13.07.2015 Views

Changing Horizons in Geography Education - HERODOT Network ...

Changing Horizons in Geography Education - HERODOT Network ...

Changing Horizons in Geography Education - HERODOT Network ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Studies have shown that the aforementioned type of communication clearly prevails<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpersonal communication. Pease (2004) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that verbal component ofspeech makes up to 35% of communication whereas the rest occurs at a non-verballevel; Łasiński (2000) suggests it is about 50%. From a teacher’s perspective theability to read and <strong>in</strong>terpret non-verbal messages com<strong>in</strong>g from students, sometimestermed <strong>in</strong>tuition or perception, seems to be exceptionally important (Wołowik, 1998).Ignor<strong>in</strong>g signals com<strong>in</strong>g from students dur<strong>in</strong>g a lesson may result <strong>in</strong> a situation <strong>in</strong>which the planned method of presentation does not adapt and thus the educationaleffect is impaired.In the course of presentation another factor, mentioned earlier, appears i.e. distance,def<strong>in</strong>ed as personal distance from other people, someth<strong>in</strong>g that Pease (2002) calls‘territory’ and the ‘speaker’s safety zone’, whereas Hall (after Pease, 2004) namesit ‘speaker’s own space’. In the course of studies on non-verbal expression (calledproxemics after Hall) considerable significance was given to distances people whoengage <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction tend to keep between them as well as their reciprocal arrangement.Pease (2004) lists four types of spac<strong>in</strong>g zones: private (15−46 cm), personal(46−120 cm), social (120−360 cm) and public (more than 360 cm). Inevitably, each<strong>in</strong>dividual zone may determ<strong>in</strong>e the method of presentation as well as its adequatereception as they def<strong>in</strong>e the distance to listeners- students.Perception of presentation – natural barriersIn the course of every presentation there appear to be many disturbances that maymake it difficult or even impossible to communicate. Such situations are especiallytroubl<strong>in</strong>g for beg<strong>in</strong>ners, young <strong>in</strong>experienced teachers. Łasiński (2000) po<strong>in</strong>ts outto the follow<strong>in</strong>g barriers of efficient communication that may have an impact onperception of presentation (Table 1)Table 1. Barriers to effective communication (Łasiński (2000), modified)Semantic Psychological Physical and external• Lack of professionalpreparation• Distorted <strong>in</strong>formation• Multitude of <strong>in</strong>formation• Incomprehensible subjectmatter• Incomprehensible term<strong>in</strong>ologyor language• Speaker’s speech defect• Negative attitude• Shyness• Lack of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> thesubject• Excessive emotional<strong>in</strong>volvement• Disregard for listeners• Dogmatic th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g• Lack of concentration• Monotonous speech• Inability to focus onlisten<strong>in</strong>g• Tiredness• Noise• Whisper<strong>in</strong>g• Temperature• Venue• Time of day• Power cut or computerbreak-down• Too many listeners• Inadequate room arrangement• Time pressure56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!