Phase 1 Bike Plan_r

Recommendations

Info

MULTI-USE SIDEPATH, ONE SIDE Descrip on: A shared-use sidepath, located on one side of the street (adjacent and parallel to a street), that accommodates two-way non-motorized traffic. Shared use paths are not dedicated bicycle facili es and thus also serve pedestrians, inline skaters, wheelchair users, joggers, and other non-motorized users. Features: Ÿ Most commonly used to provide a short connec on between two offset intersec ng streets or facili es that are part of the regional bicycle network or to provide direct connec on to a specific des na on, such as a school Ÿ Typically used in areas where right-of-way limita ons or other physical constraints prevent the installa on of bicycle infrastructure on both sides of the street Ÿ Preferred width for a shared-use sidepath accommoda ng two-way, non-motorized traffic is 12-14 feet; minimum width is 10 feet Ÿ Width of 8 feet may be acceptable to provide short linkages between other, more robust facili es or where rights-of-way are severely constrained MULTI-USE SIDEPATH. ORLANDO URBAN TRAIL. ORLANDO, FL SIDEPATH. CYCLE TRACK CONNECTION. WINDSOR, VANCOVER, BC Benefits: Ÿ Highly versa le facility Ÿ Physical Separa on Challenges: Ÿ Every street or driveway crossing presents a poten al conflict point that merit addi onal mi ga on; extreme care should be taken in the design of sidepaths along streets with many driveways and street crossings (especially high traffic volume loca ons); conflict mi ga on includes strict access management and specific design treatments to improve visibility, reduce speed, and separate movements at conflict points Ÿ Presence of users of a wide variety of non-motorized modes and abili es and two-way traffic may reduce predictability opera on and increase poten al for conflicts, necessita ng addi onal interven ons, such as path user speed limits Ÿ Provides reduced level of service for cyclists rela ve to dedicated bicycle facili es Design and Maintenance Guidance: Ÿ American Associa on of State Highway and Transporta on Officials (AASHTO). 2012. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facili es, 4th Edi on. Ÿ Na onal Associa on of City Transporta on Officials (NACTO). 2014. Urban <strong>Bike</strong>way Design Guide, 2nd Edi on. Rela ve Cost: Ÿ ~ $200,000 - $500,000 per mile, depending on width and material 52 INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS
OFF-ROAD MULTI-USE TRAIL Descrip on: A path, typically found along greenways, waterways, ac ve or abandoned railways, and u lity easements, within a right-of-way that is independent and physically separated from motor vehicle traffic by an open space or barrier. Mul -use paths are not dedicated bicycle facili es and thus also serve pedestrians, inline skaters, wheelchair users, joggers, and other non-motorized users. Features: Ÿ Provides a separated path for non-motorized users along a linear corridor that is independent of the roadway network Ÿ Preferred width for a mul -use path accommoda ng two-way, non-motorized traffic is 12-14 feet; minimum width is 10 feet Ÿ Width of 8 feet may be acceptable to provide short linkages between other, more robust facili es or where rights-of-way are severely constrained Benefits: Ÿ Highly versa le facility Ÿ Independence from roadway network creates high quality user experience Challenges: Ÿ Intersec ons of trails with roadways present poten al conflict points that may merit dedicated crossing treatments Ÿ Presence of users of a wide variety of non-motorized modes and abili es and two-way traffic may reduce predictability opera on and increase poten al for conflicts, necessita ng addi onal interven ons, such as path user speed limits Ÿ Right-of-way acquisi on may be costly and/or complicated Ÿ Topography and drainage can greatly impact design, construc on, and maintenance Ÿ Personal safety measures, such as emergency call boxes and ligh ng, must be considered due to distance from roadways Design and Maintenance Guidance: Ÿ American Associa on of State Highway and Transporta on Officials (AASHTO). 2012. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facili es, 4th Edi on. Rela ve Cost: Ÿ Typically $400,000 - $600,000 per mile, depending on width and material, not including ameni es such as trailheads or supplemental safety measures OFF-ROAD MULTI-USE PATH. LITTLE ECON GREEWAY, ORLANDO, FL OFF-ROAD MULTI-USE PATH. MEAD GARDEN TRAIL, ORLANDO, FL INFRASTRUCTURE ILLUSTRATIONS 53
Page 1:
STRATEGIC PLAN FOR ACTIVE MOBILITY
Page 4 and 5:
Bike racks at Bayfront Park, SEA Di
Page 6 and 7: PLAN INTENT AND OVERVIEW The MPO's
Page 8: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Decision makers in
Page 11 and 12: Network Development Community Hotsp
Page 13 and 14: On the basis of vehicular traffic v
Page 15 and 16: Every RTA transit bus provides bike
Page 17 and 18: A1 A2 K E Y MAP K2 B2 L1 L2 B1 C1 C
Page 19 and 20: A1 A2 INFRASTRUCTURE A2 Both Off Ro
Page 21 and 22: B1 B2 INFRASTRUCTURE B1 Both Off Ro
Page 23 and 24: B1 C2 INFRASTRUCTURE C2 C3 Low Cost
Page 25 and 26: C1 C2 D1 INFRASTRUCTURE D1 D2 Low C
Page 27 and 28: C2 C3 D3 INFRASTRUCTURE D2 D3 Low C
Page 29 and 30: D2 D3 E2 INFRASTRUCTURE E1 E2 Low C
Page 31 and 32: E1 E2 F2 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Ra
Page 33 and 34: F1 F2 G1 INFRASTRUCTURE G1 G2 Low C
Page 35 and 36: F2 F3 G3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Ra
Page 37 and 38: G1 G2 H1 INFRASTRUCTURE H1 H2 Low C
Page 39 and 40: G2 G3 G4 H3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost
Page 41 and 42: H1 H2 H3 1 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/
Page 43 and 44: H3 H4 3 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rap
Page 45 and 46: 2 3 J1 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapi
Page 47 and 48: J2 K1 INFRASTRUCTURE Low Cost/Rapid
Page 49 and 50: K2 L1 INFRASTRUCTURE L1 L2 Low Cost
Page 51 and 52: SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIALIZED TREATMENTS
Page 53 and 54: INFRASTRUCTURE ILLISTRATIONS 1. Bic
Page 55: BUFFERED BIKE LANE Descrip on: Buff
Page 59 and 60: ONE-WAY CYCLE TRACK, BOTH SIDES Des
Page 61 and 62: ONE-WAY CYCLE TRACK, BOTH SIDES 1
Page 63 and 64: SPECIALIZED TREATMENTS: HIGHWAY BIC
Page 65 and 66: SPECIALIZED TREATMENTS: RECAPTURE P
Page 67 and 68: SPECIALIZED TREATMENTS: BICYCLE ROU
Page 69 and 70: SPECIALIZED TREATMENTS: BICYCLE ROU
Page 71 and 72: IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX **Cost of Imp
Page 73 and 74: **Cost of Implementa on: Low - Pote
Page 75 and 76: **Cost of Implementa on: Low - Pote
Page 77 and 78: CASE STUDIES 1. Bikeshare 2. Accomm
Page 79 and 80: Accommoda ng Bikes on Transit Houst
Page 81 and 82: Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Rosa G
Page 83 and 84: Safe Routes To School Coali on/Task
Page 85 and 86: Safe Passage Enforcement Un l 2014,
Page 87 and 88: SPECIAL TOPICS NARRATIVE 1. Bike Sh
Page 89 and 90: Sta on Density and Level of Service
Page 91 and 92: 2 3 Walking School Buses and Bicycl
Page 93 and 94: Helmet Laws Most states require the
Page 95 and 96: 11 Performance Measures Periodic pr
Page 97 and 98: APPENDICES Appendix A: Stakeholder
Page 99 and 100: Appendix C: ANSWER IT! Online Surve
Page 101 and 102: Appendix C: ANSWER IT! Online Surve
Page 103 and 104: Appendix D: Presenta on Loca ons Da
Page 105 and 106: Appendix G: Interview Protocol What
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix I: Sample Resolu on (con
Page 109 and 110:
Appendix J: Drive Kind Ride Kind Pr
Page 111 and 112:
Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking O
Page 113 and 114:
Appendix K: Model Bicycle Parking O
Page 115 and 116:
SR-1 K E Y MAP SR-2 SR-3 SR-4 SR-5
Page 117 and 118:
SR-1 SR-2 Appendix L: Priority Spor
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
SR-11 SR-9 SR-8 SR-10 SR-12 SR-10 A
Page 127 and 128:
SR-11 SR-9 SR-10 SR-12 SR-13 SR-12
Page 129 and 130:
SR-11 SR-12 SR-14 Appendix L: Prior
Page 131:
SR-16 SR-15 Appendix L: Priority Sp
show all

Phase 1 Bike Plan_r

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?