Phase 1 Bike Plan_r

IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX
**Cost of Implementa on:
Low - Poten ally accomplished through process modifica on within limits of exis ng budgets
Medium - May require re-alloca on of funding and/or supplemental funds
High - Will require supplemental and/or dedicated capital improvements funding
CAT
Sub
CAT
Strategy
Case
Study
Special Topics
Narra ve
Appendix
Lead En ty
Cost of
Implementa on**
Poten al
Partners
Priority
Implement Road Work Project Planning Checklist developed by the MobilityCC
Subcommi ee of the City's Transporta on Advisory Commission to ensure that all relevant
ancillary plans are consulted as part of the roadway project scoping/planning process to
ensure that ADA/pedestrian/bicycle/u lity infrastructure projects are included
opportunis cally with minimal marginal addi onal cost for implementa on
9
City of Corpus Chris
Engineering Dept
Low
High
Public Policy and Code Reform
Inves ng in Infrastructure
Establish a permanent budget item for bicycle infrastructure maintenance (including debris
removal), possibly coupled with exis ng streets and/or stormwater system maintenance
program(s)
Develop wri en procedures for maintenance of bicycle infrastructure based on the reference
design and maintenance standards cited in the Infrastructure Illustra ons sec on of this
plan; include a detailed schedule and quality control plan
Consider installing road signs bearing the message Bikes May Use Full Lanes as an alterna ve
signs bearing the more ambiguous message Share the Road
Paint sharrow symbols on the pavement in the outer travel lane of streets that are part of a
Priority Sport Route for Road Bikes, including streets for which this Plan prescribes a one-way
cycle track outside of the roadway, in order to indicate to motorists that high speed sport
cyclists may—and have the right to—opt to remain in the travel lane by virtue of the type of
equipment they use, the speeds at which they travel, and their tendency to ride in groups
When roads that are outside the bicycle mobility network are subject to reconstruc on,
exis ng on-street bike lanes should be removed EXCEPT when the road is part of a Priority
Sport Route for Road Bikes, in which case the decision should be ve ed with the sport road
bicycling community. Decommissioning on street bike lanes that are not part of the network
prescribed in this plan will create surplus ROW for other uses (e.g. transit lane or safety
shoulder) or to allow the curb to curb width of the segment to be narrowed, thus reducing
capital costs for both roadway reconstruc on and maintenance; when such savings is
realized rela ve to preserving the exis ng condi on, it should be diverted as a dedicated
funding stream for bike infrastructure projects and maintenance (per the bike mobility
network defined in this Plan)
L
L
City Manager(s);
City Council(s)
Municipal Engineering
Depts.
Municipal Engineering
Depts.
Municipal Engineering
Depts.
Municipal Engineering
Depts.
Medium
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
High
High
Medium
High
Designate a City staff liaison to lead implementa on of the Strategic Plan for Ac ve Mobility
and to provide regular status reports on program development recommenda ons as well as
network build out to relevant boards, commissions, and City Council
City Manager(s)
Low
City Council(s)
High
Program Evalua on
Program
Oversight
Performance
Measures
Establish a municipal commi ee comprising invested volunteers as well as municipal staff
(Portland) OR enhance the scope of responsibility of the exis ng Bicycle & Pedestrian
Subcommi ee of the City of Corpus Chris Transporta on Advisory Commission (Corpus
Chris ) to: 1. serve in an advisory capacity for bicycle infrastructure and program
development issues 2. provide accountability for municipal staff in a aining
implementa on milestones 3. assist municipal staff in public engagement
Begin collec ng data (annually, except in the case where noted) for each of the metrics
iden fied in the Special Topics Narra ve
Work with the MPO to implement (target: every 3 year) a Bike Demand/Community
Percep on Survey based on protocol used in development of this Plan
17 10
11
City Council(s)
Municipal Engineering
Depts
Municipal Planning
Depts.
Low
Low
Low
MPO
High
High
High
72
IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX