Proceedings Fonetik 2009 - Institutionen för lingvistik

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Proceedings, FONETIK 2009, Dept. of Linguistics, Stockholm Universitydropped to a little below 80%, but the unaccentedstimuli remained as high as almost 100%.SJ’s responses to unaccented/accented stimuli at0.55 appeared closely to each other. Besides, thes-curves of SJ looked somewhat more gradualthan those of NJ.Figure 1. The percentage of “short” responses forstimuli with the shortest to the longest V2 (from leftto right on x-axis).Table 3 shows the mean category boundaryand the steepness of the categorization function.Two-way ANOVAs were conducted for thefactors Group (SJ, NJ) and Accent Type (Unaccented,Accented) separately for the categoryboundary and the steepness.Table 3. The category boundary location (ms) andthe steepness of the categorization function in theunaccented (flat) and the accented stimuli ofma-series.Unaccented(flat)AccentedSJ NJ SJ NJBoundary (ms) 199.6 200.0 191.3 182.6SD 13.6 15.1 13.4 13.2Steepness 27.8 16.3 27.6 18.8SD 7.7 8.9 9.7 10.5For the categorical boundary, the interactionbetween Group and Accent Type tended to besignificant (F(1,33)=3.31, p
Proceedings, FONETIK 2009, Dept. of Linguistics, Stockholm UniversityThe result for steepness was similar to that ofma-series. There was no significant interactionbetween the factors Group and Accent Type(F(1,34)=0.00, n.s.), but there was a significantmain effect of Group (F(1,34)=11.47, p
Page 1 and 2:
Department of LinguisticsProceeding
Page 3 and 4:
Proceedings, FONETIK 2009, Dept. of
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Proceedings, FOETIK 2009, Dept. of
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64: Proceedings, FONETIK 2009, Dept. of
Page 113: Proceedings, FONETIK 2009, Dept. of
Page 127 and 128: Proceedings, FOETIK 2009, Dept. of
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227:
Department of LinguisticsPhonetics
show all

Proceedings Fonetik 2009 - Institutionen för lingvistik

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?