ANNUAL%20REPORT%202015%20eng
ANNUAL%20REPORT%202015%20eng
ANNUAL%20REPORT%202015%20eng
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Appendix I<br />
Criteria<br />
Commentary<br />
• The nature, amount and representativeness of metallurgical test work<br />
undertaken, the nature of the metallurgical domaining applied and the<br />
corresponding metallurgical recovery factors applied.<br />
• Any assumptions or allowances made for deleterious elements.<br />
• The existence of any bulk sample or pilot scale test work and the degree<br />
to which such samples are considered representative of the orebody as a<br />
whole.<br />
• For minerals that are defined by a specification, has the ore reserve<br />
estimation been based on the appropriate mineralogy to meet the<br />
specifications?<br />
• The metallurgical process for washing the coking coal seams is already in place<br />
and being used. It is a low cut high cut dense media processing plant at the<br />
UHG mine site. The process is well tested and robust. Coking coal seams 0C,<br />
3A and 4 have been mined and processed through this plant and the ash-yield<br />
curves for these seams have been reconciled and adjusted with the laboratory<br />
generated curves from the back analysis of results when these seams were<br />
washed.<br />
• The process generates primary coking coal product from a low cut point that will<br />
produce a 10.5% (ad) ash HCC and 9.5% (ad) SSCC product, and a secondary<br />
middlings product of 18% (ad) ash is produced from a variable high cut.<br />
• International coal processing consultant Norwest Corporation has generated<br />
ash-yield curves for all the coking coal seams.<br />
• A conventional Jig washing plant is planned for processing thermal coal seams<br />
to produce a relatively high ash low energy thermal coal product suitable for<br />
export or domestic use.<br />
Environmental • The status of studies of potential environmental impacts of the mining<br />
and processing operation. Details of waste rock characterisation and the<br />
consideration of potential sites, status of design options considered and,<br />
where applicable, the status of approvals for process residue storage<br />
and waste dumps should be reported.<br />
• An Environmental Impact Statement has been prepared and all environmental<br />
approvals obtained.<br />
• Waste rock characterisation results do not require special placement<br />
requirements or procedures in the dumps.<br />
• Coal processing plant reject is stored appropriately in the waste dumps or<br />
storage cells in accordance with the environmental approvals.<br />
Annual Report 2015<br />
207