Jens Janssen Diploma Thesis - Prof. Dr. Norbert Wermes ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[13] Peric, I. et al.: The FEI3 readout chip for the ATLAS pixel detector. NuclearInstruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators,Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 565(1):178–187,2006, ISSN 0168-9002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TJM-4K3CY3J-5/2/bc39d9782e35df5fb1076dc06584c623,Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semiconductor PixelDetectors for Particles and Imaging - PIXEL 2005.[14] Arutinov, D. et al.: Digital architecture and interface of the new ATLASPixel Front-End IC for upgraded LHC luminosity. InNuclear Science SymposiumConference Record, 2008. NSS ’08. IEEE, pp. 1923–1928, Oct. 2008.DOI 10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774765.[15] Karagounis, M. et al.: Development of the ATLAS FE-I4 pixel readoutIC for b-layer Upgrade and Super-LHC. 2008. http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/1158505, visited on 15 Dec. 2010.[16] Mathes, M. et al.: Characterization of a single crystal diamond pixeldetector in a high energy particle beam. Journal of Instrumentation,3(12):P12002, 2008. http://stacks.iop.org/1748-0221/3/i=12/a=P12002.[17] Nakamura, K. et al.: Review of Particle Physics, 2010–2011. Review ofParticle Properties. J. Phys. G, 37(7A):075021, 2010. http://pdg.lbl.gov.[18] Mathes, M.: Development and Characterization of Diamond and 3D-SiliconPixel Detectors with ATLAS-Pixel Readout Electronics. PhD Thesis, Universityof Bonn, Bonn, Dec. 2008.[19] Groom, D.E., Mokhov, N.V., and Striganov, S.I.: Muon Stopping Powerand Range Tables 10MeV–100TeV. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables,78(2):183–356, 2001, ISSN 0092-640X. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X01908617.[20] Landau, L.D.: On the energy loss of particles by ionization. J. Exp.Phys.(USSR), 8:201–205, 1944.[21] Bichsel, H.: Straggling in thin silicon detectors. Rev. Mod. Phys., 60(3):663–699, Jul 1988. DOI 10.1103/RevModPhys.60.663.[22] Lutz, G. (ed.): Semiconductors Radiation Detectors. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg,2007, ISBN 978-3-540-71678-5.[23] Ramo, S.: Currents Induced by Electron Motion. Proceedings of the IRE,27(9):584–585, 1939, ISSN 0096-8390. DOI 10.1109/JRPROC.1939.228757.[24] Jun, I. et al.: Proton nonionizing energy loss (NIEL) for device applications.IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 50(6):1924–1928, Dec. 2003,ISSN 0018-9499. DOI 10.1109/TNS.2003.820760.[25] Wunstorf, R.: Systematische Untersuchungen zur Strahlenresistenzvon Silizium-Detektoren für die Verwendung in Hochenergiephysik-Experimenten. PhD thesis, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, 1992. http://books.google.de/books?id=XmTlSgAACAAJ.90
[26] Lindström, G. et al.: Radiation hard silicon detectors–developmentsby the RD48 (ROSE) collaboration. Nuclear Instruments andMethods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers,Detectors and Associated Equipment, 466(2):308–326, 2001,ISSN 0168-9002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TJM-43CK059-F/2/0380b762a87258cfe9e69c45098e53ca, DOI10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00560-5.[27] Capeans, M. et al.: Atlas insertable b-layer technical design report. Tech.Rep. CERN-LHCC-2010-013. ATLAS-TDR-019, CERN, Geneva, Sept.2010.[28] Da Via, C. et al.: Advances in silicon detectors for particle trackingin extreme radiation environments. Nuclear Instruments andMethods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers,Detectors and Associated Equipment, 509(1–3):86–91, 2003,ISSN 0168-9002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TJM-48R1NFT-9/2/e861edbfa4bcd1cee9a87375cc819433, DOI10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01554-7".[29] Hügging, F.G.: Der ATLAS Pixelsensor: Der state-of-the-art Pixelsensorfür teilchenphysikalische Anwendungen mit extrem hohen Strahlungsfeldern.PhD Thesis, University of Dortmund, Dortmund, June 2001.[30] Benoit, M., Lounis, A., and Dinu, N.: Simulation of Radiation DamageE ects on Planar Pixel Guard Ring Structure for ATLAS Inner DetectorUpgrade. Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on, 56(6):3236–3243, Dec.2009, ISSN 0018-9499. DOI 10.1109/TNS.2009.2034002.[31] Beimforde, M.: The ATLAS Planar Pixel Sensor R&D project. NuclearInstruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A:Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment,2010, ISSN 0168-9002. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TJM-4YYGGSV-7/2/69a1b88494d7445642f1e59a59590708,DOI 10.1016/j.nima.2010.04.078.[32] Weigell, P. et al.: Characterization and Performance of Silicon n-in-p PixelDetectors for the ATLAS Upgrades. Arxiv preprint arXiv:1012.3595, 2010.[33] Krüger, H.: Test Systems for ATLAS Pixel Detector Upgrade Activities,Jan. 2008. http://icwiki.physik.uni-bonn.de/twiki/pub/Systems/WebHome/ATLAS_Pixel_Chip_Test_Systems.pdf, visited on 30 Dec. 2010.[34] Backhaus, M.: Development of an USB-based test system for the FE-I3readout chips of the ATLAS pixel detector and Noise Occupancy Studies.Diploma Thesis, University of Bonn, Bonn, Dec. 2009.[35] Schneider, J. and Krüger, H.: S3 Multi IO System, Jan. 2010. http://icwiki.physik.uni-bonn.de/svn/USBpixI4/doc/MultiIOboard_V1.03_Manual.pdf, visited on 18 Nov. 2010.[36] Köhler, F.: Threshold di erence USBpix – TurboDAQ, Jan. 2010. http://indico.cern.ch/event/80615, visited on 14 Oct. 2010.91
Page 1:
Universität BonnPhysikalisches Ins
Page 7 and 8:
Chapter 1IntroductionThe ATLAS expe
Page 9 and 10:
Chapter 2The LHC Experiment2.1 The
Page 11 and 12:
Figure 2.3: Cut-away view of the in
Page 13 and 14:
The electromagnetic calorimeter use
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 3Silicon Pixel Detectors3.1
Page 17 and 18:
Figure 3.2: Layout and interconnect
Page 19 and 20:
(a) (b)Figure 3.4: On top view of t
Page 21:
Figure 3.5: The analog pixel block
Page 24 and 25:
Figure 3.8: The digital block of th
Page 26 and 27:
the digital readout of the chip can
Page 28 and 29:
Stopping power [MeV cm 2 /g]100101L
Page 30 and 31:
The free charge carriers need to be
Page 32 and 33:
The first point particularly concer
Page 34 and 35:
Figure 3.14: A 3D n-in-p sensor (le
Page 36 and 37:
few µm compared to a few 100 µm).
Page 38 and 39:
Figure 4.1: The USBpix test system
Page 40 and 41:
e accessed through a 20-bit wide ad
Page 42 and 43:
hardware, USBpixdll library uses fu
Page 44 and 45: 100Scan overlaythreshold80604020MSC
Page 46 and 47: mand clock (CCK, 4 MHz 17 ) by mult
Page 48 and 49: aw data word bit [31:0]hit wordw/o
Page 50 and 51: Figure 4.7: Overview of interconnec
Page 52 and 53: SOURCE_SCAN.Module "test"Cluster To
Page 54 and 55: Figure 5.1: The USBpix test setup:
Page 56 and 57: Not only the wafer processing a ect
Page 58 and 59: 2. The tuning was changed to a gain
Page 60 and 61: FDAC The FDAC is a 3-bit pixel regi
Page 62 and 63: probability of 50%. Mathematically,
Page 64 and 65: that the particles first impinge th
Page 66 and 67: 2. Conversion of (clustered) Time-o
Page 68 and 69: from the expected charge of 10000 e
Page 70 and 71: 6.2 Unirradiated Planar SensorsThe
Page 72 and 73: Sensor 3631-303 “ATLAS W11 19GR-2
Page 74 and 75: (a)(b)(c)Figure 6.4: Planar devices
Page 76 and 77: 6.3.1 Results of the Bias ScanLeaka
Page 78 and 79: (a)(b)Figure 6.7: Leakage current o
Page 80 and 81: (a)(b)Figure 6.9: FBK 3D devices: m
Page 82 and 83: Appendix AFE-I3 StandardConfigurati
Page 84 and 85: Appendix BFPGA ConfigurationRegiste
Page 86 and 87: Appendix CTuning ResultsThis page i
Page 88 and 89: Figure C.1: Tuning of the 3631-303
Page 90 and 91: 8642Figure C.3: Tuning of the WR13
Page 92 and 93: 8642Figure C.5: Tuning of the 4EM9
Page 96 and 97: [37] Backhaus, M. et al.: Developme
show all

Jens Janssen Diploma Thesis - Prof. Dr. Norbert Wermes ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?