03.03.2017 Views

On the Spectrum

2lm5UyR

2lm5UyR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

Age- and sex-related associations with time spent in dynamic states<br />

Next, we explored how dynamic connectivity properties such as mean dwell time (MDT) and<br />

fraction of time spent in dynamic states (FT) change as functions of age and sex (Figure 5).<br />

Here, for each of <strong>the</strong> dynamic FNC states, we computed <strong>the</strong> MDT (how long an individual<br />

spends in a given state on average) and FT (total time spent in a given state). The equations<br />

for MDT and FT are given in <strong>the</strong> online method section. We found that older children showed<br />

higher MDT and FT in <strong>the</strong> globally modularized dFNC state, or State-1. Conversely, younger<br />

subjects showed higher MDT and FT in <strong>the</strong> globally disconnected state, or State-2. We also<br />

investigated <strong>the</strong> sex-related differences in MDT and FT in <strong>the</strong> dynamic states. We found that<br />

in <strong>the</strong> disconnected state (State-2), boys showed higher FT, whereas in DMN-modularized<br />

state (State-3), girls showed higher MDT and FT. The o<strong>the</strong>r two dynamic states, <strong>the</strong> globally<br />

modularized state (State-1) and <strong>the</strong> globally hyperconnected state (State-4) showed trendlevel<br />

sex effects, where boys showed higher MDT and FT compared to girls in States-1 and -4.<br />

Characterization of dynamic connectopathy (chronnectopathy) in autistic traits and<br />

children with ASD<br />

In addition to characterizing static and dynamic FNCs in typical development, we also studied<br />

<strong>the</strong> chronnectopathy, or disruption of <strong>the</strong> typical dynamic connectivity patterns, in children<br />

with autistic traits. We assessed autistic traits using <strong>the</strong> Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)<br />

(Constantino, Davis, Todd, Schindler, Gross et al. 2003) in a subset of children (n=560). For<br />

static connectivity, one component pair (<strong>the</strong> left supplementary motor area, i.e. SMA, and <strong>the</strong><br />

right supramarginal gyrus, i.e. SmG), showed an association with autistic traits. Specifically,<br />

children with more autistic traits showed weaker static FNC. Interestingly, for dFNC State-3,<br />

children with more autistic traits showed higher connectivity in three component pairs (right<br />

insula and left superior frontal gyrus, right SmG and left precuneus i.e. preC, and right insula<br />

and left preC) and lower connectivity in two component pairs (right-insula and right SmG, and<br />

left SMA and right SmG). Next, we assessed how MDT and FT vary with respect to autistic trait<br />

scores (Figure 6). In <strong>the</strong> globally disconnected state (State-2), autistic traits showed a positive<br />

association with MDT. In <strong>the</strong> DMN-modularized state (State-3), autistic traits were negatively<br />

associated with MDT. Thus, children with high levels of autistic traits spent more time in<br />

<strong>the</strong> globally disconnected state (State-2) and children with lower levels spent more time in<br />

<strong>the</strong> DMN-modularized state (State-3). Results remained highly consistent when models were<br />

additionally adjusted for non-verbal IQ. A similar pattern of effects was observed at <strong>the</strong> severe<br />

end of <strong>the</strong> spectrum, when 22 children with clinical ASD were compared to 88 age, sex and<br />

IQ matched controls (Figure S6). Fur<strong>the</strong>r, in order to assess whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> above-mentioned<br />

associations are a core feature of <strong>the</strong> trait-continuum or if effects were driven by <strong>the</strong> most<br />

severely affected children, sensitivity analyses were run. In <strong>the</strong>se sensitivity analyses, children<br />

with clinical ASD or an autistic traits score above <strong>the</strong> screening threshold were excluded, and<br />

results remained consistent (Figure S7).<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!