21.08.2015 Views

Real freedom for all turtles in Sugarscape? - Presses universitaires ...

Real freedom for all turtles in Sugarscape? - Presses universitaires ...

Real freedom for all turtles in Sugarscape? - Presses universitaires ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192A r g u i n g a b o u t j u s t i c ecountries believe <strong>in</strong> democracy and trust the democratic political<strong>in</strong>stitutions. We are very <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> these topics because we believe – and<strong>in</strong> this we only follow the political and public debates – that someth<strong>in</strong>g iswrong (Norris 2011). We assume that there is someth<strong>in</strong>g around that can bec<strong>all</strong>ed a crisis of democracy. There are several reasons <strong>for</strong> that. Take <strong>for</strong><strong>in</strong>stance the turnout <strong>in</strong> elections. Elect<strong>in</strong>g a parliamentary assembly thatrepresents the will of the people is a central and crucial component of a wellfunction<strong>in</strong>gdemocracy. Yet when the citizens are <strong>in</strong>vited to contribute tothis very important act of elect<strong>in</strong>g a parliament, an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number ofthem simply rema<strong>in</strong> at home. Quite spectacular is the evolution of theturnout <strong>for</strong> the elections to the European Parliament. In 1979 it was alreadyquite low – by European standards – with 67% of the European citizensturn<strong>in</strong>g out to vote. Yet s<strong>in</strong>ce then the turnout kept go<strong>in</strong>g down at everyelection. In 1999 it went below 50% – a turnout of 49,9% – and <strong>in</strong> 2009 only43% of the Europeans turned out to vote.There are other <strong>in</strong>dicators that po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the same direction of citizensturn<strong>in</strong>g their back to the organizations and <strong>in</strong>stitutions of representativedemocracy. Political scientists keep track of the evolution of the membershipof political parties, and if you want to see graphs with l<strong>in</strong>es that go down ata very steep rate, this is the place to watch. Surveys ask<strong>in</strong>g about trust <strong>in</strong>political parties also reveal a sharp decrease to frighten<strong>in</strong>gly low figures.Another apparently disturb<strong>in</strong>g factor is the rise and success of politicalparties that mobilize voters with a discourse that is thoroughly antiestablishmentand especi<strong>all</strong>y accus<strong>in</strong>g the political and societal elite of be<strong>in</strong>ghopelessly disconnected from the real demands and concerns of the people.Representative democracy – so they claim – is a perversion because therepresentatives have lost touch with the people who they should trulyrepresent. They po<strong>in</strong>t especi<strong>all</strong>y at policies related to immigration andasylum seekers, and to the blatant refusal of the established elite tounderstand the damage that these policies have caused <strong>for</strong> the security andthe traditional culture, values, and religious beliefs of ord<strong>in</strong>ary citizens.And s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>all</strong> this is <strong>in</strong>deed framed as a crisis of democracy, politicalscientists are quite eager to understand what is go<strong>in</strong>g on. Are we <strong>in</strong>deedwitness<strong>in</strong>g a decrease <strong>in</strong> the belief and trust <strong>in</strong> democracy as it was built –with <strong>all</strong> its checks and balances – after the Second World War and after thedisastrous collapse of a number of democracies <strong>in</strong> 1920s and 1930s? Theeasiest way to check <strong>for</strong> that is simply to ask people. In most surveyquestionnaires drafted s<strong>in</strong>ce the 1990s we there<strong>for</strong>e <strong>in</strong>clude a few questionsabout trust <strong>in</strong> political <strong>in</strong>stitutions and quite often also a straight<strong>for</strong>wardquestion about ‘satisfaction with democracy’. Yet by ask<strong>in</strong>g these simple andstraight<strong>for</strong>ward questions we tend to <strong>for</strong>get that the very concept is debated,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!