17.12.2012 Views

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IRAC</strong> <strong>Instrument</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />

with no light incident on the array. The signal from the darkest background in a 100 second frame in<br />

channel 3 is only about 1000 electrons. Channel 1 has much smaller <strong>of</strong>fsets, but the sky is so dark that the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fsets are <strong>of</strong>ten larger than the background signal. Channel 2 has very small <strong>of</strong>fsets, which are less than<br />

the background signal except in short frames or certain frames immediately following a change in<br />

integration time. The background in channel 4 is so large that the <strong>of</strong>fsets are almost negligible except in<br />

very short integrations. There is no measureable excess noise from the <strong>of</strong>fset itself: the noise is not the<br />

square root <strong>of</strong> the equivalent number <strong>of</strong> charge quanta on the integrating node. This is because the <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

arises from the redistribution <strong>of</strong> charge within the mux in which the associated currents and capacitance<br />

are much greater than in the detector diodes. However, imperfect correction <strong>of</strong> this “first-frame” effect<br />

does increase the uncertainties in BCD frames. The uncertainty scales with the size <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fset and its<br />

small-scale spatial nonuniformity. Only in channel 3 does it significantly increase the total pixel noise.<br />

We can break down the <strong>of</strong>fset into contributions beginning with the largest spatial scale down to the<br />

smallest. In this view, the largest part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fset is uniform over the array, followed by the contribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> a few spatial gradients, and some pinstriping that repeats every four columns (due to the four array<br />

outputs), with a few columns with odd <strong>of</strong>fsets (due to hot pixels or parts <strong>of</strong> the mux), and weakest <strong>of</strong> all,<br />

pixel-to-pixel dependent <strong>of</strong>fsets.<br />

There are some very obvious features imposed on the true <strong>of</strong>fset, due to a relatively small number <strong>of</strong> hot<br />

pixels, and mux glow. Hot pixels usually appear bright, and in such cases one can see a trail <strong>of</strong> muxbleed<br />

(in raw images) or a pinstripe pattern in InSb arrays, or the bandwidth effect (in Si:As arrays) following<br />

the hot pixel. These pixels have high dark currents and are usually isolated, but sometimes in a clump.<br />

“Dead” pixels are really just very hot pixels, so hot that they saturate before the first pedestal sample. In a<br />

BCD image, hot pixels do not appear bright because they have been canceled by the labdark or skydark<br />

subtraction. Most hot pixels appeared after launch and are the result <strong>of</strong> hits by energetic nuclei. By<br />

annealing the arrays, we restored most pixels that got activated. Some <strong>of</strong> them cannot be restored, and<br />

thus they became “permanent” hot pixels. Some pixels jumped randomly from normal to high dark<br />

current and back, dwelling in one state for anywhere from a few minutes to weeks, so they may not be<br />

canceled by a skydark subtraction. These are <strong>IRAC</strong>'s “rogue pixels.” The <strong>IRAC</strong> “static” bad pixel masks<br />

were updated when significant changes in the permanent bad and/or hot pixels occurred.<br />

Areas <strong>of</strong> mux glow are visible in the labdark and images. Electrons and holes recombine in diodes in the<br />

mux, allowing current to flow. Photons emitted in the recombination are detected in the InSb or Si:As<br />

detector above or near the source <strong>of</strong> the glow. Most prominent is the glow from the four output FETs<br />

visible only in Channels 3 and 4 (the Si:As arrays). These are semicircular areas about 17 pixels in radius<br />

located near column 256, row 30 at the right edge <strong>of</strong> the images. The glow is most obvious in long<br />

frames. Another glow region is visible along the last few rows in all 4 channels; it comes from the unit<br />

cell FETs. Currents flow through all the unit cell FETs in the last row which is left selected during the<br />

integration, so the glow is particularly bright in the last row itself. The 3rd and faintest glow region is<br />

along the left edge (column 1) <strong>of</strong> channel 3. Detected glows have shot noise, which can exceed the<br />

background noise along the last row and in the brightest parts <strong>of</strong> the semicircular areas. Pixels are masked<br />

in these areas where the noise significantly degrades sensitivity in 100-second frames.<br />

Data Features and Artifacts 104 Darks, Flats and Bad Pixels

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!