Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Blue Iris: Photo by Marijke Holtrop<br />
- 12 -<br />
Chapter 2: The Comprehensive Conservation Planning Process<br />
<strong>NWR</strong>s. Additional issues <strong>and</strong> a need for more information prompted us to<br />
later split Mashpee <strong>and</strong> Massasoit <strong>NWR</strong>s from the draft as well.<br />
The <strong>Service</strong> solicited comments on the draft <strong>CCP</strong>/EA for Great Meadows,<br />
<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong>, <strong>and</strong> Oxbow <strong>NWR</strong>s from July 20 to September 3, 2003. We<br />
contracted with the U.S. Forest <strong>Service</strong>’s Content Analysis Team (CAT) to<br />
compile the nearly 2,000 comments that we received. The CAT developed a<br />
summary report of comments (Appendix B) as well as a database of<br />
individual comments. We utilized the original comments received, CAT<br />
report <strong>and</strong> comment database to develop a list of comments that required<br />
responses. Editorial suggestions <strong>and</strong> notes of concurrence with or<br />
opposition to certain proposals were noted <strong>and</strong> included in the decision<br />
making process, but do not receive formal responses. We have included our<br />
responses to requests for additional information or clarification, provisions<br />
of additional information, <strong>and</strong> specific concerns as Appendix C. We have<br />
made changes to the <strong>CCP</strong> where appropriate.<br />
The final product of the process is three st<strong>and</strong>-alone <strong>CCP</strong>s, one<br />
for each refuge. Implementation of the <strong>CCP</strong>s can occur once the<br />
Finding of (No) Significant Impact (FONSI) is signed.<br />
Each year, we will evaluate our accomplishments under the <strong>CCP</strong>s.<br />
Monitoring or new information may indicate the need to change<br />
our strategies. The collection of additional data at <strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />
<strong>NWR</strong> will likely require modification <strong>and</strong> specification of the<br />
wildlife <strong>and</strong> habitat management strategies. We will modify the<br />
<strong>CCP</strong> documents <strong>and</strong> associated management activities as needed, following<br />
the procedures outlined in <strong>Service</strong> policy <strong>and</strong> NEPA requirements.<br />
The<br />
<strong>CCP</strong>s will be fully revised every 15 years or sooner if necessary.<br />
Wilderness Assessment<br />
The<br />
planning team conducted a Wilderness Assessment, as required by<br />
Refuge Planning Policy, to determine if any l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> waters in fee title<br />
ownership were suitable to be proposed for designation as a Wilderness<br />
Area. During the inventory stage, we determined that the <strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />
<strong>NWR</strong> does not fulfill the eligibility requirements for a Wilderness Study<br />
Area as defined by the Wilderness Act. The refuge <strong>and</strong> its surrounding<br />
area have been altered in some way by man, with the imprint of man’s work<br />
generally noticeable. The refuge does not have 5,000 contiguous acres, <strong>and</strong><br />
is not of sufficient size as to make practicable its preservation <strong>and</strong> use in an<br />
unimpaired condition. Furthermore, permanent roads are contained within<br />
the refuge. Therefore, suitability of the refuge for Wilderness Designation<br />
is not analyzed further in this document.<br />
<strong>Assabet</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>NWR</strong>