dated 09.11.05 submitted for revival of the above policy the life assured hadsuppressed the ailments with which she was suffer<strong>in</strong>g prior to the date of the revival.The Insurer however did not submit any evidence <strong>in</strong> support of his repudiation actioneven although 15 days time as further sought by its representative on the date ofpersonal hear<strong>in</strong>g for the purpose had elapsed by a sufficient marg<strong>in</strong>. The repudiationletter dated 03.05.06 issued by the <strong>in</strong>surer was, therefore, set aside and nom<strong>in</strong>ee

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!