13.07.2015 Views

шш in review DISCOURSE OF THE OTHER - University of British ...

шш in review DISCOURSE OF THE OTHER - University of British ...

шш in review DISCOURSE OF THE OTHER - University of British ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOOKS IN REVIEWdescription and deflate passion, exclamationmarks replace emotion, and Souster'scareless use <strong>of</strong> specific terms wouldweaken even newspaper prose. His lack<strong>of</strong> thought shows up embarrass<strong>in</strong>gly <strong>in</strong>"Full Moon," <strong>in</strong> which his subject is anAlex Colville serigraph the actual title<strong>of</strong> which is "New Moon" (Souster alsodescribes the "Full Moon" as "scythelike")and <strong>in</strong> "The Reg<strong>in</strong>a Manifesto:A Found Poem," where Souster takescredit for the poetic qualities <strong>of</strong> a documentthat is a stylistic descendant <strong>of</strong>evangelical preach<strong>in</strong>g and the K<strong>in</strong>gJames Bible.Souster would "give my eye-teeth rightnow / just to have written any stanza /<strong>of</strong> Tantramar Revisited." His envy <strong>of</strong> SirCharles G. D. Roberts contrasts withDouglas Lochhead's sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement<strong>in</strong> literary cont<strong>in</strong>uity. In a poemfrom High Marsh Road (1980) republished<strong>in</strong> Tiger <strong>in</strong> the Skull, Lochheadshows his connection with tradition:the total glimpse <strong>of</strong> it [truth] as Robertstook to Tantramar.us<strong>in</strong>g his telescopehis eye revisited.now I search thesame dikes for details <strong>of</strong> shore-birds,the weirs hold straggler ducks.it isgood to have such footstepsCharles G.D.Roberts, p<strong>in</strong>ce-nez and tails, flieslike an angel by Stanley Spencer overthis placeThe poems <strong>in</strong> Tiger <strong>in</strong> the Skull arecarefully crafted, the centrifugal force <strong>of</strong>thought and emotion almost, but neverquite, escap<strong>in</strong>g the centripetal control <strong>of</strong>form and technique. Like Roberts, Lochheadhas the rare ability to write simplyabout ord<strong>in</strong>ary th<strong>in</strong>gs and yet provokethe reader to new <strong>in</strong>sights and emotions.Perhaps the most amaz<strong>in</strong>g feat <strong>of</strong> thissort is "The s<strong>of</strong>t doves appear," <strong>in</strong> whichimage-mak<strong>in</strong>g and description gentlyforce reconsideration <strong>of</strong>, yes, pigeons.Lochhead's poems about romantic or sexuallove are, thanks to his technical control,tense with emotion.The Creat<strong>in</strong>g Word consists <strong>of</strong> eleven<strong>in</strong>tellectually uneven and tenuously relatedconference papers. "The Teach<strong>in</strong>g<strong>of</strong> Poetry," by Rob<strong>in</strong> Skelton, and "CreativeWrit<strong>in</strong>g: Can It Be Taught?" byRudy Wiebe, seem unpremeditated andsolipsistic. John Dixon and Martha K<strong>in</strong>gwrite about teach<strong>in</strong>g "language arts" toyoungsters to enhance psychological development.Kenneth Smillie puts <strong>in</strong>toperspective the craze for computerassistedlearn<strong>in</strong>g and "computer literacy"<strong>in</strong> elementary and high schools. RowlandMcMaster and Norman Page both writebrilliantly, McMaster about Great Expectationsand Page about The Mill onthe Floss, but their essays are almost unrelatedto the stated topic, as is SusanJackel's "Canadian Literature <strong>in</strong> theSecondary Curriculum," a well-documentedand <strong>in</strong>sightful history and description<strong>of</strong>, and prescription for, theteach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Canadian literature <strong>in</strong> Albertaschools.The first three essays <strong>in</strong> The Creat<strong>in</strong>gWord are thoroughly researched andcarefully considered responses to thetopic by scholars <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational stand<strong>in</strong>g.In "Constru<strong>in</strong>g and Deconstruct<strong>in</strong>g,"M. H. Abrams relates the philosophy<strong>of</strong> Jacques Derrida to the radicalskepticism <strong>of</strong> David Hume and rehearsesJ. Hillis Miller's read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Wordsworth's"A Slumber Did My Spirit Seal"to describe and demonstrate deconstructionism.Then, <strong>in</strong> outl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g his reservationsabout practis<strong>in</strong>g and teach<strong>in</strong>g deconstructivecriticism, Abrams expla<strong>in</strong>seven more clearly the nature and uses <strong>of</strong>this discipl<strong>in</strong>e. Louise M. Rosenblatt callsdeconstructionists "basically anti-humanist"<strong>in</strong> "The Literary Transaction." Bydisregard<strong>in</strong>g the emotional impact andhuman <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>of</strong> literature, she argues,they disregard the reader. In Rosenblatt'sview, a work <strong>of</strong> literature is "evoked" by210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!