Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Assabet River NWR Final CCP - U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Japanese Knotweed: Photo by Marijke Holtrop<br />
Chapter 4: Management Direction<br />
mission, goals, <strong>and</strong> objectives are compatible, will work together to<br />
implement habitat management <strong>and</strong> biodiversity strategies.<br />
Objective 3: Limit the spread of invasive <strong>and</strong> overabundant species <strong>and</strong><br />
minimize habitat degradation.<br />
Strategy 1: Document presence, acreage, <strong>and</strong> location of invasive <strong>and</strong><br />
overabundant species in conjunction with vegetation surveys <strong>and</strong><br />
development of a cover type map. We will take baseline measurements of<br />
key condition indices such as density, height, <strong>and</strong> percent cover.<br />
Strategy 2: Develop an Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPMP), which<br />
will provide a full range of potential <strong>and</strong> alternative mechanical, biological<br />
<strong>and</strong> chemical control strategies. We will include a monitoring program as a<br />
part of the plan, which will consist of plot sampling, estimates of cover, <strong>and</strong><br />
responses of wildlife <strong>and</strong> other plants. We will use the<br />
IPMP in concert with habitat monitoring to assess<br />
progress <strong>and</strong> the effectiveness of different techniques,<br />
<strong>and</strong> identify additional problem species. We will<br />
research alternative methods of controlling certain<br />
species as appropriate, based on monitoring results.<br />
Control strategies will be species specific <strong>and</strong> may<br />
employ biological vectors, mechanical methods (h<strong>and</strong><br />
pulling), fire, or herbicides. We will use the least<br />
intrusive, but most effective control practice. As<br />
previously discussed, use of herbicides would require<br />
action specific step down plans, <strong>and</strong> in some situations<br />
proposed control methodologies may also require<br />
wetl<strong>and</strong> permitting review <strong>and</strong> approval.<br />
Strategy 3: We will also participate in appropriate, experimental invasive<br />
species control research programs. These programs must be reviewed <strong>and</strong><br />
approved by <strong>Service</strong> regional or national biological staff <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Department of the Interior’s wildlife research arm, the Biological<br />
Resources Division, now located within the U.S. Geologic Survey, before<br />
any research is initiated.<br />
Strategy 4: Control invasive <strong>and</strong> overabundant animal species using the<br />
most effective means available. There are currently identified problems<br />
related to overabundant or invasive animal species on the refuge. Beaver<br />
have occasionally caused localized flooding of refuge trails <strong>and</strong> maintenance<br />
roads <strong>and</strong> are raising water levels, which is affecting a well on the refuge.<br />
Control of such situations includes manually clearing culverts, installing<br />
grates on culverts <strong>and</strong> water-control structures, <strong>and</strong> installing beaver<br />
deceivers in dams or on culverts. Devices range from a simple PVC pipe<br />
inserted into dams to reduce water levels, to fencing constructed in a<br />
semicircle around a culvert with drain pipes inserted through the fence. If<br />
more serious threats to habitat, refuge facilities, adjacent property or<br />
Comprehensive Conservation Plan - 49 -