Abdal Hakim Murad - The Cambridge Companion to Islamic Theology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Islamic</strong> philosophy (falsafa) 61<br />
the idea of validity<br />
<strong>The</strong> formative period was distinguished by the role played by Abu<br />
Yusuf ibn Ish _<br />
aq al-Kindı (d.c. 866), sometimes referred <strong>to</strong> as the ‘‘philosopher<br />
of the Arabs’’, whose works introduced the idea of the validity of<br />
philosophical investigation per se, independently of formal kalam<br />
affiliation. This notion of the validity of philosophy as an independent<br />
discipline has been fundamental <strong>to</strong> its development in <strong>Islamic</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />
Of lasting significance <strong>to</strong> the position of philosophy is Kindı’s<br />
principal view, which upholds the validity of revealed truth and at the<br />
same time holds that the demonstrative method, known by the term<br />
burhan (Arabic for Posterior Analytics, the title of Aris<strong>to</strong>tle’s most<br />
important book on logical method), is equally capable of recovering the<br />
highest form of knowledge. Kindı did not, however, attempt a systematic<br />
‘‘harmonisation’’ of revealed truth with philosophy (one of <strong>Islamic</strong><br />
philosophy’s primary goals, also known as the ‘‘rational proof of<br />
prophecy’’). His main contribution was <strong>to</strong> identify Greek texts and refine<br />
their Arabic translations (some of which he had commissioned). <strong>The</strong>se<br />
texts include extensive paraphrases of pre-Socratic authors, Pla<strong>to</strong>’s<br />
Laws, Timæus and Republic, plus paraphrases of the Phaedo and other<br />
Pla<strong>to</strong>nic texts; almost the entire Aris<strong>to</strong>telian corpus minus the Politics;<br />
and selected Neopla<strong>to</strong>nic texts, some incorrectly identified (e.g., parts of<br />
Plotinus’ Enneads IV–VI, thought <strong>to</strong> be ‘‘Aris<strong>to</strong>tle’s <strong>The</strong>ology’’); as well<br />
as works by Porphyry, notably the Isagōgē, and by Proclus, <strong>to</strong>gether with<br />
many other texts and fragments of the Greek philosophical heritage,<br />
including some elements of S<strong>to</strong>ic logic and physics associated with the<br />
late antique schools of Alexandria and Athens. In addition, Aris<strong>to</strong>telian<br />
commentaries, including those of Alexander of Aphrodisias along with<br />
their Neopla<strong>to</strong>nist interpretations, were identified and translated. 10<br />
<strong>The</strong> basic character of this period’s philosophical method is shown<br />
in Kindı’s own syncretic approach <strong>to</strong> the presentation and discussion of<br />
philosophical problems. <strong>The</strong> first attempt <strong>to</strong> construct a metaphysical<br />
system is seen in Kindı’s best-known text, On First Philosophy, in<br />
which he defines a framework based on Neopla<strong>to</strong>nist theories of<br />
emanation and the concept of the One, plus the basic Aris<strong>to</strong>telian<br />
principles of being and modality as well as the metaphysics of causality<br />
and of intellectual knowledge. <strong>The</strong> latter are given an Arabic version<br />
that partially incorporates the Aris<strong>to</strong>telian and Pla<strong>to</strong>nic theories of the<br />
soul and the Pla<strong>to</strong>nic dialectical method. Kindı argued for creation<br />
ex nihilo, based on the Pla<strong>to</strong>nic emanation of intellect, soul and matter<br />
from the One, but not as any natural causation in which the First Being<br />
<strong>Cambridge</strong> Collections Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008