HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES - See also - Harvard University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 349of the period but nonetheless accepted them as models, to develop newstates and urban centers.Kiev's growth was not merely as a conglomerate of villages. Urbanizationbrought about a totally new situation. In research concerning thedevelopment of early towns in Kievan Rus', two theoretical models havebeen proposed. The first model can be called the Novgorod or koncy model(Janin and Aleskovskij 1971; Kolcin and Janin 1982, pp. 104-114).Advocates of this model maintain that the early centers of Kievan Rus'developed as a result of a synoecism of a number of earlier settlements.The second model is the bipartite one (Tolocko 1985, p. 5). Advocates ofthis model maintain that the fortified center (dytynec') with an adjoiningopen settlement (posad) is the original, basic structure of all urban centersin Kievan Rus'.It is difficult to maintain that the early northern towns of Rus' developedas a result of a synoecism between a number of closely situated settlements.As Tolocko has rightly put it, at that time in Eastern Europe the town was acompletely new social phenomenon (ibid., p. 12). In the case of Novgorod,there is a growing amount of evidence of an earlier center at Gorodisce, tothe south of Novgorod (cf. Karger 1947, pp. 145-48; Nosov 1985, pp.63-64), and there are as yet no indications of early settlements that couldlater have formed Novgorod. The dichotomy proposed in the second modelis not applicable to the earliest proto-urban and urban centers of NorthernRus', like Pskov, Ladoga, and Gorodisce (the precursor of Novgorod).Also, the second model is hardly ideal for explaining the early developmentof Kiev. The later phase, or what we tentatively date as the late tenth century,certainly brought an urban structure to Kiev, which conforms to thebipartite model. The earliest phase, however, does not fit the theory well.Even if it is assumed that the urban topography was strongly influenced bythe landscape, there was a marked difference between the layout of settlementin the early versus the late phase. Kiev in the late ninth and earlytenth century cannot be analyzed simply within the framework of thedytynec' -posad dichotomy. The earliest phase in Kiev was characterizedmuch more by a concentration of political power in groups of people thanby a single center. It then rapidly attracted economically specialized individuals.The development of Kiev is the change from an originally complex andfragmented settlement area to an enormous—for its time—urban centerwith a clearly bipartite structure. Late tenth- and eleventh-century Kievstrongly influenced the layout of many towns in Kievan Rus' that began todevelop in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. At that time it became themodel city for Kievan Rus'—it was in this sense that Kiev was the truemother of the towns of Rus'.Lund <strong>University</strong>
350 JOHAN CALLMERLIST OF REFERENCESBerezovec' (Berezovec), D. T. 1962. "Raskopki v Verxnem Saltove 1959-1960gg.: Pecenezkoe vodoxranilisc'e." Kratkie soobscenija Instituta arxeologii ANUSSR, no. 12. Kiev.Bohusevyc, V. A. 1952A. "Rozkopy na hori Kyselivci." Arxeolohicni pam" jatkyURSR3. Kiev.1952B. "Pro poxodzennja i topohrafiju drevn'oho Kyjeva zaarxeolohicnymy danymy." Arxeolohija 7.1954. "Arxeolohicni rozkopy na Podoli v 1950 r." Arxeolohija 9.Borisevic, G. V. 1982. "Xoromnoe zodcestvo Novgoroda." Novgorodskij sbornik:50 let raskopok Novgoroda. Moscow.Borkovs'kyj (Borkovsky), I. 1961. "Der altbohmische Premysliden-FiirstensitzPraha." Historical. Prague.Borovs'kyj, Ja. E. 1981. "Svetskie postrojki." Novoe v arxeologii Kieva. Kiev., and Sahajdak (Sagajdak), M. A. 1985. "Arxeologiceskie issledovanijaverxnego Kieva v 1978-1982 gg." In Arxeologiceskie issledovanija Kieva1978-1983 gg. Kiev.Bulkin, V. A., Dubov, I. V., and Lebedev, G. S. 1978. Arxeolohiceskie pamjatnikiDrevnej Rusi IX- XI vekov. Leningrad.Callmer, J. 1981. "The Archaeology of Kiev ca. A.D. 500-1000: A Survey."Figura, n.s. 19. Uppsala.Fasmer, R. R. 1931. "Zavalisinskij klad kuficeskix monet VIII-IX vv." IzvestijaGosudarstvennoj akademii istorii material'noj kul'tury 7, no. 2. Moscow andLeningrad.Golubeva, L. A. 1949. "Kievskij nekropol'." Material};i issledovanija po arxeologiiSSSR, no. 11. Moscow.Gorjunov, E. A. 1975. "O pamjatnikax volyncevskogo tipa." Kratkiesoobscennija o dokladax i polevyx issledovanijax Instituta arxeologii ANSSSR, no. 144. Moscow.1981. Rannie etapy istorii slavjan Dneprovskogo Levoberezja. Leningrad.Hupalo, K. M. 1976. "Do pytannja pro formuvannja posadu dav'noho Kyjeva."Arxeolohicni doslidzennja starodav noho Kyjeva. Kiev.(Gupalo). 1982. Podol v drevnem Kieve. Kiev., and Tolocko, P. P. 1975. "Dav'nokyjivs'kyj Podil v svitli novyxarxeolohicnyx doslidzen'." Starodav'nij Kyjiv. Kiev._, and Ivakin, G. Ju. 1977. "Juvelirnye formy X veka iz Kieva." Dekorativnoeiskusstvo SSSR, 1977, no. 7. Moscow.Icenskaja, O. V. 1982. "Osobennosti pogrebal'nogo obrjada i datirovka nekotoryxucastkov Saltovskogo mogil'nika." Materialy po xronologii arxeologiceskixpamjatnikov Ukrainy. Kiev.Ivakin, G. Ju., and Stepanenko, L. Ja. 1985. "Raskopki v severozapadnoj castiPodolav 1980-1982 gg." inAIK. Kiev.Jacob, G. 1927. "Arabische Berichte von Gesandten an germanischen Fiirstenhofeaus dem 9. und 10. Jahrhundert." Quellen zur deutschen Volkskunde 1. Berlinand Leipzig.Jakobson, A. L. 1959. Rannesrednevekovyj Xersones. (=MIA, no. 63). Moscowand Leningrad.
Page 1 and 2:
HARVARDUKRAINIAN STUDIESVolume XI N
Page 4 and 5:
REVIEW ARTICLESRudnytsky's Essays i
Page 6 and 7:
A Note from the EditorsEight of the
Page 8 and 9:
THEOLOGY IN KIEV AN RUS 27121 July
Page 10 and 11:
THEOLOGY IN KIEV AN RUS 273a rough
Page 12 and 13:
THEOLOGY IN KIEV AN RUS 275there we
Page 14 and 15:
THEOLOGY IN KIEV AN RUS 277sacrific
Page 16 and 17:
THEOLOGY IN KIEV AN RUS 279ity with
Page 18 and 19:
THEOLOGY IN KIEV AN RUS 281nearly b
Page 20 and 21:
THEOLOGY IN KIEV AN RUS 283the floo
Page 22 and 23:
THEOLOGY IN KIEVAN RUS 285the clois
Page 24 and 25:
How the Conversion of Rus' Was Unde
Page 26 and 27:
THE CONVERSION OF RUS' 289tices amo
Page 28 and 29:
THE CONVERSION OF RUS' 291Although
Page 30 and 31:
THE CONVERSION OF RUS' 293Christian
Page 32 and 33:
THE CONVERSION OF RUS' 295Byzantine
Page 34 and 35:
THE CONVERSION OF RUS' 297gave the
Page 36 and 37: THE CONVERSION OF RUS' 299Without d
Page 38 and 39: THE CONVERSION OF RUS' 301emperors,
Page 40 and 41: The Sack of Kiev of 1169:Its Signif
Page 42 and 43: THE SACK OF KIEV OF 1169 305Oleksa
Page 44 and 45: THE SACK OF KIEV OF 1169 307skazani
Page 46 and 47: THE SACK OF KIEV OF 1169 309has hyp
Page 48 and 49: THE SACK OF KIEV OF 1169 311and som
Page 50 and 51: THE SACK OF KIEV OF 1169 313pal cen
Page 52 and 53: THE SACK OF KIEV OF 1169 315chronic
Page 54 and 55: Religious Sites in KievDuring the R
Page 56 and 57: RELIGIOUS SITES IN KIEV 319fraction
Page 58 and 59: RELIGIOUS SITES IN KIEV 321shrines
Page 60 and 61: The Archaeology of Kievto the End o
Page 62 and 63: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 325Traditionall
Page 64 and 65: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 327Kravcenko 19
Page 66 and 67: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 329"foundation"
Page 68 and 69: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 331settlement t
Page 70 and 71: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 333more likely
Page 72 and 73: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 335Some time in
Page 74 and 75: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 337slopes. The
Page 76 and 77: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 339Pocajna, it
Page 78 and 79: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 341seems, howev
Page 80 and 81: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 343palace build
Page 82 and 83: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 345settlement.
Page 84 and 85: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 347formed a lar
Page 88 and 89: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 351Janin, V. L.
Page 90 and 91: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 3531981D. "Mass
Page 92 and 93: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV355Fig. 2Topogra
Page 94 and 95: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV357Fig. 4The kap
Page 96 and 97: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV359Fig, 6An earl
Page 98 and 99: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV361Fig. 8The set
Page 100 and 101: ARCHAEOLOGY OF KIEV 363Fig. 10A sug
Page 102 and 103: The Masonry Churches of Medieval Ch
Page 104 and 105: MASONRY CHURCHES OF MEDIEVAL CHERNI
Page 122 and 123: MONETARY HISTORY OF KIEV IN THE PRE
Page 136 and 137:
MONETARY HISTORY OF KIEV IN THE PRE
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
THE CHRISTIANIZATION OF RUS' IN SOV
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 463Ca
Page 202 and 203:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 465He
Page 204 and 205:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 467Th
Page 206 and 207:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 469I
Page 208 and 209:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 471It
Page 210 and 211:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 473Co
Page 212 and 213:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 475(1
Page 214 and 215:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 477Ac
Page 216 and 217:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 479a
Page 218 and 219:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 4816
Page 220 and 221:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 483us
Page 222 and 223:
SMOTRYC'KYJ'S THRENOS OF 1610 485Th
Page 224 and 225:
DOCUMENTSA Missing Volume of the Ru
Page 226 and 227:
A MISSING VOLUME OF THE RUTHENIAN M
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
REVIEW ARTICLESRudnytsky's Essays i
Page 260 and 261:
ESSAYS IN MODERN UKRAINIAN HISTORY
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Critique of a Ukrainian-Russian Com
Page 268 and 269:
UKRAINIAN-RUSSIAN COMPARATIVE GRAMM
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Reviews 539and East European histor
Page 278 and 279:
Reviews 541and periodicals 6 that t
Page 280 and 281:
Reviews 543In 1935, the same year t
Page 282 and 283:
Reviews 545poem's last verse, the e
Page 284 and 285:
Reviews 547of development. Yet, car
Page 286 and 287:
Reviews 549While it is eminently re
Page 288 and 289:
Reviews 551handy reference aid. Den
Page 290 and 291:
Reviews 553THE REVIVAL OF BYZANTINE
Page 292 and 293:
Reviews 555and Voulismas's subseque
Page 294 and 295:
Reviews 557conflict between the Pol
Page 296 and 297:
Reviews 559their Catholic churches.
Page 298 and 299:
Reviews 561hostile to Communist reg
Page 300 and 301:
Reviews 563Russia meant that Ukrain
Page 302 and 303:
INDEX TO VOLUMES IX (1977-1986)A. A
Page 304 and 305:
Index to Volumes I -X (1977-1986) 5
Page 306 and 307:
Index to Volumes 1-X (1977-1986) 56
Page 308 and 309:
Index to Volumes I~X (1977-1986) 57
Page 310 and 311:
Index to Volumes I-X (1977-1986)S73
Page 312 and 313:
Index to Volumes I-X (1977-1986) 57
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
index to Volumes I-X (1977-1986) 57
Page 318 and 319:
Index to Volumes 1-X (1977-/986) 58
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
D. Notes from the EditorsIndex to V
Page 348 and 349:
Alexander A. Potebnja'sPsycholingui
show all

HARVARD UKRAINIAN STUDIES - See also - Harvard University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?