Studies on Policy Option for Quality Seed Production and ... - NFPCSP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Annex 15. Socio-economic profile of the wheat farmers in RangpurCharacteristicsFarmers’ categoryAverageLarge Medium Small S.D ± (all categories)Sample size 8 55 87 - -Yrs. of schooling 8.0 7.1 5.4 3.51 6.83Farming experience 23.0 21.5 21.0 12.34 21.83Family size 7.3 5.2 4.2 2.21 5.57Farm size (dec) 791 290 113 110 398.00Link with NGO (%) 25 27 40 23.32 30.67Annual income (Tk) 40750 32134 16638 1321 29840.67Share of seed income (%) 1.8 4.1 2 1.02 2.63Annex 16. Wheat grain production package and profitability in Rajshahi, 2008-09Large Medium Small AverageItemValueValueValueValueQtyQtyQtyQty(Tk./ha)(Tk./ha)(Tk./ha)(Tk./ha)Ploughing number 3 2220 3 2220 2.8 2072 2.9 2171Seed (kg) 154 6006 152 5928 149 5811 152 5915Cowdung (kg) 5548 2774 5257 2629 2035 1018 4280 2140Urea (kg) 239 2868 196 2352 178 2136 204 2452TSP/DAP (kg) 95 3800 85 3400 34 1360 71 2853MP (kg) 76 2280 63 1890 32 960 57 1710Gypsum (kg) 63 378 51 306 29 174 48 286Boron fertilizers 5 600 6 720 0 0 3.7 440Irrigation (No) 1.51 1117 1.46 1080 1.21 895 1.4 1031Weeding (No) 0.27 - 0.25 - 0.18 - 0.2 -Herbicide spray 0.07 - 0.19 - 0.07 - 0.1 -Human Labour (MD) 72 8640 68 8160 66 7920 69 8240a) Total variable cost - 30683 - 28685 - 22346 - 27238b) Fixed cost (for land) - 10000 - 10000 - 10000 - 10000Total cost (a+b) - 40683 - 38685 - 32346 - 37238Yield (kg/ha): Grain 3547 53205 3352 50280 2611 39165 3170 47550Straw 3440 1720 3117 1559 2263 1132 2940 1470Gross return - 54925 - 51839 - 40297 49020Gross margin:a) Variable cost basis - 24242 - 23154 - 17951 - 21782b) Total cost basis 14242 13154 7951 - 11782BCR (total cost basis) 1.35 1.34 1.25 - 1.31Costing rate: Ploughing @ Tk. 740/ploughing/ha, Seed @ Tk. 39.00/kg, Cowdung @ Tk. 0.5/kg, Urea @ Tk. 12.00/kg, TSP @Tk. 40.00/kg, MP @ Tk 30.00/kg, Gypsum @ Tk. 6.00/kg, Boric acid @ Tk. 120.00/kg, Human Labour wage @ Tk.120.00/manday, Irrigation @ Tk. 740.00/No/ha, Grain price @ Tk. 15.00/kg, Straw @ Tk. 0.50/kg120
Annex 17. Wheat grain production package and profitability in Dinajpur (2008-09)ItemQtyLarge Medium Small AverageValue(Tk./ha)QtyValue(Tk./ha)QtyValue(Tk./ha)QtyValue(Tk./ha)Ploughing number 2.9 2149 2.9 2149 3 2223 2.95 2186Seed (kg) 160 6240 169.4 6607 170 6630 169 6582Manure (kg) 3587 5381 4423 6635 4839 7259 4550 6826Urea (kg) 166 1992 167 2004 157 1884 162 1942TSP/DAP (kg) 45.39 1816 42.15 1686 32.76 1310 38 1508MP (kg) 50 1500 34.35 1031 24.94 748 31 935Gypsum (kg) 34.75 174 46.6 233 44.7 224 44.5 223Boric acid (kg) 2 120 2.42 145 2.9 174 2.62 157Irrigation (No) 1.33 986 1.44 1067 1.32 978 1.37 1014Weeding (No) - - 0.27 - 0.16 -Herbicide spray 0.07 8 0.19 22 0.07 47 0.12 33Human Labour (MD) 66 7920 67 8040 70.73 8488 68.79 8255a) Total variable cost - 28284 - 29618 - 29964 29660b) Fixed cost (for land) 10000 10000 10000 10000Total cost (a+b) 38284 39618 39964 39660Yield (kg): Grain 2837 42555 2806 42090 2659 39885 2735 41019Straw 2840 2840 2810 2810 2660 2660 2737 2737Gross return - 45395 - 44900 - 42545 43756Gross margin:a) Variable cost basis 17111 15282 12581 14096b) Total cost basis - 7111 - 5282 - 2581 4096BCR (total cost basis) 1.19 1.13 1.06 1.10Costing rate: Ploughing @ Tk. 741/ploughing/ha, Seed @ Tk. 39.00/kg, Compost @ Tk. 1.5/kg, Urea @ Tk. 12.00/kg, TSP @Tk. 40.00/kg, MP @ Tk. 30.00/kg, Gypsum @ Tk. 5.00/kg, Zinc Sulphate @ Tk. 60.00/kg, H. labour wage @ Tk.120.00/manday, Irrigation @ Tk. 741.00/No/ha, Grain price @ Tk. 15.00/kg, Straw @ Tk. 1.00/kg.121
Page 1 and 2:
Final Report PR #6/08Studie
Page 3 and 4:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYSTUDIES ON POLICY
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSExecutive SummaryL
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTD.)ChapterPa
Page 9 and 10:
LIST OF TABLESName of the TablesPag
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF TABLES (CONTD.)Name of the
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF ANNEXESName of the AnnexesP
Page 15 and 16:
STUDIES ON POLICY OPTION FOR QUALIT
Page 17 and 18:
1.2 Expected outputs of the studyi)
Page 19 and 20:
selected upazilas, the team selecte
Page 21 and 22:
2.10 Preparation and pre-tested of
Page 23 and 24:
3. REVIEW OF LITERATUREThe availabi
Page 25 and 26:
different storage containers ranged
Page 27 and 28:
3.1.3 Maize SeedResearch works on m
Page 29 and 30:
governments’ seed suppliers. As a
Page 31 and 32:
Therefore, under the present study
Page 33 and 34:
experience along with available inp
Page 35 and 36:
findings that the farming community
Page 37 and 38:
Table 4.1.5 Linkage of the family m
Page 39 and 40:
different hybrid varieties of rice
Page 41 and 42:
large farmers had used all types of
Page 43 and 44:
4.1.15 Seed classes used by the ric
Page 45 and 46:
BADC10%Others Farmers5%DAE5%Self80%
Page 47 and 48:
Similarly, farmers’ own seed and
Page 49 and 50:
4.1.25 Drying method used by the ri
Page 51 and 52:
But these types of storage containe
Page 53 and 54:
educed through proper processing an
Page 55 and 56:
4.1.34 Production cost and profitab
Page 57 and 58:
Table 4.1.35 Rice seed production c
Page 59 and 60:
4.1.38 Constraints to rice seed pro
Page 61 and 62:
was probably due to absorption of s
Page 63 and 64:
Table 4.2.2 Major occupation of whe
Page 65 and 66:
4.2.5 Sources of technological supp
Page 67 and 68:
Table 4.2.5 Services received from
Page 69 and 70:
Table 4.2.8 Percent of the farmers
Page 71 and 72:
Table 4.2.11 Farmers’ opinion abo
Page 73 and 74:
Table 4.2.13 Farmers’ choice prio
Page 75 and 76:
4.2.18 Percent of farmers using fer
Page 77 and 78:
4.2.20 Seed drying place of wheat a
Page 79 and 80:
30Frequency distribution20100Std. D
Page 81 and 82:
followed by plastic drum (30 points
Page 83 and 84: Table 4.2.26 Wheat seed preservatio
Page 85 and 86: Table 4.2.27 Men, women and childre
Page 87 and 88: espectively. Farmers used FYM at th
Page 89 and 90: Table 4.2.30 Wheat seed production
Page 91 and 92: the amounts of stored wheat seed fo
Page 93 and 94: 8. Termite attack at seedling Insec
Page 95 and 96: percentages of germination, moistur
Page 97 and 98: 4.3.2 Major occupation of maize far
Page 99 and 100: Table 4.3.4 Time line of maize cult
Page 101 and 102: Legend:RajshahiKishoregonjExperienc
Page 103 and 104: 4.3.9 Major cropping patterns pract
Page 105 and 106: yield and production cost and marke
Page 107 and 108: medium farmers in Rajshahi and 85%
Page 109 and 110: significantly affected the maize pr
Page 111 and 112: Harvesting and post harvest managem
Page 113 and 114: In the present study it is observed
Page 115 and 116: 4.3.25 Maize seed demand and propor
Page 117 and 118: 4.4.5 Seed purchase and sale price
Page 119 and 120: variety `Swarna’ has leaked throu
Page 121 and 122: 6. POLICY IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMEN
Page 123 and 124: Table 6.1 Proposed training program
Page 125 and 126: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSAll praises are due
Page 127 and 128: 20. Dadalani, M., M.S. Islam, I. Ah
Page 129 and 130: ANNEXESDinajpur•Birol•Bochagonj
Page 131 and 132: Annex 7. Percent of rice farmers us
Page 133: Annex 12. Boro rice grain productio
Page 137 and 138: Annex 21. Socio-economic scenario o
show all

Studies on Policy Option for Quality Seed Production and ... - NFPCSP

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?