13.07.2015 Views

шш in review DISCOURSE OF THE OTHER - University of British ...

шш in review DISCOURSE OF THE OTHER - University of British ...

шш in review DISCOURSE OF THE OTHER - University of British ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BOOKS IN REVIEWthe story are gracefully woven by VeronicaTennant to suggest resonances towhich all young readers might relate.CONFEDERATIONPOETSJAMES GELLERTDUNCAN CAMPBELL SCOTT, Powassan's Drum:Poems <strong>of</strong> Duncan Campbell Scott, eds. RaymondSouster & Douglas Lochhead. Tecumseh,$7.95.BLISS CARMAN, W<strong>in</strong>dflower: Poems <strong>of</strong> BlissCarman, eds. Raymond Souster & DouglasLochhead. Tecumseh, $9.95.MURIEL MILLER, Bliss Carman: Quest & Revolt.Jesperson Press, $36.00.THAT TECUMSEH PRESS has decided topublish read<strong>in</strong>g editions <strong>of</strong> the selectedpoems <strong>of</strong> Duncan Campbell Scott andBliss Carman is commendable. As members<strong>of</strong> the so-called Confederation group<strong>of</strong> poets, both Scott and Carman areimportant figures <strong>in</strong> the development <strong>of</strong>Canadian poetry. Until now, however, ithas proved difficult to locate substantialselections <strong>of</strong> their work <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>t. For BlissCarman one had to go back to LomePierce's anthology <strong>of</strong> 1954 or the RobertSorfleet edition <strong>of</strong> 1976. For Scott it wasa matter <strong>of</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g E. K. Brown's SelectedPoems <strong>of</strong> 1951 or Tecumseh's earlierSelected Poetry <strong>of</strong> 1974, edited by GlennClever. This paucity <strong>of</strong> texts has meantthat all too <strong>of</strong>ten readers know Scott andCarman only through a few well-knownanthology pieces.While Powassan's Drum and W<strong>in</strong>dflower<strong>of</strong>fer readers a generous selection<strong>of</strong> the poetry <strong>of</strong> Scott and Carman, thevolumes prove far from ideal. They havebeen cheaply produced: the font for theScott edition is too small for easy read<strong>in</strong>g,and the Carman volume is <strong>in</strong>ked sodarkly that each l<strong>in</strong>e appears emphasized.Indeed, it looks as though TecumsehPress <strong>in</strong>tended the volumes as <strong>in</strong>terimeditions for the new reader. They werecerta<strong>in</strong>ly not produced with the seriousstudent <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, s<strong>in</strong>ce they conta<strong>in</strong> neithernotes nor bibliography. In Tecumseh'searlier edition <strong>of</strong> Scott's poetry, theeditor at least gave some <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong>the chronological progression and supplieda brief biographical note. This timethe editors have chosen to present thepoems <strong>in</strong> vague thematic group<strong>in</strong>gs,which suggest a f<strong>in</strong> de siècle preciosity.Moreover, the double <strong>in</strong>troductions byRaymond Souster and Douglas Lochheadare largely uncritical. Both Souster andLochhead mention that they read Scottand Carman when they were young, andthey claim to have been <strong>in</strong>fluenced bythem, but they <strong>of</strong>fer little evidence <strong>of</strong>how and why the poets rema<strong>in</strong> importanttoday. Tecumseh's decision to publisheditions with no historical backgroundmay well prompt readers to ask whatCarman and Scott mean to them as poetsonce the protective lens <strong>of</strong> "historicalimportance" has been removed.By far the more <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g volume isthe Scott selection, Powassan's Drum.The editors chose to beg<strong>in</strong> with sevenIndian and Metis poems which capturethe plight <strong>of</strong> these peoples poised betweendifferent cultures and time periods.These poems are undoubtedly amongScott's most orig<strong>in</strong>al. Yet when seen <strong>in</strong>the midst <strong>of</strong> the current debate aboutnative and ethnic rights and cultures,they appear somewhat dated. While Scottsympathizes with the <strong>in</strong>dividual caughtbetween cultures, he also believes <strong>in</strong> ak<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> Coleridgean moral evolution.From this evolutionary perspective, thenative people are seen as essentially"savage," redeemed only when they moveupwards to a "higher" state <strong>of</strong> spiritualunderstand<strong>in</strong>g. Consequently, Scott tendsto underm<strong>in</strong>e the essential dignity <strong>of</strong> the<strong>in</strong>dividual by dissolv<strong>in</strong>g it <strong>in</strong> a higherspiritualism, a problem for all those im-223

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!