Abdal Hakim Murad - The Cambridge Companion to Islamic Theology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong>ology and Sufism 277<br />
peninsula. <strong>The</strong> atmosphere of Ibn Masarra’s school is directly felt in the<br />
followers of Shuzı of Seville, who were <strong>to</strong> be found up <strong>to</strong> Ibn ‘Arabı’s<br />
own day. Another major speculative Sufi thinker, Ibn Sab‘ın (d. 1270),<br />
emerged from Shuzı’s order during Ibn ‘Arabı’s lifetime. Ibn Sab‘ın’s<br />
school was still operating in Egypt in the fourteenth century. <strong>The</strong> actual<br />
term ‘‘unity of existence’’ in fact appears <strong>to</strong> originate with Ibn Sab‘ın,<br />
not with Ibn ‘Arabı. 62<br />
In this we have clear elements in speculative Sufism which fall<br />
beyond Avicenna’s influence. Moreover, as has been said, Avicenna’s<br />
impact on Ibn ‘Arabı himself is elusive. Nevertheless, the broadly<br />
Avicennan character of speculative Sufism was <strong>to</strong> be strongly confirmed<br />
after Ibn ‘Arabı’s death, due <strong>to</strong> the special strengths of his foremost<br />
disciple S _<br />
adr al-Dın al-Qunawı (d.1274). In an important correspondence<br />
63 with one of Avicenna’s greatest spokesmen, Nas _<br />
ir al-Dın al-T _<br />
usı,<br />
Qunawı reveals a detailed grasp of Avicenna’s work the Allusions and<br />
Remarks (al-Isharat wa’l-tanbıhat), as well as of T _<br />
usı’s commentary on<br />
it. In the light of his knowledge of these texts, Qunawı puts a series of<br />
difficult questions <strong>to</strong> T _<br />
usı, and argues for the weakness of the rational<br />
faculty. When T _<br />
usı sends his replies, Qunawı writes a new treatise in<br />
response. But it is a typical feature of dialogical engagement that the<br />
<strong>to</strong>ols and theses of the opposite party are partly accepted, and this is the<br />
case with Qunawı <strong>to</strong>o. Indeed, synthesis is <strong>to</strong> an extent Qunawı’s<br />
explict aim, for in detailing his objective in the correspondence, he<br />
explains that he wants <strong>to</strong> unite the knowledge yielded by philosophical<br />
demonstration (burhan) with the fruit of mystical perception.<br />
What begins with Qunawı, then, is the systematic formulation of<br />
wah _<br />
dat al-wujud as a virtually philosophical perspective. Qunawı’s<br />
approach is transmitted through a series of direct master–disciple relations,<br />
becoming the prevalent reading of Ibn ‘Arabı. Thus Mu’ayyad<br />
al-Dın al-Jandı and Sa‘ıd al-Din al-Farghanı were Qunawı’s direct<br />
disciples; ‘Abd al-Razzaq al-Kashanı was Jandı’s disciple, and finally<br />
Daud al-Qays _<br />
arı was in turn Kashanı’s disciple. This list contains the<br />
names of some of Ibn ‘Arabı’s greatest commenta<strong>to</strong>rs. <strong>The</strong> ultimate<br />
results of Qunawı’s philosophical transformation of the Unity of<br />
Existence are clear in the important fifteenth-century Sufi thinker and<br />
poet, ‘Abd al-Rah _<br />
man Jamı (d.1492). Jamı‘s work <strong>The</strong> Precious Pearl<br />
(al-Durra al-Fakhira) is an attempt <strong>to</strong> present Sufism (for which read Ibn<br />
‘Arabı) as a superior perspective <strong>to</strong> kalam and Avicennism, and presents<br />
Sufism’s distinctive answers <strong>to</strong> a whole series of difficult issues in the<br />
philosophy of religion: the proof of God, God’s unity, God’s knowledge<br />
(or ignorance) of particulars, the nature of God’s will, power and speech,<br />
<strong>Cambridge</strong> Collections Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008