FULL VERSION - European Commission - Europa

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ConclusionsBi- and multilingualism is already an every-day reality for many Europeans: immigrants,members of linguistic minorities, citizen in cross-border regions, among others.At the same time, multilingualism is seen by the majority of monolingual Europeans as adesirable but near-impossible goal.This clearly demonstrates that the difference between monolingualism and multilingualism iscertainly not one of ability, but rather one of motivation, needs, and exposure to otherlanguages.Many actions and activities have been recommended in this paper. Indeed for multilingualismto become a reality in Europe, exposure to multiple languages should become “the norm” inmany aspects of everyday life. Education, social inclusion, translation and terminology havebeen specifically addressed, as has the development of an overall strategic framework thatcoherently addresses lesser-used and minority languages.Overarching all this is the necessity to identify the needs and goals of Europeans withrespect to language-learning, and to develop policies, actions and programmes which willenable Europeans to acquire and maintain new languages, or to receive language servicessuch as translation and interpretation, as a function of their needs and social context.We believe different policies and tools will be necessary to address different requirementsand contexts; further and systematic research should be conducted, and expertisedeveloped, in the language policies and tools that would best match differentrequirements or social contexts.Finally most work groups have recognised the need for a Language Observatory whichwould fulfil three functions. Centralisation, systematic evaluation and promotion of multilingual tools and bestpractices Empirical evaluation and monitoring of multilingualism in the European Union Communication to policy-makers, civil society and citizen on multilingualism.Such an Observatory would provide vital, empirical expertise to policy-makers, would be in aposition to evaluate the impact of language policies, and would also be a central resource onmultilingual policy, tools and best practice for all actors concerned with multilingualism – fromindividual citizen to policy-makers and institutions.Civil Society Platform on Multilingualism: 64Policy Recommendations for the Promotion of Multilingualism in the European Union 06/06/10 – FULL VERSION
Civil Society Platform onMultilingualismPolicy Recommendations for the Promotion ofMultilingualism in the European UnionAPPENDICES 1‐209 June 2011
Page 1 and 2:
Civil Society Platform on Multiling
Page 3:
1.3 Post-Lisbon scenario: a "new ri
Page 8 and 9:
languages, and on best practices in
Page 10 and 11:
On Translation and Terminology*Full
Page 12 and 13:
Recommendations1 EU language plan t
Page 14 and 15: Introduction“(The Union) …shall
Page 16 and 17: flower. The popularity of a garden
Page 18 and 19: Concern that multilingualism was be
Page 20 and 21: 1.6 Sub-group feedbackThe responses
Page 22 and 23: discrimination in favour of RMLs. S
Page 24 and 25: 3.3 Sub-group feedbackGroup members
Page 26 and 27: Slovenian or the RMLs. In this resp
Page 28 and 29: 5.3 Linguistic ObservatorySeveral o
Page 30 and 31: Work group on Language Diversity an
Page 32 and 33: understand people from other cultur
Page 34: target groups are not exclusive amo
Page 39 and 40: 1 Defining the task of the Work Gro
Page 41 and 42: 2.2 Work methodologyWG1 was initial
Page 43 and 44: articles. 69 The only other languag
Page 45 and 46: education in European schools is ca
Page 47 and 48: The question of what role language
Page 49 and 50: trainees; Offer training mechanisms
Page 51 and 52: investigating expectations and asse
Page 53 and 54: learning. The key of course is the
Page 55 and 56: As a pedagogy this education promot
Page 57 and 58: mechanism to disseminate best pract
Page 59 and 60: 3 Education and training Mobility g
Page 61 and 62: In order to facilitate the circulat
Page 63: target groups (content creator or c
Page 67 and 68: WORKING GROUP ON LANGUAGE PLANNING
Page 69 and 70: (6.2) Linguistic rights for all EU
Page 71 and 72: cost-benefit analysis comparing Eng
Page 73 and 74: (a) Constantly insisting that its i
Page 75 and 76: Hicks, Davyth 2005 Cornish: languag
Page 77 and 78: WORKING GROUP ON LANGUAGE DIVERSITY
Page 79 and 80: 4.1 In which way do you think this
Page 81 and 82: 8 What should the European Union do
Page 83 and 84: 10 What are the most common barrier
Page 85 and 86: Additional questions concerning lan
Page 87 and 88: References 8EU official documentsEu
Page 89 and 90: WORKING GROUP ON EDUCATIONANNEX 6.1
Page 91 and 92: 27. In which way are there constrai
Page 93 and 94: 8. On what topics is your instituti
Page 95 and 96: Annex 6.4 GROUP MEMBERS′ POSITION
Page 97 and 98: water, and one begins skiing on the
Page 99 and 100: Cor van der Meer - Mercator Europea
Page 101 and 102: supported study completed in 2006 (
Page 103 and 104: Finally, one of the greatest challe
Page 105 and 106: Marta Lottes - European Association
Page 107 and 108: o More flexible provision of langua
Page 109 and 110: ) An international THEATRE YOUTH FO
Page 111 and 112: Pasporta Servo http://www.pasportas
Page 113 and 114: interpretation and reporting system
Page 115 and 116:
proficiency in a particular languag
Page 117 and 118:
of mediating competence. This will
Page 119 and 120:
Annex 6.5 BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLESBES
Page 121 and 122:
extended and systematic research on
Page 123 and 124:
BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 2: Laying see
Page 125 and 126:
- Bonjour, monsieur l’facteur, av
Page 127 and 128:
BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 3: Non formal
Page 129 and 130:
BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLE 4: Multiplica
Page 131 and 132:
Possible follow-up Project:The even
Page 133 and 134:
Foundation Holdler ‘68Main reason
Page 135 and 136:
dialogue.Possible follow-up Project
Page 137 and 138:
WORKING GROUP ON TRANSLATION AND TE
Page 139:
Sutton, Geoffrey, 2008. Concise Enc
show all

FULL VERSION - European Commission - Europa

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?