13.07.2015 Views

Jamaica Biofuels Report - Ministry of Energy

Jamaica Biofuels Report - Ministry of Energy

Jamaica Biofuels Report - Ministry of Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

farmers and Midwestern states, whereas the opposition is led by environmental groups andothers who see the program as uneconomical for one reason or another.The practical significance for <strong>Jamaica</strong> is that as a member <strong>of</strong> the Caribbean Basin Initiative, thecountry can take advantage <strong>of</strong> the credit without <strong>of</strong>fsetting tariffs, but the future <strong>of</strong> the credit ishighly uncertain and probably would entail significant risk for an investor who relied on it. Onthe other hand, a renewable fuel standard established by the <strong>Energy</strong> Independence andSecurity Act <strong>of</strong> 2007 requires 12.95 billion gallons from renewable sources in 2010, increasingto 36 billion gallons per year by 2022. Greenhouse gas and other environmental criteria mayfavor cane-derived ethanol over other sources.European UnionIn the EU both ethanol and biodiesel receive government financial support in almost allmember states predominantly in the form <strong>of</strong> reduced fuel excise taxes for bi<strong>of</strong>uels. A recentstudy 10 concludes that EU governments spent $4.8 billion in 2006 to support bi<strong>of</strong>uels in aneffort to reduce reliance on oil. By 2008 the financial support dropped to $3.9 billion on 1.68billion gallons <strong>of</strong> produced ethanol and 2.33 billion gallons <strong>of</strong> produced biodiesel because excisetaxes on bi<strong>of</strong>uels were raised as mandatory bi<strong>of</strong>uels blending policy gained popularity. Thisgovernment support translates to $3.64/gal for ethanol and $2.46/gal for biodiesel (calculatedat an exchange rate <strong>of</strong> $1.30 per euro).Interestingly, the same study makes the following recommendations to European policymakers:Institute a “polluter pays” principle, a form <strong>of</strong> carbon tax, to account for the consequences <strong>of</strong>fossil fuel use;Phase out bi<strong>of</strong>uels support except for research and development (R&D) programs;Eliminate tariffs on imported fuel ethanol;Implement transparency concerning EU member states' bi<strong>of</strong>uels policies to allow properevaluation <strong>of</strong> their support measures.AustraliaIn 2001 Australia set a production target (but not a mandate) <strong>of</strong> 350M liters per year (92 mgy)<strong>of</strong> bi<strong>of</strong>uels by 2010. The country has so far assisted bi<strong>of</strong>uels prices mainly through an excise taxrebate <strong>of</strong> $1.34/gal to producers (calculated at an exchange rate <strong>of</strong> A$1.07 per US$). Thesubsidy is provided to domestically produced ethanol and biodiesel, as well as – surprisingly –to imported biodiesel, but not to imported ethanol. As a result, bi<strong>of</strong>uels will enjoy an excisetax-free status until June 30, 2011. Subsequently, the taxes will progressively rise to 50% <strong>of</strong> thelevel <strong>of</strong> those imposed on gasoline and diesel by 2015-16 on an energy equivalent basis.10 Jung, A. et al., “<strong>Bi<strong>of</strong>uels</strong> – At What Cost? Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in the European Union –2010 Update”, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Geneva, Switzerland, July 2010.31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!