21.08.2015 Views

Real freedom for all turtles in Sugarscape? - Presses universitaires ...

Real freedom for all turtles in Sugarscape? - Presses universitaires ...

Real freedom for all turtles in Sugarscape? - Presses universitaires ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42A r g u i n g a b o u t j u s t i c eonto the New York Times or The Guardian. But the Dutch-read<strong>in</strong>g public is fartoo sm<strong>all</strong> to support serious journalism on the <strong>in</strong>ternet. What happens toDutch or Flemish democracy when nobody is will<strong>in</strong>g to pay <strong>for</strong> oldfashionednewspapers?The blogosphere can’t be expected to take up the slack. First-classreport<strong>in</strong>g on national and <strong>in</strong>ternational affairs isn’t <strong>for</strong> amateurs. It requireslots of tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, lots of contacts and lots of expenses. It also requiresreporters with the well-honed capacity to write <strong>for</strong> a broad audience –someth<strong>in</strong>g that eludes the overwhelm<strong>in</strong>g majority of academic specialistsand th<strong>in</strong>k-tank policy wonks. And it requires editors who recognize theneed to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> their organization’s long-term credibility when present<strong>in</strong>gthe hot-button news of the day. The modern newspaper created the right<strong>in</strong>centives, but without a comparable bus<strong>in</strong>ess model <strong>for</strong> the newtechnology, blogg<strong>in</strong>g will degenerate <strong>in</strong>to a postmodern nightmare—withmillions spout<strong>in</strong>g off without any concern <strong>for</strong> the facts.Dead-endsThis po<strong>in</strong>t would be merely academic if we could trust <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>visiblehand to come up with a new way to provide economic support <strong>for</strong> seriousjournalism on a national and <strong>in</strong>ternational level. Indeed, the f<strong>in</strong>ancial presshas proved moderately successful <strong>in</strong> persuad<strong>in</strong>g readers to pay <strong>for</strong> onl<strong>in</strong>eaccess; and ma<strong>in</strong>stream media cont<strong>in</strong>ue to try to emulate this success, and Ihope they succeed. But if readers don’t succumb to the charms of PayPal—and quickly—the time <strong>for</strong> constructive action is upon us.Aside from the usual appeals <strong>for</strong> tax breaks and bailouts, the more<strong>in</strong>novative proposals come <strong>in</strong> two types. On the private side, there havebeen c<strong>all</strong>s <strong>for</strong> charities to endow newspapers or to subsidize politicalreport<strong>in</strong>g. On the public side, the BBC provides a work<strong>in</strong>g paradigm thatmight be extended to the written word.Both models have serious flaws. The problem with a BBC-style solution isclear enough. It is one th<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> government to serve as a major source ofnews; quite another to give it a virtual monopoly on report<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> sm<strong>all</strong>language zones. This could mean the death of critical fact-based <strong>in</strong>quirywhen a demagogic government takes power -- just at the moment we need itmost.There are serious problems with private endowments as well. For starters,there is the matter of scale. For example, Pro Publica, is an <strong>in</strong>novative privatefoundation <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigative report<strong>in</strong>g that is try<strong>in</strong>g to fill the journalism-gap<strong>in</strong> the United States. But it is currently fund<strong>in</strong>g thirty-two journalists—a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!