12.07.2015 Views

handbook for cooperating teachers - Wilmington University

handbook for cooperating teachers - Wilmington University

handbook for cooperating teachers - Wilmington University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Teacher Preparation ProgramsScoring Rubric <strong>for</strong> Portfolio Program Competency # 8 – AssessmentPROGRAM COMPETENCY: Use multiple assessment strategies <strong>for</strong> the continuous development of students.DELAWARE PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARD: The teacher understands multiple assessment strategies and usesthem <strong>for</strong> the continuous development of students.NCATE STANDARD: 1.g “Student Learning <strong>for</strong> Teacher Candidates.”STUDENT:___________________________________________SEMESTER:_______________________________EVALUATED ASSIGNMENT:T he teacher candidate will provide credible evidence <strong>for</strong> facilitating student learning. The teacher candidatewill complete a report that demonstrates knowledge of how to accurately assess and analyze student learning,make appropriate adjustments to instruction, monitor student learning, and have a positive effect on studentlearning (NCATE Language). Along with the report, the credible evidence includes: (a) instructional artifacts,(b) assessment activities, (c) data reports/results, and (d) sample student work: to demonstrate the teachercandidate's knowledge and skill of each of the elements of this competency/standard..SCORINGELEMENTS8.1 Thecandidatedemonstratesknowledge ofmeasurementtheoryScore:_____(Whole #’s only)UNSATISFACTORY1The candidatedemonstrated anunsatisfactory level ofknowledge ofmeasurement theory byproviding in<strong>for</strong>mation(relative to the plan) thathas at least four factualinaccuracies <strong>for</strong> allcomponents of thefollowing two elements:(1) explain how the preassessmentand postassessmentitems were (a)EMERGING2The candidatedemonstrated anemerging level ofknowledge aboutmeasurement theory byproviding in<strong>for</strong>mationthat has only threefactual inaccuracies <strong>for</strong>all components of thefollowing two elements:(1) explain how the preassessmentand postassessmentitems were(a) fair, (b) bias-free, andBASIC3The candidatedemonstrated a basiclevel of knowledge aboutmeasurement theory byproviding in<strong>for</strong>mationthat has only two factualinaccuracies <strong>for</strong> allcomponents of thefollowing two elements:(1) explain how the preassessmentand postassessmentitems were(a) fair, (b) bias-free, and(c) appropriate <strong>for</strong> thePROFICIENT4The candidatedemonstrated aproficient level ofknowledge aboutmeasurement theory byproviding in<strong>for</strong>mationthat has only one factualinaccuracy <strong>for</strong> allcomponents thefollowing two elements:(1) explain how the preassessmentand postassessmentitems were (a)fair, (b) bias-free, and (c)DISTINGUISHED5The candidatedemonstrated adistinguished level ofknowledge aboutmeasurement theory byproviding accuratein<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> allcomponents of thefollowing two elements:(1) explain how the preassessmentand postassessmentitems were (a)fair, (b) bias-free, and (c)appropriate <strong>for</strong> theCollege of EducationProfessional PartnersCreating Environments <strong>for</strong> Learning69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!