26.02.2016 Views

pakistan’s

SR55_Mapping_Pakistan_February2016

SR55_Mapping_Pakistan_February2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

This essay diachronically analyzes data on political violence in Pakistan to demonstrate<br />

the historical nature of the problem; provides a brief discussion of the most important<br />

violent groups; discusses the various obstacles that will prevent Pakistan from undertaking<br />

the necessary reforms to secure its citizens; and concludes with a discussion of the policy<br />

implications that derive from this analysis.<br />

MAIN ARGUMENT<br />

Pakistan has long been beset by ethno-nationalist, communal, political, and Islamist<br />

violence. Much of this violence stems from the state’s failure to develop an inclusive form<br />

of nationalism and concomitant strategy of state building. Specifically, Pakistan’s insistence<br />

on the fundamentally communal and exclusionary “two-nation theory” as its national<br />

ideology resulted in the loss of East Pakistan and encourages ever more narrow definitions<br />

of who is suitably “Muslim” for Pakistan. At the same time, Pakistan’s security institutions<br />

have instrumentalized a menagerie of Islamist militants to prosecute its internal as well as<br />

external policies with respect to India and Afghanistan. Since 2001, many of these erstwhile<br />

proxies have turned their guns and suicide devices on the state and its citizenry under the<br />

banner of the Pakistani Taliban. A lack of both will and capacity hinder the state’s ability<br />

to effectively confront this threat and secure its population. Most problematically, Pakistan<br />

still wants to nurture some militants who are its assets while eliminating those who fight<br />

the state. Civilians also lack the ability, will, or vision to force the security forces to change<br />

tactics.<br />

POLICY IMPLICATIONS<br />

• Pakistan is unlikely to abandon its national ideology or reconsider notions of state<br />

building that may persuade providers of violence to put down their arms.<br />

• Pakistan is also unlikely to be able to improve the capabilities of the varied institutions<br />

tasked with internal security and rule of law due to political constraints and civil-military<br />

imbalances.<br />

• As a result, Pakistan will become ever more dangerous, mostly for its own citizenry.<br />

Pakistan’s Shia, Ahmedi, and even Barelvis will be most at risk, as well as the small<br />

numbers of non-Muslims.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!