FULL VERSION - European Commission - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 6: Intercultural and Multilingual dialogue between EuropeanschoolsAdministrating Organisation & Partners(Countries) involved:Secondary School I.E.S. Quatro Caminos deDon Benito (Spain)Escola Secundaria Braamcamp Freire-Pontinha, Lisbono (Portugal)State secondary school “C.Cavour” in Modena(Italy)Project Location(s) (Country) & Duration:Spain, Portugal, ItalyTwo-year project comprising three internationalmeetings using the international language,EsperantoPlease specify the Target Group(s) of theproject:Students and their teachers who are learningEsperanto to communicate internationallyTopics / aims of the project:Promotion of intulcultural understanding betweenstudents; interchange of cultural, linguistic andhistorical experiences; critical assessment of humanrights and the rights of children through internationaldebate between the studentsFinancing:European Commission through its MemberState representationsContact / Website:http://www.multlingve.eu/index.phpkMain reason(s) why your project is a bestpractice example:Through the use of the international, nondiscriminatorybridge language, Esperanto,our project is really succeeding in overcomingthe communication barriers within theEuropean Union, and contributing to theconscious strengthening of Europeancitizenship.Our students experience the importance ofteamwork and group work and they see the itis possible to solve the problems ofinternational communication when allcommunicate on the basis of equality andthere is no dominant language or group.Sustainability:Is a continuation of the Project foreseen?Yes, even if unofficially. In any case, theculural work which has been initiated willcertainly encourage the continuation ofinternational youth contacts, which will furtherstrengthen intercultural and multilingualProject Objectives and Description:The partner schools use new communicationtechnologies (e-mail and video-conferencing) asoften as possible. The students very activelycooperate in publicising the results of theinternational meetings in the newspapers.Give another good practice example you knowof:Three years ago our Italian secondary school“Cavour” in Modena participated in the Comenius 2project AKEL (Alternativa Komunikado inter EŭropajLernejoj – alternative communication betweenEuropean schools) and in its six internationalgatherings in Bulgaria, Italy, the UK and Spain, therewere hearing-impaired students. We therefore usedCivil Society Platform on Multilingualism 70APPENDIX to Policy Recommendations06/06/2011 – FINAL VERSION
dialogue.Possible follow-up Project:During our international meetings a significantamount of time is dedicate to getting to knowthe host country. The friendly relationsbetween the three schools are continuingthrough correspondence and other forms ofcontact.Italian sign language to communicate.What changes would you like to see (and bywhat actors, at what levels) that will help you doyour work better ?We would like to see our working language,Esperanto (much more easily learned than anational language) more widely accepted forinternational communication.Civil Society Platform on Multilingualism 71APPENDIX to Policy Recommendations06/06/2011 – FINAL VERSION
Page 1 and 2:
Civil Society Platform on Multiling
Page 3:
1.3 Post-Lisbon scenario: a "new ri
Page 8 and 9:
languages, and on best practices in
Page 10 and 11:
On Translation and Terminology*Full
Page 12 and 13:
Recommendations1 EU language plan t
Page 14 and 15:
Introduction“(The Union) …shall
Page 16 and 17:
flower. The popularity of a garden
Page 18 and 19:
Concern that multilingualism was be
Page 20 and 21:
1.6 Sub-group feedbackThe responses
Page 22 and 23:
discrimination in favour of RMLs. S
Page 24 and 25:
3.3 Sub-group feedbackGroup members
Page 26 and 27:
Slovenian or the RMLs. In this resp
Page 28 and 29:
5.3 Linguistic ObservatorySeveral o
Page 30 and 31:
Work group on Language Diversity an
Page 32 and 33:
understand people from other cultur
Page 34:
target groups are not exclusive amo
Page 39 and 40:
1 Defining the task of the Work Gro
Page 41 and 42:
2.2 Work methodologyWG1 was initial
Page 43 and 44:
articles. 69 The only other languag
Page 45 and 46:
education in European schools is ca
Page 47 and 48:
The question of what role language
Page 49 and 50:
trainees; Offer training mechanisms
Page 51 and 52:
investigating expectations and asse
Page 53 and 54:
learning. The key of course is the
Page 55 and 56:
As a pedagogy this education promot
Page 57 and 58:
mechanism to disseminate best pract
Page 59 and 60:
3 Education and training Mobility g
Page 61 and 62:
In order to facilitate the circulat
Page 63 and 64:
target groups (content creator or c
Page 65 and 66:
Civil Society Platform onMultilingu
Page 67 and 68:
WORKING GROUP ON LANGUAGE PLANNING
Page 69 and 70:
(6.2) Linguistic rights for all EU
Page 71 and 72:
cost-benefit analysis comparing Eng
Page 73 and 74:
(a) Constantly insisting that its i
Page 75 and 76:
Hicks, Davyth 2005 Cornish: languag
Page 77 and 78:
WORKING GROUP ON LANGUAGE DIVERSITY
Page 79 and 80:
4.1 In which way do you think this
Page 81 and 82:
8 What should the European Union do
Page 83 and 84: 10 What are the most common barrier
Page 85 and 86: Additional questions concerning lan
Page 87 and 88: References 8EU official documentsEu
Page 89 and 90: WORKING GROUP ON EDUCATIONANNEX 6.1
Page 91 and 92: 27. In which way are there constrai
Page 93 and 94: 8. On what topics is your instituti
Page 95 and 96: Annex 6.4 GROUP MEMBERS′ POSITION
Page 97 and 98: water, and one begins skiing on the
Page 99 and 100: Cor van der Meer - Mercator Europea
Page 101 and 102: supported study completed in 2006 (
Page 103 and 104: Finally, one of the greatest challe
Page 105 and 106: Marta Lottes - European Association
Page 107 and 108: o More flexible provision of langua
Page 109 and 110: ) An international THEATRE YOUTH FO
Page 111 and 112: Pasporta Servo http://www.pasportas
Page 113 and 114: interpretation and reporting system
Page 115 and 116: proficiency in a particular languag
Page 117 and 118: of mediating competence. This will
Page 119 and 120: Annex 6.5 BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLESBES
Page 121 and 122: extended and systematic research on
Page 123 and 124: BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 2: Laying see
Page 125 and 126: - Bonjour, monsieur l’facteur, av
Page 127 and 128: BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 3: Non formal
Page 129 and 130: BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 4: Multiplica
Page 131 and 132: Possible follow-up Project:The even
Page 133: Foundation Holdler ‘68Main reason
Page 137 and 138: WORKING GROUP ON TRANSLATION AND TE
Page 139: Sutton, Geoffrey, 2008. Concise Enc
show all

FULL VERSION - European Commission - Europa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?