08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Economic Report of the President - 2005 - The American Presidency ...

Economic Report of the President - 2005 - The American Presidency ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

owner claimed it was for business, he or she could deduct <strong>the</strong> entire cost <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> computer.There are many variants <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basic flat tax idea. For example, someproposals would allow for greater progressivity by using multiple tax rates in<strong>the</strong> individual tax. O<strong>the</strong>r proposals would retain some deductions, such asthose for charitable contributions or mortgage interest. Each variationsacrifices some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> efficiency gains and basic simplicity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flat tax toachieve o<strong>the</strong>r goals.Consumed Income TaxUnder a consumed income tax, taxpayers first compute income as <strong>the</strong>y dounder <strong>the</strong> income tax. Then taxpayers are allowed an unlimited deduction fornet saving during <strong>the</strong> year. A consumed income tax is comparable to a traditionalIRA for which contributions are deductible and withdrawals are subjectto tax, but would have no limits on contributions or penalties on withdrawals.To prevent taxpayers from simply borrowing money and claiming a deductionfor putting <strong>the</strong> proceeds into a savings account, any borrowing would beadded to income and thus be taxable.The consumed income tax <strong>of</strong>fers more flexibility than <strong>the</strong> flat tax inallocating <strong>the</strong> burden among income classes because <strong>the</strong> individual tax base isbroader and most proposals include a progressive rate structure. The primarydisadvantage is complexity. It retains <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> current systembecause taxpayers start by computing income as <strong>the</strong>y would under currentlaw. Then a second procedure to compute saving net <strong>of</strong> borrowing adds anadditional layer <strong>of</strong> complexity.Reform Within <strong>the</strong> Current SystemA change to any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> consumption tax proposals would scrap <strong>the</strong> currenttax system and replace much or all <strong>of</strong> it with a new one. Businesses and individualswould have to learn how to comply with and best arrange <strong>the</strong>ir affairsunder <strong>the</strong> new system. A new administrative apparatus would be required forsome proposals. While sales taxes have long been used in this country andVATs in many o<strong>the</strong>r countries, <strong>the</strong>se are imposed at lower rates than would berequired to replace all Federal revenues and are used along with, ra<strong>the</strong>r thanas replacements for, income taxes.Given <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> transition to an entirely new tax system, some proposalsfocus on reform within <strong>the</strong> current structure. Starting from <strong>the</strong> current systemwould reduce transition and adjustment costs and considerable benefits couldbe obtained by simplifying and rationalizing tax provisions that overlap or areo<strong>the</strong>rwise overly complex. Advantages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prototypes and <strong>the</strong> tax principlesdiscussed above could guide <strong>the</strong> direction <strong>of</strong> reform.Chapter 3 | 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!