04.03.2018 Views

Sahaba - The Blessed

At the beginning of the book (The Blessed) superiority of Ashâb of our prophet, Muhammad ´alayhissalâm, is explained along with how unjust and ignorant are those who defame Ashâb-ı-kirâm. Besides, the meaning of ijtihâd is explained. In the part of cautioning, an answer is given to the book (Hüsniyye) written by an enemy of Islam. In another part, biographies of great savants of Islam - hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni and hadrat Sayyed Abdülhakîm-ı Arvâsi - are explained. In the part Two Apples of the Eye of Muslims superiority of hadrat Abû Bakr and hadrat Omar is explained; in the part The First Fitna in Islam events between Ashâb-ı-kirâm are explained beautifully from the pen of hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni Ahmad Fârûkî Sarhandi who explains that to love all of Ashâb-ı-kirâm is a fundamental condition of being Ahl-i-sunnat.

At the beginning of the book (The Blessed) superiority of Ashâb of our prophet, Muhammad ´alayhissalâm, is explained along with how unjust and ignorant are those who defame Ashâb-ı-kirâm. Besides, the meaning of ijtihâd is explained. In the part of cautioning, an answer is given to the book (Hüsniyye) written by an enemy of Islam. In another part, biographies of great savants of Islam - hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni and hadrat Sayyed Abdülhakîm-ı Arvâsi - are explained. In the part Two Apples of the Eye of Muslims superiority of hadrat Abû Bakr and hadrat Omar is explained; in the part The First Fitna in Islam events between Ashâb-ı-kirâm are explained beautifully from the pen of hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni Ahmad Fârûkî Sarhandi who explains that to love all of Ashâb-ı-kirâm is a fundamental condition of being Ahl-i-sunnat.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

estrange the short-sighted people from the imâm by alleging that<br />

he denied the Wahdat-i-wujûd which was a science for spiritual<br />

improvement established by the great shaikhs of Islam. <strong>The</strong>y tried<br />

to antagonize his admirers by asserting that he denied the<br />

Meshâikh-i-izâm and boasted of having attained the ma’rifat of<br />

Allâhu ta’âlâ directly without a guide. <strong>The</strong> defamations<br />

culminated when they finally tried to besmear him with the<br />

political felony of insubordination against the government and<br />

contempt for the laws and, into the bargain, many another libel<br />

which a Muslim could never commit against another.<br />

26– His alleged denial of the Meshâikh-i-izâm was a blatant lie.<br />

<strong>The</strong> truth becomes manifest immediately upon beginning to read<br />

his book Maktûbât, which is a clear evidence of his profound<br />

respect towards the Meshâikh-i-izâm, so much so that he attaches<br />

beautiful meanings even to their words that are vulnerable to<br />

misinterpretation and which for centuries their enemies have<br />

exploited as fulcrums to bring their calumniations to bear, -as for<br />

their words that do not seem to be susceptible of a benevolent<br />

interpretation, he says that they were the erroneous words which<br />

those great people had said during their apprenticeship and which<br />

they corrected after attaining higher grades. He says that errors of<br />

kashf (in the paths of Tasawwuf), like errors of ijtihâd (committed<br />

by scholars who have attained the grade of ijtihâd), are not only<br />

pardonable but also meritorious acts that are likely to be rewarded<br />

(in the Hereafter). As regards his alleged denial of Wahdat-iwujûd;<br />

those who read Maktûbât will know that the truth is quite<br />

the other way round and that he handles the matter with<br />

unprecedented adroitness by, on the one hand, protecting Islam’s<br />

honour and, on the other, paying heed to the dignity of those great<br />

people.<br />

27– <strong>The</strong> statesmen under the time’s Sultân Selîm Jihânghir<br />

Khân, including his grand vizier, his chief muftî and his harem,<br />

were not Sunnî Muslims. However, most of the Imâm’s letters, and<br />

also his booklet Radd-i-rawâfid, especially, repudiate people<br />

without a Madhhab and explain that they are ignorant, stupid and<br />

base people. Imâm-i-Rabbânî sent that booklet of his to Abdullah<br />

Jenghiz Khân, the time’s greatest Uzbek Khân in Bukhârâ, with the<br />

note, “Show this booklet to the Iranian Shâh Abbâs Safawî! If he<br />

accepts it, things will be quite all right. If he does not, then it will be<br />

permissible to make war against him.” When the Shâh’s answer was<br />

in the negative, a war was made. Abdullah Khân took Herat<br />

– 206 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!