12.07.2015 Views

Death Claim - Gbic.co.in

Death Claim - Gbic.co.in

Death Claim - Gbic.co.in

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Life Insurance Corporation of IndiaAward Dated : 11.12.2006Shri Shivaji Vishnu Pol had taken a Life Insurance policy bear<strong>in</strong>g no. 907499727 fromLife Insurance Corporation of India, Branch 927 through proposal dated 30.07.2003 forSum Assured of Rs.75,000/ under Plan and Term (14-15). The <strong>co</strong>mmencement of thepolicy was 20.08.2003. Shri Shivaji V Pol expired on 29.12.2004. When Smt Rupali SPol wife and nom<strong>in</strong>ee under the policy, preferred a claim under the above said policy toLife Insurance Corporation of India, S.S.S Divisional Office of LIC repudiated the claimstat<strong>in</strong>g that the deceased life assured had withheld material <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g hishealth at the time of effect<strong>in</strong>g the assurance and <strong>in</strong> the proposal form dated 30.7.2003They said they had <strong>in</strong>disputable proof to show that the Life Assured was suffer<strong>in</strong>g fromJuvenile diabetes s<strong>in</strong>ce age 12-13 years and was on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>. He was also a case ofchronic pancreatitis. These facts were not disclosed at the time of tak<strong>in</strong>g the policy.Hence based on this LIC repudiated the claim. Not satisfied by the said decision, SmtRupali S Pol approached this Forum for redressal of her grievance. After perusal of there<strong>co</strong>rds parties to the dispute were called for hear<strong>in</strong>g. The relevant re<strong>co</strong>rds perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gto the case have been perused.It is evident from the history re<strong>co</strong>rded <strong>in</strong> the casepapers of KEM hospital and Jaslok hospital that Shri Shivaji Pol was javel<strong>in</strong> diabetics<strong>in</strong>ce age 12/13 years.It can be established that the above facts were not disclosed <strong>in</strong>his proposal dated 30 th July, 2003. The analysis of the re<strong>co</strong>rds leads to the <strong>co</strong>nclusionthat the deceased life assured had fraudulently suppressed material <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> hisproposal form; <strong>in</strong>stead, he gave deliberate <strong>in</strong><strong>co</strong>rrect statements. S<strong>in</strong>ce he was tak<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> for diabetes, he was very much aware of it. The cause of death, viz.,“Carc<strong>in</strong>oma, Head of Pancreas”, has a direct nexus with the suppressed material<strong>in</strong>formation. “Chronic Pancreatitis may lead to pancreatic failure caus<strong>in</strong>g malabsorptionand diabetes mellitus. The pancreas often be<strong>co</strong>mes calcified produc<strong>in</strong>g visibleshadow<strong>in</strong>g on X rays”. The above is extracted from the Oxford’s Concise MedicalDictionary, Indian Edition. Had Shri Pol disclosed the <strong>co</strong>rrect <strong>in</strong>formation about hispast/present history of illness as also the treatment be<strong>in</strong>g taken by him, to the Insurerat the proposal stage, the Life Insurance Corporation of India would have called forvarious special reports before underwrit<strong>in</strong>g the proposal and taken appropriate decision<strong>in</strong> acceptance of the proposal.In the circumstances, this Forum has no justifiable reason to <strong>in</strong>terfere with the decisionof LIC of India to repudiate the claim on the ground of non-disclosure of material<strong>in</strong>formation.Mumbai Ombudsman CentreCase No. : LI-232 of 2006-2007Smt JayalaxmiV/s.Tata AIG Life Insurance Company Ltd.Award Dated : 28.12.2006Shri Alva Ramayya Santha had taken a Term Assurance Policy for 20 years with returnof premium plan under policy No.C001840670 from Tata AIG Life Insurance Companylimited for a Sum Assured of Rs. 2,00,000/-. The policy also <strong>co</strong>vered an additionalAccidental death benefit of Rs. 2,00,000/-, The date of proposal for <strong>in</strong>surance was26.10.2005. Shri Alva Ramayya Santha unfortunately expired on 18.1.2006 due toTerm<strong>in</strong>al Cardiac Arrest <strong>in</strong> a case of Orbital Mu<strong>co</strong>r-my<strong>co</strong>sis with Diabetes Mellitus withstroke. When Smt Jayalaxmi preferred a claim under the said policy, the Companyrepudiated the claim stat<strong>in</strong>g that Shri Ramayya Santha Alva was on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!