Death Claim - Gbic.co.in
Death Claim - Gbic.co.in
Death Claim - Gbic.co.in
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
VsLife Insurance Corporation of IndiaAward Dated : 25.10.2006Smt. Shankuntala lodged a <strong>co</strong>mpla<strong>in</strong>t with this Forum on 25.04.2005 that her husbandlate Shri Jai Bhawan Sharma died on 29.12.2003. His death claim has been repudiatedby LIC of India. She lives <strong>in</strong> village and is not an educated lady. She has no source of<strong>in</strong><strong>co</strong>me. She has requested this Forum to refund whatever money her husband had paidtowards premium aga<strong>in</strong>st policy No.330345506 so that she <strong>co</strong>uld look after herself withthe money <strong>in</strong> case the claim is not paid.LIC of India, vide their letter dated 09.05.2005, <strong>in</strong>formed this Forum that the deceasedlife assured took policy on 31.03.1998 for sum of Rs.25000/- at half yearly premium ofRs.973/- with Smt.Shakuntla as the nom<strong>in</strong>ee. The life assured, Shri Jai BhagwanSharma, died on 29.12.2003 and <strong>in</strong>timation was received by them on 13.02.2004. Thenom<strong>in</strong>ee under the policy was issued the necessary forms and the same weredeposited by her. The claim was repudiated on 27.07.2004 on grounds of <strong>co</strong>ncealmentof material facts regard<strong>in</strong>g his health at the time of revival of the policy. As per their<strong>in</strong>vestigation <strong>in</strong>to the claim, they have <strong>in</strong>disputable evidence to prove that life assuredwas suffer<strong>in</strong>g from Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Bronchial Asthma prior to date ofrevival. The deceased did not disclose these facts <strong>in</strong> his Declaration of GoodHealth(DGH) for the revival of policy. It is evident that these material facts weredeliberately <strong>co</strong>ncealed to revive the policy <strong>in</strong>surance fraudulently. They have <strong>co</strong>nveyedthe repudiation of the claim on 27.07.2004 to Smt. Shakuntala.At the time of hear<strong>in</strong>g, Smt. Shakuntala <strong>co</strong>ntested that her husband was not suffer<strong>in</strong>gfrom any disease and he died <strong>in</strong> the hospital because of chest pa<strong>in</strong>. She pleaded tothis Forum that her claim maybe paid by LIC of India. LIC of India, at the time ofhear<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>co</strong>ntested that late Shri Jai Bhagwan Sharma had <strong>co</strong>ncealed material factsthat he was suffer<strong>in</strong>g from Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Bronchial Asthma at the time ofrevival of the policy and they have rightly repudiated the claim.On enquiry by this Forum whether any medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation was done at the time oftak<strong>in</strong>g the policy or revival of the policy, the representative of LIC of India onexam<strong>in</strong>ation of the file revealed that medical was done on both the occasions – at thetime of tak<strong>in</strong>g the policy as well as at the time of revival. On exam<strong>in</strong>ation of theQuestion No.9 of Medical Exam<strong>in</strong>er’s Confidential Report – Are there any symptoms orsigns suggest<strong>in</strong>g abnormality or disease of the Respiratory system? TheDoctor(Sqn.Ldr.)S.K.Garg mentioned NO <strong>in</strong> both the reports.In view of the medical exam<strong>in</strong>ation done at the time of tak<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>surance policy aswell as at the time of revival, there be<strong>in</strong>g no adverse medical <strong>co</strong>mments, therefore, Iam not <strong>in</strong> agreement with the observations made by LIC of India, vide their letter dated09.05.2005, addressed to this Forum that late Shri Jai Bhagwan Sharma was suffer<strong>in</strong>gfrom Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Bronchial Asthma prior to the date of revival.I, therefore, pass the Award that Smt.Shakuntala be paid death claim and otherbenefits accrued under policy No.330345506 along with 8% <strong>in</strong>terest from 01.03.2004till the date of payment is made after deduct<strong>in</strong>g the amount towards the loan, if any,taken under the policy by the deceased.The Award shall be implemented with<strong>in</strong> 30 days of receipt of the same. The <strong>co</strong>mplianceof the Award shall be <strong>in</strong>timated to my office for <strong>in</strong>formation and re<strong>co</strong>rd.Delhi Ombudsman CentreCase No. : LI/JD-410