26.04.2018 Views

Abdal Hakim Murad - The Cambridge Companion to Islamic Theology

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 <strong>The</strong> existence of God<br />

ayman shihadeh<br />

whence the need for proof?<br />

<strong>The</strong> problem of whether or not belief in God should be founded in<br />

reason has a complex his<strong>to</strong>ry in Islam. Both kalam exponents and<br />

philosophers showed a keen interest in advancing arguments for the<br />

existence of God, which was born of diverse motives, chiefly the need <strong>to</strong><br />

establish this most crucial doctrine within their broader metaphysical<br />

systems, <strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> physicalist atheism, and <strong>to</strong> support and enrich the<br />

belief and piety of believers. Yet the epistemological view that rational<br />

proof is needed <strong>to</strong> recognise the existence of God was not held universally:<br />

while some propounded discursive reasoning, others advocated<br />

fundamentally non-rational ‘‘methods’’ (sing. t _<br />

arıqa)<strong>to</strong>thisend,suchas<br />

spiritual discipline, said <strong>to</strong> provide direct, experiential knowledge of<br />

God. Some, moreover, maintained that only one correct method should<br />

be followed exclusively, whereas others allowed for a hierarchy of different<br />

methods. Related <strong>to</strong> this was the question of whether lay people<br />

must follow essentially the same route as theologians, or whether, if<br />

they are incapable of doing so, they may adhere <strong>to</strong> simple, uncritical<br />

belief instead. Let us first briefly consider some his<strong>to</strong>rical solutions <strong>to</strong><br />

this complex of questions.<br />

Most early mutakallimun typically maintain that rational reflection<br />

(naz _<br />

ar) is the only method that provides knowledge of God, <strong>to</strong> the<br />

exclusion of all other, fideist or fallacious, methods and stances. It follows<br />

that everyone, theologians and lay believers alike, ought <strong>to</strong> learn,<br />

not only the main creeds, but more primarily their key theological<br />

proofs. 1 Abu Hashim al-Jubba’ı (d.933), a prominent early Mu‘tazilite,<br />

went so far as <strong>to</strong> argue that the primary duty of each person is <strong>to</strong> rid<br />

oneself of traditional, uncritical belief by doubting God’s existence,<br />

before attempting <strong>to</strong> prove it.<br />

Most traditionalist theologians <strong>to</strong>ok the contrary view, holding<br />

that having a rationally unjustified belief in God, which accords with<br />

197<br />

<strong>Cambridge</strong> Collections Online © <strong>Cambridge</strong> University Press, 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!