17.12.2012 Views

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

solving for F, we find<br />

ΣI<br />

P<br />

F =<br />

ΣP<br />

i i<br />

2<br />

i<br />

<strong>IRAC</strong> <strong>Instrument</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />

Now we derive the uncertainty in the flux. Using the well-known theorem for propagation <strong>of</strong> errors<br />

2 ⎛ dF ⎞<br />

σ ⎜<br />

⎟<br />

F = Σ ,<br />

⎝ dIi<br />

⎠<br />

2<br />

and applying it to the result above, we find that<br />

σ F<br />

⎛<br />

2 Pi = Σ⎜ ⎝<br />

2<br />

ΣPi ⎞<br />

⎟<br />

⎠<br />

2<br />

σ 2 = ΣP 2 2<br />

i σ σ2<br />

2<br />

2 = 2<br />

ΣP ΣP<br />

i<br />

i<br />

,<br />

( )<br />

1<br />

or, equivalently, σF = σ N where N = , which is the definition <strong>of</strong> noise pixels.<br />

2<br />

ΣPi<br />

There are two columns for the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) <strong>of</strong> the PRF in Table 2.1. The mean<br />

FWHM is from observations <strong>of</strong> a star at 25 different locations on the array. The FWHM for “centered<br />

PRF” is for cases where the star was most closely centered in a pixel. The fifth column in Table 2.1 is the<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> the flux in the central pixel for a source that is well centered in a pixel. It was determined from<br />

the images <strong>of</strong> the focus star (after the telescope was focused) that were the most symmetric and<br />

concentrated. These values for the flux in the central pixel can be used in the saturation predictions (see<br />

Section 2.4 below). The flux in the central pixel for a random observation is lower, because the Spitzer<br />

PRF is rather undersampled at the <strong>IRAC</strong> pixel scale.<br />

2.2.3 Spectral Response<br />

The <strong>IRAC</strong> system throughput and optical performance is governed by a combination <strong>of</strong> the system<br />

components, including the lenses, beamsplitters, filters, mirrors, and detectors. The system response is<br />

based on measurements <strong>of</strong> the final in-flight system, including the beamsplitter, filter, ZnS & ZnSe<br />

coating transmissions, mirror reflectance, BaF2 and MgF2 coating transmissions, and detector quantum<br />

efficiency.<br />

At each wavelength, the spectral response curve gives the number <strong>of</strong> electrons produced in the detector<br />

per incoming photon. While the curves provided are best estimates <strong>of</strong> the actual spectral response, it is<br />

recommended that the curves are used in a relative sense for color corrections and the supplied<br />

photometric scaling (implicit in Level 1 products [“BCDs”] and described in Reach et al. 2005, PASP,<br />

117, 978, [22]) is used for absolute photometric calibration. Tests during IOC/SV showed that the out-<strong>of</strong>-<br />

<strong>Instrument</strong> Description 8 Description <strong>of</strong> Optics

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!