22.12.2012 Views

Understanding earnings quality - MIT Sloan School of Management

Understanding earnings quality - MIT Sloan School of Management

Understanding earnings quality - MIT Sloan School of Management

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

attention (Aboody et al. , 1999). 71 Both studies predict that macroeconomic factors are correlated<br />

with increased incentives for <strong>earnings</strong> management. We did not find any studies that hypothesize<br />

macroeconomic conditions as a determinant <strong>of</strong> <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong> for other reasons, for example,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> variation in the ability <strong>of</strong> accruals to capture performance fundamentals when the<br />

“fundamentals” are different.<br />

6. The consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong><br />

6.1 Capital market consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong><br />

The hypothesized capital market consequences <strong>of</strong> <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong> include: short-window<br />

stock price returns around the <strong>earnings</strong> announcement date, contemporaneous long-window returns,<br />

and future stock price performance after the release <strong>of</strong> <strong>earnings</strong>-related information (Section 6.1.1);<br />

market-multiples (Section 6.1.2); cost <strong>of</strong> equity capital (Section 6.1.3); and cost <strong>of</strong> debt capital<br />

(Section 6.1.4). 72<br />

6.1.1 Return responses to <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong><br />

Contemporaneous short-window returns: In the short-window returns tests, information is assumed<br />

to be <strong>of</strong> higher <strong>quality</strong> if it has a higher association with returns. Inferring variation in EQ from the<br />

association between unexpected <strong>earnings</strong> and returns has been a prevalent research methodology<br />

since the publication <strong>of</strong> Kormendi and Lipe (1987) and Easton and Zmijewski (1989). The key<br />

findings are:<br />

71 Wilson (1987) finds that his results are driven by two observations (1981 and 1982) and conjectures that the cause<br />

might be a “macroeconomic phenomenon,” given that both were years <strong>of</strong> significant economic downturn. Bernard and<br />

Stober (1989), however, find no evidence for this conjecture.<br />

72 Many <strong>of</strong> the studies that examine market consequences use multiple measures and are cited more than once.<br />

120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!