IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology
IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology
IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>IRAC</strong> <strong>Instrument</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />
program is designed to mask out stray or scattered light from stars outside the array location as well as<br />
filter ghosts from bright stars. The module will alter each imask, corresponding to each BCD file, with<br />
pixels likely to be affected by stray light, by turning bit 3 on for those pixels that are likely to be affected<br />
by scattered light. The program turns imask bit 2 on for those pixels likely to be affected by filter ghosts.<br />
The module first queries the 2MASS database, producing a table <strong>of</strong> sources that are likely to produce<br />
scattered light within the fie ld <strong>of</strong> view. Using the BCDs and the 2MASS table, including the flux <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bright sources, possible stray light affected areas are calculated. These pixel positions are then turned on<br />
within the imask. When the CBCDs are combined to a mosaic, the corresponding pixels in the CBCDs<br />
will not be used to produce the mosaic, thereby “masking out” the input pixels possibly affected by<br />
scattered light.<br />
<strong>IRAC</strong> data users are reminded that observations that were not adequately dithered (such as the ones made<br />
with the small-scale dither patterns) will have gaps if the stray light mask is used. In these cases, the stray<br />
light masking program can be downloaded from the Spitzer website and run on the BCDs in an<br />
unaggressive mode by setting a keyword. This disables the production <strong>of</strong> the larger masks for very bright<br />
stars (which produce diffuse scattered light over a large fraction <strong>of</strong> the array), avoiding gaps in mosaics.<br />
More information about stray light can be found in Section 7.3.1.<br />
5.2.2 Saturation<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the following artifact corrections need knowledge <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fending source’s flux to work<br />
correctly. For observations <strong>of</strong> very bright sources, the signal (and even pedestal) reads can be saturated.<br />
Therefore, the next step in the artifact mitigation process is the saturation correction.<br />
For a bright, strongly saturated point source, the DN will increase from some low number away from the<br />
source to some maximum value between 35,000 and 47,000 DN, and then decrease to a small, usually<br />
negative number, at the center. The image looks like a bright doughnut with a dark center. This inverted<br />
“crater” peak pr<strong>of</strong>ile indicates that a significant fraction <strong>of</strong> the light from the bright star may have been<br />
lost due to saturation. Recovery, or flux rectification, is possible if the point-spread-function, or PSF, <strong>of</strong><br />
the star is known. The PSF can then be scaled in flux until the the non-saturated pixels in “wings” <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stellar pr<strong>of</strong>ile can be fit correctly.<br />
There are several steps to rectify the inner region <strong>of</strong> the saturated star. First, the exact position <strong>of</strong> the<br />
saturated star is identified using the “craters”. The program then creates a sub-image around the saturated<br />
star, and that is resampled on a finer grid to match the 0.24 arcsecond resampled PSF. Remaining<br />
artifacts, such as banding and muxbleed, are masked out. The PSF is then matched pixel-by-pixe l, the<br />
PSF flux wings are scaled to the target wings, mean flux ratios are computed, and the best fit outside the<br />
inner saturated region is determined. The “lost flux” is then calculated and the star is rectified by<br />
replacing the inner, saturated pixels with flux determined from the PSF pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />
The <strong>IRAC</strong> PRF in channel 1 was found to be too narrow for stars, and so a “puffed up” version was<br />
empirically derived and found statistically to be more accurate by testing it on stars with known flux.<br />
Pipeline Processing 90 The Artifact-Corrected BCD<br />
Pipeline