13.07.2015 Views

The planet we live on: The beginnings of the Earth Sciences

The planet we live on: The beginnings of the Earth Sciences

The planet we live on: The beginnings of the Earth Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• <strong>the</strong> l<strong>on</strong>gitude <strong>of</strong> Greenland had been measured in 1820 and 1870 and Wegenermeasured it again <strong>on</strong> his 1906/1908 expediti<strong>on</strong>; this sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>d that Greenland wasmoving; ho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>ver, <strong>the</strong>se measurements <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re later shown to be wr<strong>on</strong>g.With all this excellent evidence, it is difficult to see why Wegener’s ‘c<strong>on</strong>tinental drift’<strong>the</strong>ory was not believed. Some scientists argued that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>’s crust was not str<strong>on</strong>genough to form slabs that could be moved across <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>, whilst o<strong>the</strong>rs said that <strong>the</strong>rewas no force str<strong>on</strong>g enough to make <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinents plough through <strong>the</strong> ocean floors, asWegener thought. Meanwhile, o<strong>the</strong>rs argued that <strong>the</strong> geological features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>could be formed by up and down movements al<strong>on</strong>e. O<strong>the</strong>r factors may have been thatWegener was German, when Germany had just been involved in <strong>the</strong> First World War,he was a meteorologist by training, and he first published all his work in German. As aresult, Wegener’s work was disregarded at <strong>the</strong> time, and Wegener was forgotten.War played an important part in <strong>the</strong> nextpart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> story too, since s<strong>on</strong>ar developedduring <strong>the</strong> Sec<strong>on</strong>d World War fordetecting submarines using sound waves,was used in <strong>the</strong> 1950s to map <strong>the</strong> floors <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> oceans. This sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>d that <strong>the</strong> oceanfloors <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re not flat, but had l<strong>on</strong>g mountainranges, called oceanic ridges, anddeep trenches. Meanwhile, magnetometersthat had been developed to detect<strong>the</strong> magnetism <strong>of</strong> submarines also sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>dstrange features, when used to map <strong>the</strong>ocean floors.In 1962, Harry Hess, an American geologist,published a paper suggesting that <strong>the</strong>ocean rocks <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re not ancient, as most peoplehad thought beforehand, but <strong>the</strong>y <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>regeologically young. He proposed that newocean floor was formed at oceanic ridgesnear <strong>the</strong> centres <strong>of</strong> oceans, and was carriedFigure 3.6: A ship used for ocean surveyingin <strong>the</strong> 1960s, mapping <strong>the</strong> sea floor and measuringocean-floor magnetism.sideways away from <strong>the</strong>se ridges until it sank into oceanic trenches. This was his ‘SeaFloor Spreading’ <strong>the</strong>ory, but Hess was able to publish no str<strong>on</strong>g evidence to supporthis <strong>the</strong>ory, apart from <strong>the</strong> shapes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ocean floors. It was a year later, in 1963, that twoBritish geologists, Fred Vine and Drumm<strong>on</strong>d Mat<strong>the</strong>ws, published <strong>the</strong>ir work <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> magneticfeatures <strong>the</strong>y had mapped <strong>on</strong> ocean floors. It was already known that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>’smagnetism had ‘flipped’ many times in <strong>the</strong> past, with <strong>the</strong> current magnetic south polebecoming <strong>the</strong> magnetic north pole, and vice versa. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> data that Vine and Mat<strong>the</strong>wshad collected sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>d that <strong>the</strong>re <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re stripes or bands <strong>of</strong> magnetism running parallel to<strong>the</strong> oceanic ridges. Some <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re wide and some <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re narrow, but <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stripeswas <strong>the</strong> same <strong>on</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ridges. This could be explained if <strong>the</strong> new ocean floormade at <strong>the</strong> ridges became magnetised as it was formed. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> rocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ocean floor77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!