• <strong>the</strong> l<strong>on</strong>gitude <strong>of</strong> Greenland had been measured in 1820 and 1870 and Wegenermeasured it again <strong>on</strong> his 1906/1908 expediti<strong>on</strong>; this sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>d that Greenland wasmoving; ho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>ver, <strong>the</strong>se measurements <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re later shown to be wr<strong>on</strong>g.With all this excellent evidence, it is difficult to see why Wegener’s ‘c<strong>on</strong>tinental drift’<strong>the</strong>ory was not believed. Some scientists argued that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>’s crust was not str<strong>on</strong>genough to form slabs that could be moved across <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>, whilst o<strong>the</strong>rs said that <strong>the</strong>rewas no force str<strong>on</strong>g enough to make <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tinents plough through <strong>the</strong> ocean floors, asWegener thought. Meanwhile, o<strong>the</strong>rs argued that <strong>the</strong> geological features <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>could be formed by up and down movements al<strong>on</strong>e. O<strong>the</strong>r factors may have been thatWegener was German, when Germany had just been involved in <strong>the</strong> First World War,he was a meteorologist by training, and he first published all his work in German. As aresult, Wegener’s work was disregarded at <strong>the</strong> time, and Wegener was forgotten.War played an important part in <strong>the</strong> nextpart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> story too, since s<strong>on</strong>ar developedduring <strong>the</strong> Sec<strong>on</strong>d World War fordetecting submarines using sound waves,was used in <strong>the</strong> 1950s to map <strong>the</strong> floors <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> oceans. This sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>d that <strong>the</strong> oceanfloors <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re not flat, but had l<strong>on</strong>g mountainranges, called oceanic ridges, anddeep trenches. Meanwhile, magnetometersthat had been developed to detect<strong>the</strong> magnetism <strong>of</strong> submarines also sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>dstrange features, when used to map <strong>the</strong>ocean floors.In 1962, Harry Hess, an American geologist,published a paper suggesting that <strong>the</strong>ocean rocks <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re not ancient, as most peoplehad thought beforehand, but <strong>the</strong>y <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>regeologically young. He proposed that newocean floor was formed at oceanic ridgesnear <strong>the</strong> centres <strong>of</strong> oceans, and was carriedFigure 3.6: A ship used for ocean surveyingin <strong>the</strong> 1960s, mapping <strong>the</strong> sea floor and measuringocean-floor magnetism.sideways away from <strong>the</strong>se ridges until it sank into oceanic trenches. This was his ‘SeaFloor Spreading’ <strong>the</strong>ory, but Hess was able to publish no str<strong>on</strong>g evidence to supporthis <strong>the</strong>ory, apart from <strong>the</strong> shapes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ocean floors. It was a year later, in 1963, that twoBritish geologists, Fred Vine and Drumm<strong>on</strong>d Mat<strong>the</strong>ws, published <strong>the</strong>ir work <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> magneticfeatures <strong>the</strong>y had mapped <strong>on</strong> ocean floors. It was already known that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>’smagnetism had ‘flipped’ many times in <strong>the</strong> past, with <strong>the</strong> current magnetic south polebecoming <strong>the</strong> magnetic north pole, and vice versa. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> data that Vine and Mat<strong>the</strong>wshad collected sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>d that <strong>the</strong>re <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re stripes or bands <strong>of</strong> magnetism running parallel to<strong>the</strong> oceanic ridges. Some <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re wide and some <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re narrow, but <strong>the</strong> pattern <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stripeswas <strong>the</strong> same <strong>on</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ridges. This could be explained if <strong>the</strong> new ocean floormade at <strong>the</strong> ridges became magnetised as it was formed. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> rocks <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ocean floor77
Figure 3.7: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>,showing <strong>the</strong> lithosphere and as<strong>the</strong>nosphere(not to scale).Figure 3.8:mantle.C<strong>on</strong>vecti<strong>on</strong> currents in <strong>the</strong><strong>the</strong>refore recorded <strong>the</strong> magnetism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> at <strong>the</strong> time and held this record as <strong>the</strong>ocean floor was moved sideways, producing <strong>the</strong> series <strong>of</strong> stripes <strong>the</strong>y had detected. Thiswas excellent evidence to support Hess’s ‘Sea Floor Spreading’ <strong>the</strong>ory.It was later in <strong>the</strong> 1960s that <strong>the</strong> Canadian geologist, John Tuzo Wils<strong>on</strong>, put toge<strong>the</strong>r hiswork <strong>on</strong> volcanic hotspots with that <strong>of</strong> Wegener, Hess, Vine and Mat<strong>the</strong>ws and o<strong>the</strong>rs tosuggest that <strong>the</strong> whole <strong>Earth</strong> was covered by a series <strong>of</strong> slabs <strong>of</strong> rock that moved sideways.His ideas <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re later called plate tect<strong>on</strong>ics, <strong>the</strong> slabs <strong>of</strong> rock are plates and <strong>the</strong>ir movementis tect<strong>on</strong>ics. He realised that plate margins are found not <strong>on</strong>ly at ridges and trenches,but also where <strong>the</strong>re are l<strong>on</strong>g faults in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>, like <strong>the</strong> San Andreas Fault in <strong>the</strong> USA.<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se large faults at plate boundaries he called transform faults.<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> new ‘<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>ory <strong>of</strong> Plate Tect<strong>on</strong>ics’ included Hess’s ‘Sea Floor Spreading’ <strong>the</strong>ory as<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>ll as much <strong>of</strong> Wegener’s ‘C<strong>on</strong>tinental Drift’ <strong>the</strong>ory. It sho<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>d that c<strong>on</strong>tinents didn’tplough through oceans, as Wegener had thought, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re carried <strong>on</strong> plates over <strong>the</strong><strong>Earth</strong>’s surface. It also provided <strong>the</strong> mechanism for sideways movement that Wegenercouldn’t find, since <strong>the</strong> plates <str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g>re carried by currents in <strong>the</strong> mantle beneath <strong>the</strong>m.It took a few years for geologists across <strong>the</strong> world to change <strong>the</strong>ir ideas, but by <strong>the</strong> mid-1970s most geologists believed <strong>the</strong> new <strong>the</strong>ory. So<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory that <strong>the</strong> whole surface<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong> had been in sideways moti<strong>on</strong> for milli<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> years, was being used to explainmany puzzling geological features. Like Hutt<strong>on</strong>’s ‘Principle <strong>of</strong> Uniformitarianism’ androck cycle ideas before it, plate tect<strong>on</strong>ics revoluti<strong>on</strong>ised <strong>the</strong> thinking <strong>of</strong> geologists, andprovided great insights into <strong>Earth</strong> processes that are still being used today.Since <strong>the</strong> 1970s geologists have c<strong>on</strong>tinued to investigate <strong>the</strong> details <strong>of</strong> plate tect<strong>on</strong>ics and<str<strong>on</strong>g>we</str<strong>on</strong>g> now have a much better idea <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> plate tect<strong>on</strong>ics machine works, creating newplate material in some parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>, and destroying it elsewhere, whilst plates slidepast each o<strong>the</strong>r in o<strong>the</strong>r areas. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> plates are about 100km thick and are composed <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>crust and <strong>the</strong> upper part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mantle, toge<strong>the</strong>r called <strong>the</strong> lithosphere (‘litho’ is Greekfor ‘st<strong>on</strong>e’ and it is a sphere because it forms <strong>the</strong> outer part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Earth</strong>). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> lithosphere78
- Page 1 and 2:
Basic Books in ScienceBook 6<strong
- Page 3 and 4:
BASIC BOOKS IN SCIENCE- a Series of
- Page 5 and 6:
BASIC BOOKS IN SCIENCE- a Series of
- Page 7 and 8:
Looking ahead - If you came across
- Page 9 and 10:
3.2 Plate tectonics (20th Century)
- Page 11 and 12:
1.30 Coal seams in an opencast coal
- Page 13 and 14:
3.4 Alfred Wegener, the polar explo
- Page 15 and 16:
5.14 A GPS remote volcano monitorin
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 1.2:minerals.A sandstone roc
- Page 19 and 20:
Even diamond can have different col
- Page 21 and 22:
Figure 1.8: A red garnet crystal in
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 1.12: Crystals of minerals i
- Page 25 and 26:
Hematite, Fe 2 O 3 - earthy red, me
- Page 27 and 28:
Figure 1.17: Sedimentary rocks show
- Page 29 and 30:
Figure 1.20: A close up view of a p
- Page 31 and 32:
Figure 1.26: Ancient wave ripple ma
- Page 33 and 34:
Figure 1.30: Coal seams in an openc
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 1.32: Close up view of a pie
- Page 37 and 38:
Figure 1.35: A fossil colonial cora
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 1.38: Fossil ammonites, indi
- Page 41 and 42: Figure 1.39: ‘Massive’ igneous
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 1.41: A close up view of a p
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 1.44: A basalt flow that coo
- Page 47 and 48: Figure 1.47: Deposit of volcanic as
- Page 49 and 50: Figure 1.49: An old slate quarry, s
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 1.51: Slate, a low-grade met
- Page 53 and 54: Figure 1.53: Schist, a medium-grade
- Page 55 and 56: Figure 1.56: Metaquartzite, produce
- Page 57 and 58: Figure 1.58: A region of folded roc
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 1.61: A normal fault. This s
- Page 61 and 62: Figure 1.64: An unconformity. Older
- Page 63 and 64: proper geological maps. Fossils hav
- Page 65 and 66: Cephalopods are not extinct, but th
- Page 67 and 68: Figure 1.68: A shelled cephalopod f
- Page 69 and 70: You can try the rock sequencing pri
- Page 71 and 72: Chapter 2Reading landscapes: how la
- Page 73 and 74: Figure 2.3: Rock fragments loosened
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 2.6: The jo
- Page 77 and 78: Figure 2.10: The m
- Page 79 and 80: are forming them. Similarly the sha
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 2.19: This photo was taken f
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 2.25: Dinosaur tracks conser
- Page 85 and 86: • On coastal sections, whenever p
- Page 87 and 88: found evidence that the Earth was a
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 3.3: James Hutton, the ‘Fo
- Page 91: Figure 3.5: A page of Wegener’s 1
- Page 95 and 96: Figure 3.10: The r
- Page 97 and 98: Figure 3.13: The m
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 3.15: The S
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 3.19: An ocean versus contin
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 3.23: Map of the major tecto
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 3.26: Global temperature cha
- Page 107 and 108: Figure 3.29: A computer generated p
- Page 109 and 110: Figure 3.31: The
- Page 111 and 112: planet extended th
- Page 113 and 114: Figure 4.1: William Smith’s geolo
- Page 115 and 116: Millionsof yearsago (Ma)01000Some M
- Page 117 and 118: ocks whilst the first definite plan
- Page 119 and 120: Figure 4.9: The ch
- Page 121 and 122: Figure 4.12: The 4
- Page 123 and 124: Millionsof years Some Major Earth E
- Page 125 and 126: Figure 5.2: Strike-slip movement (r
- Page 127 and 128: Figure 5.4: The So
- Page 129 and 130: Figure 5.6: An ash eruption rising
- Page 131 and 132: Figure 5.10: A hazard zone map of t
- Page 133 and 134: isk to humans. The
- Page 135 and 136: Figure 5.14: A GPS (global satellit
- Page 137 and 138: None of these methods has yet prove
- Page 139 and 140: Figure 5.17: A windfarm in Ireland.
- Page 141 and 142: Figure 5.19: A beautifully preserve
- Page 143 and 144:
Another ‘missing link’ find has
- Page 145 and 146:
Figure 5.22: A dinosaur reconstruct
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 5.25: A working aggregate-pr
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 5.26: The E
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 6Understanding what geologi
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 6.2: A drilling rig used for
- Page 155 and 156:
When an oil/gas field has been foun
- Page 157 and 158:
Figure 6.6: Groundwater flowing out
- Page 159 and 160:
Dam disaster in Italy, when the wav
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure 6.10: A slab foundation, bui
- Page 163 and 164:
An example of this is investigation
- Page 165 and 166:
GlossaryAbsolute age The</s
- Page 167 and 168:
Carbon capture The
- Page 169 and 170:
Crustal shortening This results of
- Page 171 and 172:
Evaporite deposits (or evaporites)
- Page 173 and 174:
Geophysical survey Using the method
- Page 175 and 176:
“Integrated waste management” <
- Page 177 and 178:
Metamorphism The r
- Page 179 and 180:
Pore spaces (or pores) Gaps bet<str
- Page 181 and 182:
Saltation Sediment movement by flui
- Page 183 and 184:
Suspension Sediment movement by flu
- Page 185 and 186:
AcknowledgementsPermission to repri
- Page 187 and 188:
Figure 2.3 A scree slope. Photo ID:
- Page 189 and 190:
Figure 1.15a Hematite.Figure 1.15b
- Page 191 and 192:
Figure 1.28 Dune cross bedding in s
- Page 193 and 194:
Figure 3.18 An island arc volcano,
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure 5.21 Excavations at the dino