12.07.2015 Views

Studies on Policy Option for Quality Seed Production and ... - NFPCSP

Studies on Policy Option for Quality Seed Production and ... - NFPCSP

Studies on Policy Option for Quality Seed Production and ... - NFPCSP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> print media <strong>and</strong> relatives had also the credibility in transferring in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> to the farmers. Someparticipants as their preferred in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> sources cited the names of private companies <strong>and</strong> NGOs.Table 4.3.5 Preferred sources of in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> to framers in the study areasSource of in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> Rajshahi Kishoreg<strong>on</strong>jScore Rank Score RankDAE 77 1 st 60 1 stNeighboring farmer 63 2 nd 48 2 ndDealer 58 3 rd 41 3 rdNGO 42 5 th 31 5 thRadio, TV, news paper 56 4 th 41 3 rdCompanies - - 32 4 thRelatives - - 41 3 rd4.3.6 Sources of technological supportVenn diagram shows the various sources of technological <strong>and</strong> other support regarding maize cultivati<strong>on</strong>in Rajshahi (Fig. 4.3.1). During PRA sessi<strong>on</strong> the participants reported that am<strong>on</strong>g the sources, DAEwas the <strong>on</strong>e followed by NGO <strong>and</strong> dealer. Other farmer was marked as the smallest source of receivingtechnological support. Venn diagram further shows that DAE was the most dependable <strong>and</strong> closerorganizati<strong>on</strong> of the participants. Farmers also identified dealer as their close source of technologicalsupport.Farmers in the Kasiganga village of Dinajpur menti<strong>on</strong>ed that they used <strong>on</strong>ly five sources <strong>for</strong> theirtechnological support <strong>for</strong> maize cultivati<strong>on</strong>. Neighboring farmers was the key in<strong>for</strong>mant which wasranked 1 st (40%) followed by NGO (25%), seed dealer (20%), DAE (10%) <strong>and</strong> relative (5%) (Fig.4.3.1). As per experience of the participants, DAE was the closest source to them to providetechnological support through SAAO. In spite of smallest in size, ‘other farmers’ also remained closerto the participants to disseminate advice regarding cultivati<strong>on</strong>.Participants in the Kishoreg<strong>on</strong>j menti<strong>on</strong>ed that am<strong>on</strong>g the sources DAE was the biggest <strong>on</strong>e followedby Bangladesh Krishi Bank <strong>and</strong> dealer (Fig. 4.3.1). Experienced farmer was the smallest source oftechnological support. Venn diagram further shows that DAE was the most dependable <strong>and</strong> closerorganizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> the resp<strong>on</strong>dent farmers. Farmers occasi<strong>on</strong>ally used to go to the bank to receive credits.But <strong>on</strong>ly a few could manage to borrow loan from the bank. There<strong>for</strong>e, bank stood far away from thefarmers.86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!