STRUCTURED EXTERNAL ASSIGNMENT AND CECRAM DATA COLLECTIONCOURSE: MSE 8802TITLE: Student Teaching in Special EducationPROGRAM COMPETENCY 3: Analyze in<strong>for</strong>mal and <strong>for</strong>mal assessments used in identifying students with special needs and develop plans to meeteducational goals and objectives.PROGRAM COMPETENCY 5: Plan and implement content lessons that accommodate or adapt <strong>for</strong> unique needs of individuals with severe and multipledisabilitiesGRADUATION COMPETENCY 1: Exercise critical thinking strategies, including reasoning, problem solving, analysis, and evaluation and apply themappropriately to one’s field of study; 2: Utilize research methods and findings as they apply to one’s profession; 3: Demonstrate advanced oral and writtencommunication skills; 4. Apply legal and ethical principles to guide professional behaviors and decision making.CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK PROGRAM ATTRIBUTE 2: Programs view educators as learners; 7: Programs are standards drivenDELAWARE PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARD 9: The teacher understands the importance of reflection on practice and actively seeksopportunities to grow professionally; 3: The teacher understands how students differ andadapts instruction <strong>for</strong> diverse learnersNCATE STANDARD 1: Knowledge, skills, and dispositionsCEC STANDARDS 7: Instructional Planning;8: AssessmentSTRUCTURED EXTERNAL ASSIGNMENT: Teacher candidates will compile pre-test/diagnostic in<strong>for</strong>mation based on a chosen student’s IEP’s goals andobjectives, lesson plans and implementation of such with post-test/diagnostic in<strong>for</strong>mation discussing what the student has learned. Teacher candidates willdevelop remedial lesson plans <strong>for</strong> correction and implementation and collect assessment in<strong>for</strong>mation reporting the level of student success <strong>for</strong> the successivelessons being reported.COMPETENCY 5 RUBRICSCORINGELEMENTS5.1 Understanding ofmajor elements ofinstructional planning.UNSATISFACTORY1The candidate was able toaccurately describe andgive examples of how toincorporate fewer thanEMERGING2The candidate was ableto accurately describeand give examples ofhow to incorporate twoBASIC3The candidate wasable to accuratelydescribe and giveexamples of how toPROFICIENT4The candidate was ableto accurately describeand give examples ofhow to incorporateDISTINGUISHED5The candidate was ableto accurately describeand give examples (inthe lesson plans) of how94
CEC Standard -SevenInstructionalPlanningScore:_____5.2 Understanding thateffective instructionalplanning requiresalignment ofinstruction prior tolesson delivery.CEC Standard -SevenInstructionalPlanningScore:_____5.3 Understanding ofhow to develop long(unit) and short rangetwo of the following fiveelements of instructionalplanning into the planningprocess: (1) learningtheory, (2) content, (3)curriculum development,(4) assessment, and (5)student levels ofdevelopment.The candidate was unableto describe the alignmentbetween assessment andinstruction because he/sheclearly addressed fewerthan two of the followingelements: (1) statement ofobjectives, (2) descriptionof instructional strategiesused in the lesson, (3)description of assessmentstrategies used in thelesson, (4) rationale <strong>for</strong>how the assessmentsdescribed align with thestated learning objectivesand instructional strategies,and (5) examples of thatalignment.The candidatedemonstrated anunsatisfactory* level ofof the following fiveelements ofinstructional planninginto the planningprocess: (1) learningtheory, (2) content, (3)curriculumdevelopment, (4)assessment, and (5)student levels ofdevelopment.The candidate was ableto describe thealignment betweenassessment andinstruction by clearlyaddressing two of thefollowing elements:(1) statement oflearning objectives, (2)description ofinstructional strategiesused in the lesson, (3)description ofassessment strategiesused in the lesson, (4)rationale <strong>for</strong> how theassessments describedalign with the statedlearning objectives andinstructional strategies,and (5) examples ofthat alignment.The candidatedemonstrated anemerging* level ofincorporate three ofthe following fiveelements ofinstructional planninginto the planningprocess: (1) learningtheory, (2) content, (3)curriculumdevelopment, (4)assessment, and (5)student levels ofdevelopment.The candidate wasable to describe thealignment betweenassessment andinstruction by clearlyaddressing three ofthe followingelements: (1)statement of learningobjectives, (2)description ofinstructional strategiesused in the lesson, (3)description ofassessment strategiesused in the lesson, (4)rationale <strong>for</strong> how theassessments describedalign with the statedlearning objectives andinstructional strategies,and (5) examples ofthat alignment.The candidatedemonstrated a basic*level of understandingfour of the followingfive elements ofinstructional planninginto the planningprocess: (1) learningtheory, (2) content, (3)curriculumdevelopment, (4)assessment, and (5)student levels ofdevelopment.The candidate was ableto describe thealignment betweenassessment andinstruction by clearlyaddressing four of thefollowing elements:(1) statement oflearning objectives, (2)description ofinstructional strategiesused in the lesson, (3)description ofassessment strategiesused in the lesson, (4) arationale <strong>for</strong> how theassessments describedalign with the statedlearning objectives andinstructional strategies,and (5) examples ofthat alignment.The candidatedemonstrated aproficient* level ofto incorporate thefollowing five elementsof instructional planninginto the planningprocess: (1) learningtheory, (2) content, (3)curriculumdevelopment, (4)assessment, and (5)student levels ofdevelopment.The candidate was ableto describe thealignment betweenassessment andinstruction by clearlyaddressing all five ofthe following elements:(1) statement oflearning objectives, (2)description ofinstructional strategiesused in the lesson, (3)description ofassessment strategiesused in the lesson, (4) arationale <strong>for</strong> how theassessments describedalign with the statedlearning objectives andinstructional strategies,and (5) examples of thatalignment.The candidatedemonstrated adistinguished* level of95
- Page 1 and 2:
College of EducationHANDBOOK FORCOO
- Page 3 and 4:
TABLE OF CONTENTSCollege of Educati
- Page 5 and 6:
We envision our students, as they t
- Page 7 and 8:
Master of Education in School Leade
- Page 9 and 10:
group and individual interviews hel
- Page 11 and 12:
to make judgments, come to informed
- Page 13 and 14:
improved practice, (b) increased st
- Page 15:
Improved oral and written communica
- Page 18 and 19:
PREREQUISITES:The Teacher Internshi
- Page 20 and 21:
Learning Outcomes/Learning Activiti
- Page 22 and 23:
9.2 participate in professional dis
- Page 24 and 25:
13.10 appreciates the importance of
- Page 26 and 27:
handbooks. Teacher Interns are aske
- Page 28 and 29:
TYPICAL (SUGGESTED) SCHEDULE* FOR 4
- Page 30 and 31:
12. Participate in regular progress
- Page 32 and 33:
37. School/district policies regard
- Page 35 and 36:
Finally, I want you to summarize th
- Page 37 and 38:
You could also try offering some op
- Page 39 and 40:
documentation.Recommend early inter
- Page 41:
LESSON PLANNING USING THE WIMU TEMP
- Page 44 and 45: In any event, solo teaching should
- Page 46 and 47: Clinical semester credits may, unde
- Page 49 and 50: In many cases, the rubrics let you
- Page 51 and 52: APPENDIX:BS, MEE, and MAT Program P
- Page 53 and 54: SCORINGELEMENTS1.2 Understanding of
- Page 55 and 56: 2.2 Understanding ofhuman developme
- Page 57 and 58: SCORINGELEMENTS3.1 Understanding of
- Page 59 and 60: Teacher Preparation ProgramsScoring
- Page 61 and 62: Teacher Preparation ProgramsScoring
- Page 63 and 64: Teacher Preparation ProgramsScoring
- Page 65 and 66: 6.5Understanding ofhow to maximizet
- Page 67 and 68: Teacher Preparation ProgramsScoring
- Page 69 and 70: Teacher Preparation ProgramsScoring
- Page 71 and 72: 8.3 Thecandidatedemonstratesknowled
- Page 73 and 74: (teacher-designed); (3)publisher-de
- Page 75 and 76: SCORINGELEMENTSUNSATISFACTORY1EMERG
- Page 77 and 78: SCORINGELEMENTS10.2 Understands sch
- Page 79 and 80: strategies, equitablydistributing r
- Page 81 and 82: SCORINGELEMENTS11.2 Understands how
- Page 83 and 84: SCORINGELEMENTS12.2 Understands leg
- Page 85 and 86: 13.3 Candidateunderstands theimport
- Page 87 and 88: Teacher Preparation ProgramsScoring
- Page 89 and 90: College of EducationMASTER OF EDUCA
- Page 91 and 92: Implement Strategies - Develop and
- Page 93: Implement strategies towards assist
- Page 97 and 98: during discussion, (3)rephrasing qu
- Page 99 and 100: identify achievementgain and diffic
- Page 101 and 102: 3.5 The candidatedemonstratesknowle
- Page 103 and 104: Wilmington UniversityClinical Repor
- Page 105 and 106: What data will indicate that the st
- Page 107 and 108: of the elements in the rubric?Time
- Page 109 and 110: Wilmington University Teacher Prepa
- Page 111 and 112: Wilmington UniversityCollege of Edu
- Page 113 and 114: Competency 2: Human Development and
- Page 115 and 116: Competency 5: Learning Environment
- Page 117 and 118: Competency 7: Instructional Strateg
- Page 119 and 120: Competency 9: Professional Growth -
- Page 121 and 122: Competency 12: Professional Conduct
- Page 123 and 124: Competency 14: Employment - Obtain
- Page 125 and 126: Narrative Comments (Optional)Teache
- Page 127 and 128: Delaware Standards: This should inc
- Page 129 and 130: Formative Assessment (ongoing) How
- Page 131 and 132: Formative Assessment (ongoing) How
- Page 133 and 134: REFLECTION SHEETTeacher/Teacher Int
- Page 135 and 136: .COOPERATING TEACHER STIPENDIn orde