IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology
IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology
IRAC Instrument Handbook - IRSA - California Institute of Technology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Point Source Fitting <strong>IRAC</strong> Images<br />
with a PRF<br />
155<br />
<strong>IRAC</strong> <strong>Instrument</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />
The <strong>IRAC</strong> PRFs are centered relative to the optical axis, so they are slightly <strong>of</strong>f center in array<br />
coordinates due to array distortion. APEX assumes that the PRF is centered on its array, so to use the<br />
PRFs with APEX requires them to be re-centered. APEX also requires odd-valued axes.<br />
APEX performs PRF fitting by varying the position and flux <strong>of</strong> a source using a modified simplex<br />
technique (see the APEX manual). However, for <strong>IRAC</strong> data, particularly in channels 1 and 2, where the<br />
PRF is undersampled, the default 5x sampling <strong>of</strong> the PRF is insufficient to obtain a sufficiently accurate<br />
position for fitting.<br />
Therefore the following transformations were applied to the PRFs:<br />
i) The PRFs were magnified (using linear interpolation) by a factor <strong>of</strong> 20 (so the resultant PRF<br />
sampling is x100).<br />
ii) The last row and column were removed to give odd-valued axes.<br />
iii) The PRF was recentered on a first-moment centroid measured using the array values within a<br />
250 (resampled) pixel border.<br />
iv) The PRF was zeroed out in a 50 (resampled) pixel border (to avoid wrapping problems).<br />
v) Information describing the PRFs and their modifications was added to the headers.<br />
C.3 Results <strong>of</strong> Tests with PRF fitting<br />
C.3.1 Test on Calibration Stars<br />
One sample observation (AOR) was selected for each <strong>of</strong> the nine brightest <strong>IRAC</strong> calibration stars (Reach<br />
et al. 2005, [23]). The selected AORs were from 2005 June 05 to 2006 September. Photometry was<br />
performed on the five BCDs in each AOR and the results averaged. (C)BCD uncertainties and imasks<br />
were used. The pipeline versions were S14.0−S14.4. The central PRF, modified for APEX use as<br />
described above, was used as the stars were close to the center <strong>of</strong> the array in each <strong>of</strong> the images.<br />
APEX_1frame was used with current default parameters in the namelists provided in the cdf/ subdirectory<br />
<strong>of</strong> the MOPEX distribution, e.g., apex_1frame_I1.nl etc, with one change. A Normalization<br />
Radius for the PRF is needed to correspond to the <strong>IRAC</strong> calibration radius <strong>of</strong> 10 pixels. This was placed<br />
in the parameter block for sourcestimate: Normalization_Radius = 1000 (since it is in units <strong>of</strong> PRF pixels,<br />
and the sampling is 100x).<br />
We performed aperture photometry using a 10 pixel (calibration) radius for <strong>IRAC</strong> channels 1 and 2, and a<br />
3 pixel radius for <strong>IRAC</strong> channels 3 and 4, and a 12−20 pixel background annulus for all. Aperture<br />
corrections from this <strong>Handbook</strong> were applied to <strong>IRAC</strong> channels 3 and 4. The use <strong>of</strong> smaller apertures at<br />
longer wavelengths is not critical but reduces the effect <strong>of</strong> background noise. No aperture corrections<br />
were needed for <strong>IRAC</strong> channels 1 and 2 for this aperture/annulus combination as it is used to define the<br />
flux calibration. The <strong>IRAC</strong> channel 1 aperture photometry was divided by the empirical pixel-phase flux<br />
correction from Chapter 4 in this <strong>Handbook</strong>: