08.08.2015 Views

Economic Report of the President

Economic Report of the President - 2005 - The American Presidency ...

Economic Report of the President - 2005 - The American Presidency ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The current set <strong>of</strong> saving incentives could be combined into a simplersystem with one type <strong>of</strong> account for individual retirement saving, one foremployer-sponsored retirement saving, and one for lifetime saving foranticipated future education, health, home purchases, or o<strong>the</strong>r expenses. The<strong>President</strong>’s budgets have included proposals for Retirement Savings Accounts(RSAs), Employer Retirement Savings Accounts (ERSAs), and LifetimeSavings Accounts (LSAs). Under <strong>the</strong>se proposals and after a transition period,<strong>the</strong> savings incentives <strong>of</strong> over 90 percent <strong>of</strong> households would no longer beadversely affected by <strong>the</strong> tax system.Double Taxation <strong>of</strong> Corporate IncomeCorporate income is taxed first at <strong>the</strong> corporate level and <strong>the</strong>n a secondtime under <strong>the</strong> individual income tax as dividends or capital gains. The taxrelief enacted in 2003 reduced <strong>the</strong> double tax by lowering individual incometax rates for both dividends and capital gains. The current provisions expireafter 2008, however. Thus, tax reform could include a permanent extension<strong>of</strong> current provisions or go fur<strong>the</strong>r and completely eliminate double taxation<strong>of</strong> corporate income.Depreciation RulesAs discussed above, <strong>the</strong> logic <strong>of</strong> an income tax requires that firms be able todeduct <strong>the</strong> amount by which <strong>the</strong>ir physical investments depreciate in valueeach year. Current law allows deductions for different types <strong>of</strong> equipment andbuildings over nine recovery periods from 3 to 39 years. A 2000 TreasuryDepartment report on depreciation concluded that <strong>the</strong> current system isbased on outdated recovery periods, does not account for new industries andtechnologies, and favors some assets while penalizing o<strong>the</strong>rs. As a result, <strong>the</strong>system distorts investment decisions and results in an inefficient allocation <strong>of</strong>capital in <strong>the</strong> economy.There are several approaches that reform could take. One option is to rationalize<strong>the</strong> current depreciation system to make it more neutral in its effects oninvestment decisions. An effort to bring depreciation rules closer to economicdepreciation would raise a number <strong>of</strong> difficult measurement issues, however.Ano<strong>the</strong>r approach would simplify <strong>the</strong> current system by reducing <strong>the</strong> number<strong>of</strong> recovery periods and grouping investments into broader categories.A third approach is to increase investment incentives and move part waytoward a consumption tax by increasing <strong>the</strong> generosity <strong>of</strong> depreciationallowances. For example, a temporary bonus depreciation provision in <strong>the</strong>2002 tax bill allowed taxpayers to deduct 30 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> an investmentin <strong>the</strong> first year with <strong>the</strong> remaining 70 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost to bededucted over <strong>the</strong> life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> investment. That is, 30 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cost wasdeducted immediately as under a consumption tax, while 70 percent wasChapter 3 | 89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!