13.07.2015 Views

Changing Horizons in Geography Education - HERODOT Network ...

Changing Horizons in Geography Education - HERODOT Network ...

Changing Horizons in Geography Education - HERODOT Network ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1. Differences <strong>in</strong> estimation of questions’ difficulty amongst different grades82Type of questions \ Grade A B C DTasks that are test<strong>in</strong>g the geographical facts -0.36 -0.14 -0.01 -0.22Tasks that are demand<strong>in</strong>g the analysis of situation 0.41 0.04 0.14 -0.22Tasks that are demand<strong>in</strong>g the generalization 0.39 0.18 -0.22 -0.33Map questions -0.04 0.00 -0.12 0.57Identify<strong>in</strong>g the pictures -0.37 -0.10 0.20 0.20Rat<strong>in</strong>gs’ average for a given grade: 2.90 3.05 3.33 3.01Regard<strong>in</strong>g the fieldwork, the students had to <strong>in</strong>dicate which exercise was the easiestand which one was the most difficult. Practically all exercises were mentioned, the determ<strong>in</strong>ationof bear<strong>in</strong>gs was most numerous amongst the “easy” tasks and compilation oflandscape profile amongst the most difficult tasks. We were also <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> participants’op<strong>in</strong>ions on the proportion of events <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al. To obta<strong>in</strong> more reliable quantitative estimateswe used Saaty’s method of Analytical Hierarchy Process by means of Idrisi softwaretools (Eastman, 2003). In total, 28% of respondents showed consistent assessments andthe figures presented <strong>in</strong> “Desirable” section of Table 2 were based on these answers only.The real structure is shown accord<strong>in</strong>g to an average sum of po<strong>in</strong>ts.Almost all (95%) students were us<strong>in</strong>g computers at home, 84% of these computerswere connected to Internet. Therefore we might presume that their computer literacyis relatively high. However, the questions about computer use show that their knowledgeis narrow, especially from the po<strong>in</strong>t of view of geographical applications.Although 83% of students have used the Internet to f<strong>in</strong>d geographical illustrations(and 72% to f<strong>in</strong>d any map), only 16% of them were do<strong>in</strong>g it cont<strong>in</strong>uously. Several<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g and useful native (Estonian) electronic textbooks and web sites offer<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>teractive computer maps were used only by one quarter of the students. It is probablethat students are not sufficiently <strong>in</strong>formed about such possibilities. Also, a serious factfor organizers to consider is that students were <strong>in</strong> surpris<strong>in</strong>gly undivided op<strong>in</strong>ion thatcomputer-based exercises <strong>in</strong> the written test were a rather undesirable experience.Table 2. Events’ structure (per cent) of f<strong>in</strong>al competitionDesirableDesirableRealGrade Written test Fieldwork Orienteer<strong>in</strong>g QuizGymnasium 47.4 34.4 9.3 9.19 th Form 51.6 32.4 6.4 9.48 th Form 45.9 33.7 9.3 11.17 th Form 42.8 31.2 10.0 16.0Average 47.0 33.0 9.0 11.0m<strong>in</strong> 15.0 4.0 3.0 4.0max 69.0 63.0 39.0 28.0Gymnasium 57.0 33.0 – 10.09 th Form 60.0 29.0 – 11.08 th Form 65.0 25.0 – 10.07 th Form 64.0 26.0 – 11.0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!