04.03.2018 Views

Sahaba - The Blessed

At the beginning of the book (The Blessed) superiority of Ashâb of our prophet, Muhammad ´alayhissalâm, is explained along with how unjust and ignorant are those who defame Ashâb-ı-kirâm. Besides, the meaning of ijtihâd is explained. In the part of cautioning, an answer is given to the book (Hüsniyye) written by an enemy of Islam. In another part, biographies of great savants of Islam - hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni and hadrat Sayyed Abdülhakîm-ı Arvâsi - are explained. In the part Two Apples of the Eye of Muslims superiority of hadrat Abû Bakr and hadrat Omar is explained; in the part The First Fitna in Islam events between Ashâb-ı-kirâm are explained beautifully from the pen of hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni Ahmad Fârûkî Sarhandi who explains that to love all of Ashâb-ı-kirâm is a fundamental condition of being Ahl-i-sunnat.

At the beginning of the book (The Blessed) superiority of Ashâb of our prophet, Muhammad ´alayhissalâm, is explained along with how unjust and ignorant are those who defame Ashâb-ı-kirâm. Besides, the meaning of ijtihâd is explained. In the part of cautioning, an answer is given to the book (Hüsniyye) written by an enemy of Islam. In another part, biographies of great savants of Islam - hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni and hadrat Sayyed Abdülhakîm-ı Arvâsi - are explained. In the part Two Apples of the Eye of Muslims superiority of hadrat Abû Bakr and hadrat Omar is explained; in the part The First Fitna in Islam events between Ashâb-ı-kirâm are explained beautifully from the pen of hadrat Imâm-ı Rabbâni Ahmad Fârûkî Sarhandi who explains that to love all of Ashâb-ı-kirâm is a fundamental condition of being Ahl-i-sunnat.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

written by Hadrat ’Uthmân ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anh’, and that it<br />

was an act of duplicity contrived by some ignoble tribesmen, is<br />

written in a history book by Yâfi’î.<br />

Question: Hadrat ’Uthmân did not inflict qisâs on Abdullah bin<br />

’Umar ‘radiy-Allâhu ta’âlâ ’anhum ajma’în’.<br />

Answer: <strong>The</strong> Khalîfa appeased the murdered person’s<br />

inheritors by giving them plenty of property. This precaution<br />

forestalled an imminent fitna. <strong>The</strong> event was a typical example of<br />

administrative finesse.<br />

Question: Hadrat ’Uthmân made fields and farms.<br />

Answer: Yes, he did. And he made them not as his own<br />

property, but as pastures and habitats for the animals belonging to<br />

the Bayt-ul-mâl. This policy was a great service to the Bayt-ulmâl.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is no evidence to imply that Hadrat Alî had to do with<br />

the martyrdom of Hadrat ’Uthmân. Nor is there an iota of<br />

likelihood as to that. Because the murderers were numerous and<br />

dominant, Hadrat Alî could not perform the qisâs immediately.<br />

Moreover, Hadrat ’Uthmân’s inheritors did not demand qisâs. Nor<br />

was the assassin known by name. As a matter of fact, the<br />

murderers were rebellious against Hadrat ’Uthmân, and,<br />

(strategically,) obedient to Hadrat Alî.<br />

<strong>The</strong> election that brought Hadrat Alî to office as (the new)<br />

Khalîfa was canonically lawful. Most of the notables who had a say<br />

in the matter paid homage to him. Talha and Zubayr were not<br />

against his caliphate. <strong>The</strong>ir only demand was the performance of<br />

the qisâs (as early as possible). It is stated as follows in the book<br />

Istî’âb: “Hadrat Alî was paid homage to on the very day when<br />

Hadrat ’Uthmân had been martyred. <strong>The</strong> Muhâjirs and the Ansâr<br />

paid homage to him. Hadrat Mu’âwiya and the Damascenes<br />

refused homage to him. Allâhu ta’âlâ declared that He would<br />

forgive them.”<br />

According to the group of Imâmiyya, it is permissible to<br />

announce the practices of an innocent (sinless) imâm (religious<br />

leader, khalîfa) in the name of the Prophet’s practices. This belief<br />

induced them to concoct quite a number of false hadîths. Daylamî<br />

and Khatîb (Baghdâdî) and ibn Asâkîr saw that the scholars<br />

before them had compiled all the hadîths that were in the<br />

categories termed Sahîh and Hasan. So they compiled the hadîths<br />

– 292 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!