04.03.2018 Views

Sahaba - The Blessed

At the beginning of the book (The Blessed) superiority of Ashâb of our prophet, Muhammad ´alayhissalâm, is explained along with how unjust and ignorant are those who defame Ashâb-ı-kirâm. Besides, the meaning of ijtihâd is explained. In the part of cautioning, an answer is given to the book (Hüsniyye) written by an enemy of Islam. In another part, biographies of great savants of Islam - hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni and hadrat Sayyed Abdülhakîm-ı Arvâsi - are explained. In the part Two Apples of the Eye of Muslims superiority of hadrat Abû Bakr and hadrat Omar is explained; in the part The First Fitna in Islam events between Ashâb-ı-kirâm are explained beautifully from the pen of hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni Ahmad Fârûkî Sarhandi who explains that to love all of Ashâb-ı-kirâm is a fundamental condition of being Ahl-i-sunnat.

At the beginning of the book (The Blessed) superiority of Ashâb of our prophet, Muhammad ´alayhissalâm, is explained along with how unjust and ignorant are those who defame Ashâb-ı-kirâm. Besides, the meaning of ijtihâd is explained. In the part of cautioning, an answer is given to the book (Hüsniyye) written by an enemy of Islam. In another part, biographies of great savants of Islam - hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni and hadrat Sayyed Abdülhakîm-ı Arvâsi - are explained. In the part Two Apples of the Eye of Muslims superiority of hadrat Abû Bakr and hadrat Omar is explained; in the part The First Fitna in Islam events between Ashâb-ı-kirâm are explained beautifully from the pen of hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni Ahmad Fârûkî Sarhandi who explains that to love all of Ashâb-ı-kirâm is a fundamental condition of being Ahl-i-sunnat.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ijtihâd caused mujtahids to be promoted to higher grades. Not so<br />

is the case with the ijtihâds done after Rasûlullah’s ‘sall-Allâhu<br />

’alaihi wa sallam’ passing away; religious teachings found by way<br />

of those ijtihâds are not guaranteed. <strong>The</strong>y cannot be said to be<br />

definitely correct teachings. <strong>The</strong>refore, it is not compulsory to<br />

believe that they are correct, although it is permissible to act in<br />

accordance with them. It is not kufr (disbelief) to deny their<br />

correctness. However, if the ijtihâds reached by all mujtahids<br />

indicate identical results, which is called ijmâ’ (consensus,<br />

unanimity), it is compulsory to believe in the correctness of the<br />

teachings found by such unanimous ijtihâds.<br />

We will beautify the conclusive part of our letter by writing the<br />

superiorities of the Ahl-i-Bayt ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anhum<br />

ajma’în’ of Rasûlullah ‘sall-Allâhu ’alaihi wa sallam’:<br />

It is stated in a hadîth-i-sherîf quoted on the authority of Yûsuf<br />

bin Abdulberr: “He who loves Alî will have loved me (by doing<br />

so). He who is inimical towards Alî will have been inimical towards<br />

me (by being so). He who hurts Alî will have hurt me. And he who<br />

hurts me will have hurt Allâhu ta’âlâ.”<br />

[Some people exploit this hadîth-i-sherîf as an attestation to<br />

stigmatize those who fought Hadrat Alî as disbelievers. <strong>The</strong> fact,<br />

however, was that the parties who fought each other were not<br />

inimical towards each other. <strong>The</strong>ir hearts were not angry with each<br />

other although they hurt each other physically. Amidst the fights<br />

Hadrat Alî ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’ called the other party “Our<br />

brothers”. And Hadrat Mu’âwiya ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’ wrote, “My<br />

master,” about Hadrat Alî. It is written as follows in the hundred<br />

and forty-ninth (149) page of the seventh chapter of the 1331-<br />

Istanbul edition of the book Qisâs-i-Anbiyâ: When Hadrat Hasan<br />

ceded the caliphate (to Hadrat Mu’âwiya), which the greater ones<br />

of the Sahâba such as Sa’d bin Abî Waqqâs accepted, the<br />

government of Hadrat Mu’âwiya was canonically lawful. Hadrat<br />

Mu’âwiya seized the power by the use of force although he was<br />

one of the Sahâba. Yet the time and the circumstances had made<br />

it inevitable. People were acting in defiance of the Khalîfa’s<br />

authority. Force and power were necessary, which meant the<br />

commencement of the era of sovereignty. Mu’âwiya ‘radiy-Allâhu<br />

’anh’ was rightful and eligible for the position. As is seen, even the<br />

book Qisâs-i-Anbiyâ, which these exploiters rely on as a basis for<br />

their argument, writes that Hadrat Mu’âwiya was one of the<br />

Sahâba and attaches the phrase of blessing ‘radiy-Allâhu ’anh’ to<br />

– 334 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!