08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Economic Report of the President - 2005 - The American Presidency ...

Economic Report of the President - 2005 - The American Presidency ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

monopoly rationale for <strong>the</strong> economic regulation <strong>of</strong> telephone service isbeginning to fall away. Squelching competition as a threat to <strong>the</strong> existingregulatory framework would turn matters on <strong>the</strong>ir head. Regulation shouldadapt to changing market realities in ways that allow innovation to flourishand consumers to choose among alternatives, while ensuring nationalsecurity, homeland security, law enforcement and public safety.Realizing <strong>the</strong> Promise <strong>of</strong> BroadbandBroadband services <strong>of</strong>fer download speeds much faster than dial-upInternet access, enabling innovative features such as streaming video andVoIP. For example, fiber-optic cable to <strong>the</strong> home can provide speeds <strong>of</strong> morethan 100 megabits per second. Broadband services have quickly beenembraced by <strong>the</strong> public, growing from 2.8 million high-speed lines (defined asconnection speeds over 200 kilobits per second in at least one direction) inDecember 1999 to more than 32.4 million lines in June 2004. This representsan annual growth rate <strong>of</strong> 72 percent. In <strong>the</strong> first few years after inception,broadband penetration among U.S. households has outpaced <strong>the</strong> earlierdiffusion <strong>of</strong> dial-up Internet, mobile wireless telephones, personal computers,videocassette recorders, and color television.Universal, Affordable Access to BroadbandLast March, <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong> announced a national goal <strong>of</strong> universal,affordable access to broadband services by 2007. The Administration’songoing efforts to achieve this goal reflect a belief in <strong>the</strong> powers <strong>of</strong> competitionand private sector innovation to bring <strong>the</strong> benefits <strong>of</strong> broadband toconsumers. As experience in <strong>the</strong> telephone industry has shown, competition<strong>of</strong>fers <strong>the</strong> most robust and reliable means <strong>of</strong> broadly diffusing important technologies.The Administration has taken steps to unleash <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> freemarkets to deliver broadband services by removing disincentives to invest,streng<strong>the</strong>ning property rights, and allowing consumers ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong>government to choose <strong>the</strong> technologies that best meet <strong>the</strong>ir needs.Removing Disincentives to InvestCompetition in broadband service is growing. Already, many communitieshave two providers <strong>of</strong> broadband service. In 1999, 33.7 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> zipcodes in <strong>the</strong> United States had at least two high-speed Internet accessproviders. By <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong> 2004, <strong>the</strong> fraction had risen to 80.5 percent. S<strong>of</strong>ar, competition in broadband has primarily been between DSL servicesprovided by telephone companies and cable modem services provided bycable television system operators. Cable’s share in high-speed lines has grown150 | <strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>President</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!