Abdal Hakim Murad - The Cambridge Companion to Islamic Theology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
160 David B. Burrell CSC<br />
33. This assertion regarding the primary meaning of the term ‘‘agent’’<br />
reflects the presumption in Ghazalı’s Ash‘arite milieu that identified<br />
agency with the activity of creating.<br />
34. For the sense of rid _<br />
a, see Marie-Louise Siauve’s translation of the<br />
Revival’s ‘‘Book of Love’’: Le Livre de l’amour, du désir ardent, de<br />
l’intimité et du parfait contentement (Paris, 1986), pp. 247–68.<br />
35. This is Ghazalı’s celebrated claim regarding the universe: that it is ‘‘the<br />
best possible’’, a claim whose reception has been examined in detail by<br />
Eric Ormsby, <strong>The</strong>odicy in <strong>Islamic</strong> Thought (Prince<strong>to</strong>n, NJ, 1984), with a<br />
clarifying réprise in ‘‘Creation in Time in <strong>Islamic</strong> Thought with Special<br />
Reference <strong>to</strong> Ghazalı’’, in David B. Burrell and Bernard McGinn, God<br />
and Creation: An Ecumenical Symposium (Notre Dame, IN, 1990),<br />
pp. 246–64. See also Frank, Creation, pp.60–1.<br />
36. Burrell (tr.), Ghazalı on Faith in Divine Unity, p.276.<br />
37. This is my way of acknowledging Richard Frank’s delineation of<br />
Ghazalı’s extensive use of Avicenna (in his Creation and the Cosmic<br />
System), while demurring from the necessitarian conclusions he draws<br />
in ‘‘Currents and countercurrents’’, in Peter Riddell and Tony Street<br />
(eds.), Islam: Essays on Scripture, Thought and Society: A Festschrift in<br />
Honour of Anthony H. Johns (Leiden, 1997), pp. 113–34.<br />
38. For a detailed treatment of Razı, complete with sources, see Gimaret,<br />
Théories, pp.134–53.<br />
39. al-Tafsır al-Kabır <strong>to</strong> 13:122, tr. in Fitzgerald, ‘‘Creation in al-Tafsır<br />
al-Kabır’’, p. 99.<br />
40. al-Tafsır al-Kabır <strong>to</strong> 9:159, tr. in ibid., p. 103; Gimaret,Théories, p.142.<br />
41. al-Tafsır al-Kabır <strong>to</strong> 2:52, tr. in Gimaret, Théories, p.153.<br />
42. For Suhrawardı, see John Walbridge and Hossein Ziai’s translation and<br />
commentary, <strong>The</strong> Philosophy of Illumination (Provo, UT, 1999), as well<br />
as Ziai’s study of this book, Knowledge and Illumination (Atlanta,<br />
1990), and John Walbridge, Leaven of the Ancients: Suhrawardı and the<br />
Heritage of the Greeks (Albany, 2000).<br />
43. Arnold Davidson has translated key essays of Pierre Hadot in Philosophy<br />
as a Way of Life (Oxford, 1995). John Walbridge suggests why Sufi<br />
practices tended <strong>to</strong> eclipse natural philosophy as a path for understanding,<br />
in his Leaven of the Ancients, pp.215–20.<br />
44. Henry Corbin, Le livre des pénétrations métaphysiques (Teheran, 1964),<br />
par. 42; see my comparative study, ‘‘Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) and<br />
Mulla S _<br />
adra Shırazı (1572–1640) and the primacy of esse/wujud in<br />
philosophical theology’’, Medieval Philosophy and <strong>The</strong>ology 8 (1999),<br />
pp. 207–19.<br />
45. For Ibn ‘Arabı, see William C. Chittick, <strong>The</strong> Self-Disclosure of God:<br />
Principles of Ibn al-‘Arabı’s Cosmology (Albany, 1998); for Shankara, see<br />
Sara Grant, Towards an Alternative <strong>The</strong>ology: Confessions of a Nondualist<br />
Christian, ed. Bradley Malkovsky (Notre Dame, IN, 2001).<br />
<strong>Cambridge</strong> Collections Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008