13.07.2015 Views

The planet we live on: The beginnings of the Earth Sciences

The planet we live on: The beginnings of the Earth Sciences

The planet we live on: The beginnings of the Earth Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1.70: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> change <strong>of</strong> amm<strong>on</strong>oid suture lines over time, from <strong>the</strong> simple sutures <strong>of</strong>g<strong>on</strong>iatites, comm<strong>on</strong> around 350 milli<strong>on</strong> years ago in <strong>the</strong> left hand diagram, to <strong>the</strong> morecomplex sutures <strong>of</strong> ceratites, comm<strong>on</strong> around 240 milli<strong>on</strong> years ago in <strong>the</strong> centre to <strong>the</strong>very complex sutures <strong>of</strong> amm<strong>on</strong>ites, found in 190 milli<strong>on</strong> year old rocks in <strong>the</strong> right handdiagram. Ribs <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> outsides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fossils are shown as dashed lines.at fixed rates over time. So, if <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> can find a rock or mineral that c<strong>on</strong>tains radioactiveatoms, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> can find out what proporti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m has decayed, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> also know <strong>the</strong>rate <strong>of</strong> decay, <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> can work out <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock. For example, potassium (with <strong>the</strong>chemical symbol, K) has a radioactive comp<strong>on</strong>ent and is comm<strong>on</strong>ly found in igneous rockslike granite. When <strong>the</strong> granite first forms, <strong>the</strong> potassium-c<strong>on</strong>taining minerals c<strong>on</strong>tain <strong>on</strong>lypotassium. But <strong>the</strong> radioactive part <strong>of</strong> potassium decays to arg<strong>on</strong> (Ar) over time. So, if<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> measure <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> potassium that should have been in <strong>the</strong> rock, and <strong>the</strong> amount<strong>of</strong> arg<strong>on</strong> it now c<strong>on</strong>tains, <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> can work out <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock. Half <strong>the</strong> radioactivepotassium would decay to arg<strong>on</strong> in 1260 milli<strong>on</strong> years, so an igneous rock with halfradioactive potassium/half arg<strong>on</strong> must have crystallised 1260 milli<strong>on</strong> years ago.Unfortunately <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> can <strong>on</strong>ly apply this method to igneous rocks and some metamorphicrocks that c<strong>on</strong>tain potassium (and <strong>the</strong> unusual sedimentary rock, greensand). This is true<strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r radiometric methods as <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>ll - <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> can <strong>on</strong>ly apply <strong>the</strong>m to certain sorts <strong>of</strong> rocks.This means, for example, that <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> usually can’t find <strong>the</strong> absolute ages <strong>of</strong> sedimentary rocksand fossils directly. If a bed <strong>of</strong> sedimentary rock c<strong>on</strong>taining a useful correlati<strong>on</strong> fossilhappened to have a lava flow below and above it, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> could work out <strong>the</strong> radiometricages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lava flows, <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> would have a good idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> absolute age <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rock and itsfossil. Ho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>ver, this is very unusual and, even when it does happen, <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lavaflows may be several milli<strong>on</strong> years apart, so that <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> can <strong>on</strong>ly find <strong>the</strong> approximate age <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> rock and fossil.Never<strong>the</strong>less, geologists have been working <strong>on</strong> this problem for many years, and nowhave a good idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ages <strong>of</strong> key correlati<strong>on</strong> fossils and <strong>the</strong> rocks in which <strong>the</strong>y arefound. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se ages have been added to <strong>the</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al geological time scale, so as <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>llas knowing <strong>the</strong> sequence <strong>of</strong> global geological events, <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> also know when in <strong>the</strong> geologicalpast <strong>the</strong>y actually happened (Figure 1.71).53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!