28.08.2016 Views

[Edited_by_A._Ciancio,_C.N.R.,_Bari,_Italy_and_K.(Bookos.org)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

200<br />

FARHA-REHMAN ET AL.<br />

pathway for activating plant defense genes against attacking herbivores <strong>and</strong><br />

pathogens is mediated <strong>by</strong> a lipid based signal transduction cascade. In this pathway,<br />

linolenic acid (18:3) is liberated from cell membranes <strong>and</strong> is converted to<br />

cyclopentanones involved in transcriptional regulation of plant defense genes<br />

(Conconi et al., 1996).<br />

A wide range of genes in plants are activated on herbivore attacks, <strong>and</strong> their<br />

activation is strongly correlated with the mode of herbivores feeding <strong>and</strong> degree of<br />

tissue damage at the feeding site (Walling, 2000). Phloem feeding whiteflies <strong>and</strong><br />

aphids producing little injury to plant foliage were perceived as pathogens <strong>and</strong><br />

activate the salicylic acid (SA)-dependent <strong>and</strong> JA ethylene-dependent signalling<br />

pathways. Volatiles blends provided specific cues to attract specialist parasites <strong>and</strong><br />

predators to attack infesting herbivores (Walling, 2000).<br />

Herbivory on lima bean leaves induced volatiles elicitor defence genes<br />

(Arimura et al., 2000). In uninfested lima bean leaves, five separate sets of defense<br />

genes were activated on exposure to volatiles from co-specific leaves infested <strong>by</strong><br />

Tetranychus urticae. All these genes were not activated when uninfested leaves were<br />

exposed to volatiles from artificially wounded leaves (Arimura et al., 2000). The<br />

expression pattern of these genes was similar to that produced on exposure to JA. At<br />

least three terpenoids of the released volatiles were responsible for the gene<br />

activation, which were released in response to herbivory but not on artificial<br />

wounding. Expression of these genes required calcium influx <strong>and</strong> protein<br />

phosphorylation/dephosphorylation (Arimura et al., 2000).<br />

The herbivore induced volatiles in Arabidopsis thaliana attracted the parasitoid<br />

Cotesia robecula (Van Poecke, Posthumus, & Dicke, 2001). The A. thaliana plants<br />

infested <strong>by</strong> Pieris rapae emitted volatiles from several major biosynthetic pathways,<br />

including terpenoids <strong>and</strong> green leaf volatiles. Haq et al. (2004) focused on the utility of<br />

the protein proteinase inhibitor genes in combating insects, pests, <strong>and</strong> pathogen as<br />

natural <strong>and</strong> engineered phytoprotection. Devoto et al. (2005) found COII as a key<br />

regulator of genes involved in wound. The methyl jasmonate induced secondary<br />

metabolism, defence <strong>and</strong> hormone interactions. COII expressed approximately 84% of<br />

212 genes induced <strong>by</strong> JA, <strong>and</strong> approximately 44% of 153 genes induced <strong>by</strong> wounding.<br />

COII displayed a pivotal role in wound <strong>and</strong> JA signalling (Devoto et al., 2005). The<br />

volatile emission on green leaf wounding induced the release of acetylated derivatives<br />

<strong>and</strong> a terpenoid in maize, <strong>and</strong> these compounds in turn induced JA production in intact<br />

plants (Yan & Wang, 2006). The wound-induced green leaf volatiles (GLVs) caused<br />

the release of acetylated derivatives <strong>and</strong> a terpenoid, (E)-4,8-dimethylnona-1, 3, 3-<br />

triene (DMNT) in intact maize, which may be a type of plant-plant interaction<br />

mediated <strong>by</strong> airborne GLVs (Yan & Wang, 2006).<br />

Karban <strong>and</strong> Niiho (1995) worked on plant “memory” to induce resistance <strong>and</strong><br />

susceptibility to herbivory. Many plants have been found to be highly induced <strong>by</strong><br />

repeated herbivory, than <strong>by</strong> a single herbivore bout. The frequency <strong>and</strong> magnitude of<br />

damage were confounded <strong>and</strong> thus it was not clear if a biochemical “memory” was<br />

involved or overall damage amplified the induced response (Karban & Niiho, 1995). In<br />

this experiment, the cotton plant attacked <strong>by</strong> spider mites <strong>and</strong> mechanical damage of<br />

cotyledon induced resistance, but damage of apical buds induced susceptibility, due to<br />

differentially affected hormonal regulation in both tissue types (Karban & Niiho, 1995).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!