On the Spectrum
2lm5UyR
2lm5UyR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 5<br />
Age- and sex-related associations with time spent in dynamic states<br />
Next, we explored how dynamic connectivity properties such as mean dwell time (MDT) and<br />
fraction of time spent in dynamic states (FT) change as functions of age and sex (Figure 5).<br />
Here, for each of <strong>the</strong> dynamic FNC states, we computed <strong>the</strong> MDT (how long an individual<br />
spends in a given state on average) and FT (total time spent in a given state). The equations<br />
for MDT and FT are given in <strong>the</strong> online method section. We found that older children showed<br />
higher MDT and FT in <strong>the</strong> globally modularized dFNC state, or State-1. Conversely, younger<br />
subjects showed higher MDT and FT in <strong>the</strong> globally disconnected state, or State-2. We also<br />
investigated <strong>the</strong> sex-related differences in MDT and FT in <strong>the</strong> dynamic states. We found that<br />
in <strong>the</strong> disconnected state (State-2), boys showed higher FT, whereas in DMN-modularized<br />
state (State-3), girls showed higher MDT and FT. The o<strong>the</strong>r two dynamic states, <strong>the</strong> globally<br />
modularized state (State-1) and <strong>the</strong> globally hyperconnected state (State-4) showed trendlevel<br />
sex effects, where boys showed higher MDT and FT compared to girls in States-1 and -4.<br />
Characterization of dynamic connectopathy (chronnectopathy) in autistic traits and<br />
children with ASD<br />
In addition to characterizing static and dynamic FNCs in typical development, we also studied<br />
<strong>the</strong> chronnectopathy, or disruption of <strong>the</strong> typical dynamic connectivity patterns, in children<br />
with autistic traits. We assessed autistic traits using <strong>the</strong> Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)<br />
(Constantino, Davis, Todd, Schindler, Gross et al. 2003) in a subset of children (n=560). For<br />
static connectivity, one component pair (<strong>the</strong> left supplementary motor area, i.e. SMA, and <strong>the</strong><br />
right supramarginal gyrus, i.e. SmG), showed an association with autistic traits. Specifically,<br />
children with more autistic traits showed weaker static FNC. Interestingly, for dFNC State-3,<br />
children with more autistic traits showed higher connectivity in three component pairs (right<br />
insula and left superior frontal gyrus, right SmG and left precuneus i.e. preC, and right insula<br />
and left preC) and lower connectivity in two component pairs (right-insula and right SmG, and<br />
left SMA and right SmG). Next, we assessed how MDT and FT vary with respect to autistic trait<br />
scores (Figure 6). In <strong>the</strong> globally disconnected state (State-2), autistic traits showed a positive<br />
association with MDT. In <strong>the</strong> DMN-modularized state (State-3), autistic traits were negatively<br />
associated with MDT. Thus, children with high levels of autistic traits spent more time in<br />
<strong>the</strong> globally disconnected state (State-2) and children with lower levels spent more time in<br />
<strong>the</strong> DMN-modularized state (State-3). Results remained highly consistent when models were<br />
additionally adjusted for non-verbal IQ. A similar pattern of effects was observed at <strong>the</strong> severe<br />
end of <strong>the</strong> spectrum, when 22 children with clinical ASD were compared to 88 age, sex and<br />
IQ matched controls (Figure S6). Fur<strong>the</strong>r, in order to assess whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> above-mentioned<br />
associations are a core feature of <strong>the</strong> trait-continuum or if effects were driven by <strong>the</strong> most<br />
severely affected children, sensitivity analyses were run. In <strong>the</strong>se sensitivity analyses, children<br />
with clinical ASD or an autistic traits score above <strong>the</strong> screening threshold were excluded, and<br />
results remained consistent (Figure S7).<br />
106