Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex Draft CCP/EA November 26, 2003
remove barbed wire from the refuge, use smaller information signs, establish a picnic area
with a bear-proof garbage can, and construct fire hydrants on White Pond Road and along
Sudbury Road.
Staffing and Funding
Although one respondent believes that the refuge should not have rangers because they
merely “. . . harass old ladies . . .,” most people feel that adequate refuge staffing is essential.
While many people assert that Alternative B will meet desired staffing levels, a number of
other respondents contend that proposed staffing levels are too low. These people cite
anticipated user conflicts, present refuge hazards, and the current downsizing trend in
government as reasons to increase proposed staffing levels. Some respondents suggest
utilizing community groups and/or to form partnerships with volunteer organizations to
supplement staffing needs.
With regard to refuge management funding, the only direction provided by respondents is a
request that the FWS ensure its adequacy.
Enforcement
Respondents who comment on enforcement say that the level of enforcement on the refuge
needs to increase. Some respondents suggest that implementation of some programs be
delayed until adequate enforcement is in place. Others recommend developing a contingency
plan in case proposed enforcement levels are not effective. An additional suggestion offered
by some people is that the FWS have a backup force in place of either volunteers and/or
community officers.
The key areas identified by respondents as needing increased policing efforts are off-highway
vehicle trespass, poaching, dumping, trespass, and vandalism. As a typical respondent writes,
“Preventing illegal use by ATVs is a major enforcement challenge for properties with large
borders surrounded by suburban landscapes and with many potential entry points.”
Wild and Scenic Rivers
The one concern regarding wild and scenic river designation expressed by several
respondents is that hunting is incompatible with this designation and should be prohibited
within these areas.
Summary of Comments 12