Understanding earnings quality - MIT Sloan School of Management
Understanding earnings quality - MIT Sloan School of Management
Understanding earnings quality - MIT Sloan School of Management
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7. Conclusion<br />
Our approach in this review is to define <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong> broadly to be decision usefulness –<br />
in any decision by any decision maker. As such, the number <strong>of</strong> relevant articles numbers over 300,<br />
and by necessity our discussion is broad.<br />
An alternative approach might have been to limit the scope <strong>of</strong> the review to studies <strong>of</strong><br />
decision-usefulness only in an equity valuation context, in accordance with the original use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
term in financial statement analysis. Under that approach, we would have argued that using the term<br />
<strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong> outside <strong>of</strong> the equity valuation context is inappropriate, and we would have<br />
criticized the studies that do so and simply ignored them in our review. We would have demanded<br />
that researchers and others not use the term <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong> outside the context <strong>of</strong> equity valuation<br />
models. But we believe that ship has sailed and such a recommendation would therefore serve no<br />
purpose. Rather we attempt to understand <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong> more broadly in its current use.<br />
We emphasize two significant conclusions based on our survey <strong>of</strong> the <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong><br />
literature as a whole. First, because all <strong>of</strong> the proxies for <strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong> that involve <strong>earnings</strong> (i.e.,<br />
properties such as persistence, timely loss recognition, smoothness, and small pr<strong>of</strong>its, as well as the<br />
ERCs) have at their core the reported accrual-based <strong>earnings</strong> number, these proxies are affected by<br />
both the firm’s fundamental <strong>earnings</strong> process and by the measurement <strong>of</strong> that process. The current<br />
research does not adequately recognize the distinction between the fundamental <strong>earnings</strong> process and<br />
the measurement <strong>of</strong> the process, which limits the conclusions we, as a pr<strong>of</strong>ession, can make to<br />
statements about “<strong>earnings</strong> <strong>quality</strong>” rather than about the contribution <strong>of</strong> accounting measurement to<br />
the <strong>quality</strong> <strong>of</strong> reported <strong>earnings</strong>.<br />
Second, although all <strong>of</strong> the proxies based on reported <strong>earnings</strong> are affected by both the<br />
unobservable process and the measurement, the proxies are not equally affected by these two factors.<br />
139