26.04.2018 Views

Abdal Hakim Murad - The Cambridge Companion to Islamic Theology

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Escha<strong>to</strong>logy 311<br />

is comparable <strong>to</strong> a sleep from which one will be awakened at the<br />

resurrection, just as the present life also resembles a dream in comparison<br />

<strong>to</strong> the subsequent stages. 2<br />

Escha<strong>to</strong>logy, while specifically addressing the end of things, is<br />

implicit during our passage as individuals through the life of this<br />

world. In answering the ‘‘why’’ question of creation with varying<br />

emphases, it structures a range of responses <strong>to</strong> the human condition. For<br />

example, if asked about the purpose of life, a Muslim scholar might<br />

reply with the qur’anic verse, ‘‘Indeed I have only created jinn and<br />

human beings in order <strong>to</strong> worship Me’’ (51:56). This supplies a deon<strong>to</strong>logical<br />

ethic in which obedience <strong>to</strong> the revealed law results in reward<br />

in the afterlife and fulfils the purpose of life. This, however, has not<br />

been the only Muslim response <strong>to</strong> this question. In a well-known passage,<br />

Ibn ‘Arabı responded <strong>to</strong> the same issue by citing a tradition that<br />

God had said, ‘‘I was a hidden treasure and I wanted <strong>to</strong> be known, and<br />

therefore I created the universes.’’ 3 In this case the ultimate human<br />

purpose is gnosis (‘irfan) or realisation (tah _<br />

qıq) of the divine element<br />

immanent in all creation. Both positions are rooted in alternate qur’anic<br />

principles, one stressing the divine transcendence (tanzıh), and the other<br />

emphasising immanence (tashbıh); both uphold the concept of a chosen<br />

return <strong>to</strong> God, but one is implicitly dualistic while the other suggests a<br />

more humanistic orientation and an active participation in the<br />

escha<strong>to</strong>logical project. <strong>The</strong>se varying perspectives also displayed themselves<br />

in broader ethical perspectives on issues such as the ultimate<br />

source of evil.<br />

Cosmic creation and the end of convention<br />

<strong>The</strong> Qur’an speaks of the creation of the universe as either a process<br />

or an instantaneous response <strong>to</strong> the divine command ‘‘Be!’’ so that ‘‘it<br />

becomes’’ (kun fa-yakun) (2:117; 3:47; 6:73 and elsewhere). Within the<br />

qur’anic formulations there are various aspects of the creative process,<br />

including the dimensions of creation ex nihilo (ibda‘), creation (khalq)<br />

that occurs through combining and developing elements that already<br />

exist, and God’s continuous divine management (tadbır) (32:4–5) of<br />

creation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> idea that the natural order and physical creation as we know it<br />

will be transformed or overturned at the escha<strong>to</strong>n is found repeatedly in<br />

the Qur’an. Despite the incredulity of his unbelieving audience, in the<br />

epoch of the Prophet the concept of judgement and ‘‘the Hour’’ seems <strong>to</strong><br />

have had a radical urgency. ‘‘How shall you know? Perhaps the Hour is<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> Collections Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!