26.04.2018 Views

Abdal Hakim Murad - The Cambridge Companion to Islamic Theology

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16 Introduction<br />

24. Yahya Michot, ‘‘La pandémie avicennienne au VIe/XIIe siècle’’, Arabica<br />

40 (1993), pp. 288–344.<br />

25. Dimitri Gutas, ‘‘<strong>The</strong> heritage of Avicenna: the golden age of Arabic<br />

philosophy, 1000–c. 1350’’, in Jules Janssens and Daniël De Smet (eds.),<br />

Avicenna and His Heritage (Leuven, 2002), pp. 81–97.<br />

26. Wisnovsky, Avicenna’s metaphysics, pp.16, 145–80. For a challenge <strong>to</strong><br />

this view see the review by Allan Bäck in Ars Disputandi, , 5 (2005).<br />

27. Wisnovsky, Avicenna’s Metaphysics, p.15.<br />

28. Robert Wisnovsky, ‘‘One aspect of the Avicennian turn in Sunnı<br />

theology’’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14 (2004), p. 65.<br />

29. Mecdı Meh med Efendi, H ada’iq al-Şaqa’iq (Istanbul, 1269 ah), p. 165.<br />

_ _<br />

However, after the fifteenth century, references <strong>to</strong> Ot<strong>to</strong>man ulema<br />

reading independent falsafa works are very unusual.<br />

30. Daniel Tanguay, Leo Strauss: une biographie intellectuelle (Paris, 2003),<br />

pp. 88–9.<br />

31. Gutas, ‘‘<strong>The</strong> heritage of Avicenna’’, p. 20 (emphasis in original).<br />

32. Sa‘d al-Dın al-Taftazanı, in Mus lih al-Dın Mus t afa al-Qast allanı (Molla<br />

_ _ _ _ _<br />

Kestelli), H ashiyat al-Kestellı ‘ala Sharh al-‘aqa’id (Istanbul, 1326 ah),<br />

_ _<br />

p. 17.<br />

33. Shihadeh, ‘‘From al-Ghazalı <strong>to</strong> al-Razı’’, p. 175: falsafa and kalam ‘‘came<br />

<strong>to</strong> be as if one and the same discipline’’.<br />

34. Taneli Kukkonen, ‘‘Possible worlds in the Tahafut al-Falasifa:<br />

al-Ghazalı on creation and contingency’’, Journal of the His<strong>to</strong>ry of<br />

Philosophy 38 (2000), p. 484.<br />

35. <strong>The</strong>ideathatkalam advocated an arbitrary God whose possible actions<br />

arenotboundbylogic,asintheZ ahirite theology of Ibn H azm, is<br />

_ _<br />

dismissed by Kukkonen, ibid., p. 493, in connection with Ghazalı’s<br />

thought.<br />

36. Jules Janssens, ‘‘Al-Ghazzalı’s Tahafut: is it really a rejection of<br />

Avicenna’s philosophy?’’, Journal of <strong>Islamic</strong> Studies 12 (2001), pp. 1–17.<br />

37. Michael E. Marmura, ‘‘Ghazâlî and Demonstrative Science’’, Journal of<br />

the His<strong>to</strong>ry of Philosophy 3 (1965), pp. 183–204.<br />

38. Tony Street, ‘‘Arabic logic’’, in Dov M. Gabbay and John Woods (eds.),<br />

Handbook of the His<strong>to</strong>ry of Logic, i (Amsterdam, etc., 2004), p. 527.<br />

39. Khaled El-Rouayheb, ‘‘Sunni Muslim scholars on the status of logic,<br />

1500–1800’’, in <strong>Islamic</strong> Law and Society 11 (2004), pp. 213–32.<br />

40. Shihadeh, ‘‘From al-Ghazalı <strong>to</strong> al-Razı’’, p. 147.<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> Collections Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!