17.12.2012 Views

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>IRAC</strong> <strong>Instrument</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />

program is designed to mask out stray or scattered light from stars outside the array location as well as<br />

filter ghosts from bright stars. The module will alter each imask, corresponding to each BCD file, with<br />

pixels likely to be affected by stray light, by turning bit 3 on for those pixels that are likely to be affected<br />

by scattered light. The program turns imask bit 2 on for those pixels likely to be affected by filter ghosts.<br />

The module first queries the 2MASS database, producing a table <strong>of</strong> sources that are likely to produce<br />

scattered light within the fie ld <strong>of</strong> view. Using the BCDs and the 2MASS table, including the flux <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bright sources, possible stray light affected areas are calculated. These pixel positions are then turned on<br />

within the imask. When the CBCDs are combined to a mosaic, the corresponding pixels in the CBCDs<br />

will not be used to produce the mosaic, thereby “masking out” the input pixels possibly affected by<br />

scattered light.<br />

<strong>IRAC</strong> data users are reminded that observations that were not adequately dithered (such as the ones made<br />

with the small-scale dither patterns) will have gaps if the stray light mask is used. In these cases, the stray<br />

light masking program can be downloaded from the Spitzer website and run on the BCDs in an<br />

unaggressive mode by setting a keyword. This disables the production <strong>of</strong> the larger masks for very bright<br />

stars (which produce diffuse scattered light over a large fraction <strong>of</strong> the array), avoiding gaps in mosaics.<br />

More information about stray light can be found in Section 7.3.1.<br />

5.2.2 Saturation<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the following artifact corrections need knowledge <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fending source’s flux to work<br />

correctly. For observations <strong>of</strong> very bright sources, the signal (and even pedestal) reads can be saturated.<br />

Therefore, the next step in the artifact mitigation process is the saturation correction.<br />

For a bright, strongly saturated point source, the DN will increase from some low number away from the<br />

source to some maximum value between 35,000 and 47,000 DN, and then decrease to a small, usually<br />

negative number, at the center. The image looks like a bright doughnut with a dark center. This inverted<br />

“crater” peak pr<strong>of</strong>ile indicates that a significant fraction <strong>of</strong> the light from the bright star may have been<br />

lost due to saturation. Recovery, or flux rectification, is possible if the point-spread-function, or PSF, <strong>of</strong><br />

the star is known. The PSF can then be scaled in flux until the the non-saturated pixels in “wings” <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stellar pr<strong>of</strong>ile can be fit correctly.<br />

There are several steps to rectify the inner region <strong>of</strong> the saturated star. First, the exact position <strong>of</strong> the<br />

saturated star is identified using the “craters”. The program then creates a sub-image around the saturated<br />

star, and that is resampled on a finer grid to match the 0.24 arcsecond resampled PSF. Remaining<br />

artifacts, such as banding and muxbleed, are masked out. The PSF is then matched pixel-by-pixe l, the<br />

PSF flux wings are scaled to the target wings, mean flux ratios are computed, and the best fit outside the<br />

inner saturated region is determined. The “lost flux” is then calculated and the star is rectified by<br />

replacing the inner, saturated pixels with flux determined from the PSF pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

The <strong>IRAC</strong> PRF in channel 1 was found to be too narrow for stars, and so a “puffed up” version was<br />

empirically derived and found statistically to be more accurate by testing it on stars with known flux.<br />

Pipeline Processing 90 The Artifact-Corrected BCD<br />

Pipeline

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!