FULL VERSION - European Commission - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ContentsINTRODUCTION 5Overall Aspects 6Which languages? 6Balance: unity and diversity 6Citizen-centred and goal-oriented 6Cross-linkage with other policies 6Subsidiarity and actors 6KEY RECOMMENDATIONS 7On Language Policy and Planning 71 EU language plan to promote equality and usage of Europe's languagesand to safeguard Europe's endangered languages 72 Permanent Platform of EU level language NGOs 73 Linguistic Observatory 7On Language Diversity and Social Inclusion 81 Projects to enhance social inclusion of disadvantaged groups 82 Foster bottom-up approach 83 Functional language learning 8On Education 91 Research 92 Policy 93 Best Practices 9On Translation and Terminology 91 Measures to be taken to promote a more equal exchangebetween countries and cultures in both literary and non-literary translation 102 Education and training 103 Research and development of translation technologies 10GROUP REPORTS 11WORK GROUP ON LANGUAGE PLANNING AND POLICY 11Recommendations 121 EU language plan 132 Structural changes 133 Linguistic Observatory 134 Direct support for endangered languages 135 Language Ombudsman 136 Working towards an EU Directive against language discrimination 13Introduction 141 Language planning and policy in the EU 141.1 Overview 151.2 Commission initiatives 17Civil Society Platform on Multilingualism: 2Policy Recommendations for the Promotion of Multilingualism in the European Union 06/06/10 – FULL VERSION
1.3 Post-Lisbon scenario: a "new rights architecture" 181.4 European trends 181.5 Lisbon Strategy, multilingualism policy and the effect on languages 191.6 Sub-group feedback 202 Linguistic rights and ending language based discrimination, current issues 202.1 Overview: existing rights base 202.2 Measures to support lesser used languages 212.3 Lesser used languages still in danger in the EU 222.4 Immigrant languages 222.5 Feedback 223 Bi-, multi- and plurilingualism, EU initiatives 233.1 Monolingualism and bilingualism 233.2 Promoting EU initiatives: personal adoptive language (PAL),cross-border languages, mother tongue plus two 233.3 Feedback 244 Further Challenges 244.1 “All languages are equal” but some are more equal than others 244.2 Endangered languages, the ones that need funding the most 244.3 English as lingua franca and approaches to fair linguistic communication 244.4 Meaningful multilingualism 254.5 Sub-group feedback 265 Recommendations 265.1 Promoting equality and using RMLs and smaller state languages 265.2 EU Agency for Linguistic Diversity 275.3 Linguistic Observatory 285.4 Direct support for endangered languages 285.5 Language Ombudsman 285.6 EU Directive on language rights and the abolition of linguistic discrimination 29WORK GROUP ON LANGUAGE DIVERSITY AND SOCIAL INCLUSION 301 Introduction 302 General considerations 303 Group Work on Language Diversity and Social Inclusion 324 Additional considerations 355 Recommendations 36WORK GROUP ON EDUCATION 381 Defining the task of the Work Group on Education 392 Conceptual framework and work methodology 402.1 The notions of multilingualism and education 402.2 Work methodology 413 Survey of results and conclusions 423.1 Discussion of responses to the survey questionnaire 433.2 Responses to the general questions 444 Proposal 44Civil Society Platform on Multilingualism: 3Policy Recommendations for the Promotion of Multilingualism in the European Union 06/06/10 – FULL VERSION
Page 1: Civil Society Platform on Multiling
Page 8 and 9: languages, and on best practices in
Page 10 and 11: On Translation and Terminology*Full
Page 12 and 13: Recommendations1 EU language plan t
Page 14 and 15: Introduction“(The Union) …shall
Page 16 and 17: flower. The popularity of a garden
Page 18 and 19: Concern that multilingualism was be
Page 20 and 21: 1.6 Sub-group feedbackThe responses
Page 22 and 23: discrimination in favour of RMLs. S
Page 24 and 25: 3.3 Sub-group feedbackGroup members
Page 26 and 27: Slovenian or the RMLs. In this resp
Page 28 and 29: 5.3 Linguistic ObservatorySeveral o
Page 30 and 31: Work group on Language Diversity an
Page 32 and 33: understand people from other cultur
Page 34: target groups are not exclusive amo
Page 39 and 40: 1 Defining the task of the Work Gro
Page 41 and 42: 2.2 Work methodologyWG1 was initial
Page 43 and 44: articles. 69 The only other languag
Page 45 and 46: education in European schools is ca
Page 47 and 48: The question of what role language
Page 49 and 50: trainees; Offer training mechanisms
Page 51 and 52: investigating expectations and asse
Page 53 and 54:
learning. The key of course is the
Page 55 and 56:
As a pedagogy this education promot
Page 57 and 58:
mechanism to disseminate best pract
Page 59 and 60:
3 Education and training Mobility g
Page 61 and 62:
In order to facilitate the circulat
Page 63 and 64:
target groups (content creator or c
Page 65 and 66:
Civil Society Platform onMultilingu
Page 67 and 68:
WORKING GROUP ON LANGUAGE PLANNING
Page 69 and 70:
(6.2) Linguistic rights for all EU
Page 71 and 72:
cost-benefit analysis comparing Eng
Page 73 and 74:
(a) Constantly insisting that its i
Page 75 and 76:
Hicks, Davyth 2005 Cornish: languag
Page 77 and 78:
WORKING GROUP ON LANGUAGE DIVERSITY
Page 79 and 80:
4.1 In which way do you think this
Page 81 and 82:
8 What should the European Union do
Page 83 and 84:
10 What are the most common barrier
Page 85 and 86:
Additional questions concerning lan
Page 87 and 88:
References 8EU official documentsEu
Page 89 and 90:
WORKING GROUP ON EDUCATIONANNEX 6.1
Page 91 and 92:
27. In which way are there constrai
Page 93 and 94:
8. On what topics is your instituti
Page 95 and 96:
Annex 6.4 GROUP MEMBERS′ POSITION
Page 97 and 98:
water, and one begins skiing on the
Page 99 and 100:
Cor van der Meer - Mercator Europea
Page 101 and 102:
supported study completed in 2006 (
Page 103 and 104:
Finally, one of the greatest challe
Page 105 and 106:
Marta Lottes - European Association
Page 107 and 108:
o More flexible provision of langua
Page 109 and 110:
) An international THEATRE YOUTH FO
Page 111 and 112:
Pasporta Servo http://www.pasportas
Page 113 and 114:
interpretation and reporting system
Page 115 and 116:
proficiency in a particular languag
Page 117 and 118:
of mediating competence. This will
Page 119 and 120:
Annex 6.5 BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLESBES
Page 121 and 122:
extended and systematic research on
Page 123 and 124:
BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 2: Laying see
Page 125 and 126:
- Bonjour, monsieur l’facteur, av
Page 127 and 128:
BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 3: Non formal
Page 129 and 130:
BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 4: Multiplica
Page 131 and 132:
Possible follow-up Project:The even
Page 133 and 134:
Foundation Holdler ‘68Main reason
Page 135 and 136:
dialogue.Possible follow-up Project
Page 137 and 138:
WORKING GROUP ON TRANSLATION AND TE
Page 139:
Sutton, Geoffrey, 2008. Concise Enc
show all

FULL VERSION - European Commission - Europa

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?